Merged Trump Fires Comey....

Tony Stark said:
If using a private server and deleting emails is a coverup than surely the Bush WH is guilty of one since they deleted millions of them. Or is it OK when a Republican does it?
Click to expand...

More to the point, I wonder if logger knows how many emails and other relevant documents Trump has destroyed over the course of his countless suits and bankruptcies. I certainly don't know except that it is an integer greater than zero.
 
TraneWreck said:
Firing an incompetent worker BECAUSE of their race or gender is a good example. Firing a rat-*********** FBI director to shut down an investigation would be another.
Click to expand...
Would it be a mistake to count the asterisks to guess what you are trying to say?
 
Minoosh said:
Except that Trump hasn't (that I know of) come out saying Comey's firing had nothing to do with Hillary. He just said he'd made his mind up before he got the Justice memo. Does that mean it's technically correct that Trump followed the recommendation of that memo?
Click to expand...

Pretty sure you can't follow something to a place where you already were.

The reasons Trump gave for his decision did not involve sympathy for poor treatment of Hillary.
 
Last edited:
TraneWreck said:
Trump says otherwise.

I think it's funny that in order to carry on the silly game of yours you have to pretend to gobble up the most outlandish ********. You do it because you think it annoys us, which is a really odd approach - "I know what will teach these people, I will adopt the persona of a shockingly credulous mark. Mwahaha!"
Click to expand...

I wouldn't be so sure he's not actually a shockingly credulous mark.
 
Minoosh said:
Except that Trump hasn't (that I know of) come out saying Comey's firing had nothing to do with Hillary. He just said he'd made his mind up before he got the Justice memo. Does that mean it's technically correct that Trump followed the recommendation of that memo?
Click to expand...

Ehh... If so, it's only in the most superficial and least meaningful possible way. This question pretty much sounds like a scenario question like "If one writes down "Go to the store" on their to do list, and then goes to the store, are they doing what the list told them to do?"

Of more importance than that, though, is how Trump tried to push the responsibility for the decision onto the writer of the memo and the memo, when he was just using the memo as a pretext.
 
Last edited:
logger said:
Take a loyalty oath? Lol

He was fired for breaking long standing protcol, you know, that protocol that your side cried like babies about? That protocol that lost Hills the election?
Click to expand...

Awww, it's so cute when you haven't caught up to the narrative! You're stuck on Tuesday when the GOP was scurrying around to link arms around the false narrative that he was fired on the recommendation of the DoJ.

Fast forward with us to today. Trump's pretty much contradicted all the stooges he sent out to lie for him. Are you not getting your newsletter? The new narrative amounts to "So what? I'm the President and you're not."
 
logger said:
Nixon didn't have to resign. Republicans didn't have to remove him from office. Nixon failed them and they failed him.
Click to expand...

I think there is a difference. I think more Republicans back then put country and the rule of law before party.

Nixon had to resign. Because he surely would have been removed from office. The smoking gun tape drained what support he had even in his own party. Haldeman, Dean, Erlichman, and a few others had already been indicted for obstruction and Nixon was listed as the unnamed co-conspirator. These guys all went to prison.
 
logger said:
Nixon didn't have to resign. Republicans didn't have to remove him from office. Nixon failed them and they failed him.
Click to expand...

Republicans had to remove him from office (if he didn't resign) if they cared about doing the right thing. Yeah, I know, most Republicans today couldn't care less about that.
 
logger said:
No it was ANOTHER leftist witch hunt to take down a republican president who didn't even know about the half ass burglary.
Click to expand...

Didn't know? Surely ye jest. You're off your rocker on this argument logger. You're either suffering from a severe case of cognitive dissonance or you trolling for a reaction. Pulling chains for pulling chains sake.
 
Last edited:
logger said:
No it was ANOTHER leftist witch hunt to take down a republican president who didn't even know about the half ass burglary.
Click to expand...
My mistake. I though it was a tactically brilliant operation to drive bleeding heart civil right marcher morons crazy, and leave them vulnerable to Nixon's masterful manipulation.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom