True skeptics are 'conspiracy theorists'

[defaultdotxbe]

Facts are absolute

stundie might have something to say about that one, lol

 

[JonnyFive]

3)You have no degree in any field of scientific study.

I thought he claimed to have a degree in biology... or something.

 

[Civilized Worm]

A creationist with a degree in biology? Next you'll be telling me that Stundie is a structural engineer!

 

[Davidjayjordan]

Crucifixion? Funny for most, how did you know. Ah, true skeptics are funny guys.

?

I repeat crucifixion is not funny, but false skeptics and those that are groupies or into their mob congregational atmosphere love to mock and crucify. This is why they are so moldable, so controlable, so pliable and useable by their masters and controllers.

This is why they are so useful, as they will parrot what the mob leaders start them off with.

And so HERE, you have just learned a Bible lesson on human nature. The weak kneed false skeptics parrot that crucifixion is funny, and so would so easily fit into the crowds that were swayed into crying CRUCIFY HIM, CRUCIFY HIM

Nothing new, mobs will be mobs and dumb as ever, and as controlled as ever.

Now you know why there are conspiracies because dumb people can be conned and lead down the garden path.

 

[AZCat]

Now you know why there are conspiracies because dumb people can be conned and lead down the garden path.

No, there are conspiracy theories because dumb people can be conned and lead down the garden path.

 

[NeoRicen]

Alright that's it.

A 'true' skeptic is NOTHING, they aren't conspiracy theorists, they aren't anti-conspiracy theorist, they take everything on a case by case basis based SOLEY on the evidence at hand.

Davidjayjordan, you are the complete OPPOSITE to a skeptic, you have demonstrated no actual evidence for any case of a so called conspiracy. You've admitted that basically all conspiracy theories must be true despite NO evidence and regardless of ANY other factor.

You sir are the false skeptic and it's about time you shut up or give some evidence for at least one case of so called conspiracy.

PS: There are NO major conspiracies becasue smart people still exist and they'd get caught. No one in any relative field to a conspiracy has ever been conned into them. Your reason for conspiracies happening is completely wrong. It is soley the dumb people who believe them, the top experts and scientists ALL disagree with the conspiracies because THEY have the knowledge to asses the truth on a purely scientific and skeptical basis. Also the MAJOR red flag about why conspiracies theories are followed is because you people are WAY to open minded, you believe EVERYTHING, the biggest indicator is your website. Is there anything you DON'T believe (besides decent design sense)?

 

[Davidjayjordan]

No, there are conspiracy theories because dumb people can be conned and lead down the garden path.

Smart people see through conspiracies and lies, dumb people that think they are smart join groups which teach them that there are no conspiracy theories and that their governments love them and tell them all truth.

 

[Davidjayjordan]

Alright that's it.

A 'true' skeptic is NOTHING, they aren't conspiracy theorists, they aren't anti-conspiracy theorist, they take everything on a case by case basis based SOLEY on the evidence at hand. (But flase skeptics have to deny all important conspiracies, otherwise they would leave their conmfort zone and be responsible to seariously search and change their allegiances in life. false skeptics love the status quo, and love to think they are smart, when they are naive and extremely dumb, being lead entirely by their closed minded motivation...of don;t rock the boat, and don;t bite the hand that feeds them)

Davidjayjordan, you are the complete OPPOSITE to a skeptic, (Complete opposite to a false skeptic. TRUE) you have demonstrated no actual evidence for any case of a so called conspiracy. (I am giving you the overall principle HERE, and why, not a conspiracy but why fanti-truthersd, don;t look for truths)

You've admitted that basically all conspiracy theories must be true despite NO evidence and regardless of ANY other factor. (Not so, as mentioned you have to discern each and everyone, but the basic principle is that there is a conspiracy against lower level citizens, as the rich and powerful obviously don't tell the truth or give away free wealth and power. Only the naive think such)

You sir are the false skeptic and it's about time you shut up or give some evidence for at least one case of so called conspiracy. (There was no magic bullet. Kennedy was shot for thinking about stopping the war machine of the rich and powerful. There was no magic bullet. Get REAL, and study and discern and BE HONEST.)

To be a true skeptic, it takes intellectual honesty. False skeptics are fearful and gutless and afraid, complacent and lazy. And yet all the while, telling themselves that they are smart, or the smart ones telling them the lies are smart enough to be able to mold and continue on with these lies.

