Trump and NFL boycott

[johnny karate]

I never claimed or suggested that the Mueller report exonerated him. What we have learned since then has shown that it was predicted on an orchestrated smear. Mueller should have discovered what Durham is uncovering, but he didn't.

Kooky right wing conspiracy theories in which Trump-appointed Republicans are conspiring against Trump are my favorite kooky right wing conspiracy theories.

 

[Stacyhs]

I never claimed or suggested that the Mueller report exonerated him. What we have learned since then has shown that it was predicted on an orchestrated smear. Mueller should have discovered what Durham is uncovering, but he didn't.

As more info comes out, there was nothing for Mueller to have 'uncovered' because Durham hasn't 'uncovered' anything:

But the entire narrative appeared to be mostly wrong or old news — the latest example of the challenge created by a barrage of similar conspiracy theories from Trump and his allies.

Upon close inspection, these narratives are often based on a misleading presentation of the facts or outright misinformation.

The conservative media also skewed what the filing said. For example, Durham's filing never used the word "infiltrate." And it never claimed that Joffe's company was being paid by the Clinton campaign.

Most important, contrary to the reporting, the filing never said the White House data that came under scrutiny was from the Trump era. According to lawyers for David Dagon, a Georgia Institute of Technology data scientist who helped develop the Yota analysis, the data — so-called DNS logs, which are records of when computers or smartphones have prepared to communicate with servers over the internet — came from Barack Obama's presidency.

"What Trump and some news outlets are saying is wrong," said Jody Westby and Mark Rasch, lawyers for Dagon. "The cybersecurity researchers were investigating malware in the White House, not spying on the Trump campaign, and to our knowledge, all of the data they used was nonprivate DNS data from before Trump took office."

 

[kookbreaker]

Another nothingburger from our resident righties. File it next to Fauci’s emails as the next thing they’ll be bringing up for months without actually knowing anything other than what OANN told them.

 

[Dr. Keith]

Are you just hopping from thread to thread trying to "Buttery Mails" each one?

Did Durham release any actual evidence recently? I've seen the headlines but has someone been arrested, indicted, or anything?

Yes, no, and no.

Sorry, I thought this was the Trivia thread. My bad.

 

[Dr. Keith]

Yes. Let's take a closer look at that conviction...



So, basically this FBI lawyer took an "inappropriate shortcut" without active intent to harm, not acting with political bias, likely believing what he said to be true, admitted and apologized for it and you're taking a victory lap?

Is that a process crime?

Or do you have to kiss Trumps ring to get that label. I can’t remember all the elements.