 

[Z]

To be a true skeptic, it takes intellectual honesty. False skeptics are fearful and gutless and afraid, complacent and lazy. And yet all the while, telling themselves that they are smart, or the smart ones telling them the lies are smart enough to be able to mold and continue on with these lies.

Here's how skepticism works:

A claim is made, and you do the research yourself to find out if there is a reason to accept that claim, even provisionally. The earth is round? OK, we look at the evidence: measurements made by a variety of instruments, observations of astronauts, careful mapping to determine where, if anywhere, there is an edge...

If you are unable to do that research yourself, there are two paths available to you: one, you can provisionally dismiss the claim, since you are unable to personally verify it; or two, you can provisionally accept the claim, either because you have no evidence against it, or because you are willing to accept the evidence presented by others.

That's all there is to it.

Now, as it stands, you have made, on your website and here, a number of claims, which, as of yet, are unsupported by the evidence, if any, that you have offered. Since the claims you have made often go directly against evidence offered by researchers in a variety of fields, whom we have no reason as of yet to suspect of error or deception, your claims have been provisionally dismissed. Further, there is an improved bias against accepting your claims, since some evidence you have presented has been demonstrably false, since you have been caught in a number of outright lies, and since your precognitive abilities - specifically, about the coming of the Apocalypse - have been demonstrably incorrect as well. Hence, current and future claims you have made or will made exist under an immediate shadow of doubt.

Since being called out on your false prophecies and lies, all you've done is whined and moaned about 'false skeptics' versus 'true skeptics', all the while failing to offer any evidence whatsoever, one way or another, for anything you say. In fact, you've essentially become a one-trick pony, and your every post - especially since your suspension - carries the air of a whining child demanding undue attention, like a tantrum.

Either get over your tantrum, reenter the discussions you have started anew, and begin providing evidence, or do the forum a favor and take your whining and naysaying to some site where people might take heed of your terms.

If you had a mission here, that mission has failed, miserably. If you had something you wanted to discuss here, you've failed at that as well, since all you're doing now is insulting and naysaying.

You claim to be a man of action; demonstrate this.

The gauntlet has been thrown down; either accept it or be recognized as a whining child.

 

[gumboot]

And so HERE, you have just learned a Bible lesson on human nature. The weak kneed false skeptics parrot that crucifixion is funny, and so would so easily fit into the crowds that were swayed into crying CRUCIFY HIM, CRUCIFY HIM

Ah, now here your wrong indeed. Do you know why those people were chanting that? Religion.

Religion is mother of ignorance and blind following. Religion is the mother of hatred and suffering.

Your God calls himself the shepherd. You know why? Because his followers are sheep.

-Gumboot

 

[gumboot]

Crucifixion is torture, a slow death.

This is why they were going to pierce jesus side with a spear but he was already dead.

They had to get the crucified on that day down so as not to pollute the Sabbath Day for the dam religious ones that pretended righteousness but within were murders. You know the type. For they got the mob to cry ctucify him, like here. And they got the mob to mock the Lord, like those here ...mocking crucifixion.

All you're likely to do with reactions like this is encourage people to mock it some more.

I repeat crucifixion is not something FUNNY.

Well it all depends on perspective, doesn't it. Always look on the bright side of death, and all that.

Apparrently there postings are alllowed and deemed appropriate according to the rules HERE, but with the Lord he remembers such words from a foolish heart.

We are judged by our words.

Words are important, so choose your words wiser posters....and do not mock crucifixion as if it is funny.

Frankly, if your god does exist, and that's a big if, and if he is indeed at all the way he is portrayed (which, really, he must be, to be your god), frankly I don't want to have anything to do with him. Given what he's like, I can appreciate Lucifer's stance on the entire matter, and wouldn't mind joining Ye Ole Prince of Darkness to gave another crack and upsetting the Status Quo. Simply put, your God's a [rule8].

-Gumboot

 

[Davidjayjordan]

Here's how skepticism works:

A claim is made, and you do the research yourself to find out if there is a reason to accept that claim, even provisionally. The earth is round? OK, we look at the evidence: measurements made by a variety of instruments, observations of astronauts, careful mapping to determine where, if anywhere, there is an edge...

If you are unable to do that research yourself, there are two paths available to you: If you had a mission here, that mission has failed, miserably. If you had something you wanted to discuss here, you've failed at that as well, since all you're doing now is insulting and naysaying.

You claim to be a man of action; demonstrate this.

The gauntlet has been thrown down; either accept it or be recognized as a whining child.

yes, the majority of you are whiners, who keep saying you can;t figure out anything and therefore are left with the inevitable conclusion that your governments and the rich and powerful love you and would never tell you any lies. So yes, you have a dilemna to solve, whether to go on in ignorance or get real and study with depth and an open mind.

But I can't help those that are unwilling to help themselves, NO ONE CAN, but you yourselves. This forum was created for a purpose and you should understand that purpose.

But please stop the whining. I hate whiners and whimps that say they can;t figure out anything. I like people with courage of conviction that stand behind what they think rather than always being subservient to their controlling masters.

 

[Davidjayjordan]

All you're likely to do with reactions like this is encourage people to mock it some more.


Well it all depends on perspective, doesn't it. Always look on the bright side of death, and all that.

((Again crucifixion is not funny, unless you have proof that it is.))





Frankly, if your god does exist, and that's a big if, and if he is indeed at all the way he is portrayed (which, really, he must be, to be your god), frankly I don't want to have anything to do with him. Given what he's like, I can appreciate Lucifer's stance on the entire matter, and wouldn't mind joining Ye Ole Prince of Darkness to gave another crack and upsetting the Status Quo. Simply put, your God's a [rule8].

-Gumboot

Actually your religious views are really not on topic HERE on this thread, we are talking about why anti-truthers are so againjst truths and why they are so lazy and subservient and why they won;t study and learn.

But on the Religious Board if you have queries abouit a loving God, and the lving example of Jesus, do ask them there. This is a anti-conspiracy forum where anti-truths are meant to be approved and propagated.

 

[Z]

yes, the majority of you are whiners, who keep saying you can;t figure out anything and therefore are left with the inevitable conclusion that your governments and the rich and powerful love you and would never tell you any lies. So yes, you have a dilemna to solve, whether to go on in ignorance or get real and study with depth and an open mind.

But I can't help those that are unwilling to help themselves, NO ONE CAN, but you yourselves. This forum was created for a purpose and you should understand that purpose.

But please stop the whining. I hate whiners and whimps that say they can;t figure out anything. I like people with courage of conviction that stand behind what they think rather than always being subservient to their controlling masters.

Thank you... you are now recognized as a whining child.

There is nothing more to say to you. Welcome to ignore.

 

[Paulhoff]

if you have queries abouit a loving God,

No but this child has a few questions.......

All your so-called god has to do is feed him, nobody can stop him, we're waiting.........

Paul

 

[Foster Zygote]

Smart people see through conspiracies and lies, dumb people that think they are smart join groups which teach them that there are no conspiracy theories and that their governments love them and tell them all truth.

Actually, I would think that dumb people might think that because someone dismisses their theories due to lack of evidence as well as contradictory evidence that therefor those people don't believe that conspiracies of any kind exist. Of course smart people know that conspiracies occur often. Ever heard of R.I.C.O.? But smart people know that a conspiracy theory must be supported by evidence.

Also, I would think that dumb people tend to make straw men rather than admit the lack of evidence for their own dumb ideas. The dumb say things like "Well if you don;t believe that the government is engaged in cartoonish super-villainy then you obviously think that the government always has our best interests in mind and want to give each and every one of us a big hug". The dumb person would, I expect, make such a statement with no more supporting evidence than he/she had for his/her conspiracy theory. Of course smart people can think that the Bush administration had no conspiratorial involvement in the 9/11 attacks but is still perhaps the worst presidential administration in US history, making even Warren Harding look competent by comparison. A smart person knows that even though W. had nothing to do with 9/11 beyond negligence he still doesn't give a crap about that dying boy and his mother in the above post.

 

[Miss Anthrope]

Here's how skepticism works:

A claim is made, and you do the research yourself to find out if there is a reason to accept that claim, even provisionally. The earth is round? OK, we look at the evidence: measurements made by a variety of instruments, observations of astronauts, careful mapping to determine where, if anywhere, there is an edge...

If you are unable to do that research yourself, there are two paths available to you: one, you can provisionally dismiss the claim, since you are unable to personally verify it; or two, you can provisionally accept the claim, either because you have no evidence against it, or because you are willing to accept the evidence presented by others.

That's all there is to it.

Now, as it stands, you have made, on your website and here, a number of claims, which, as of yet, are unsupported by the evidence, if any, that you have offered. Since the claims you have made often go directly against evidence offered by researchers in a variety of fields, whom we have no reason as of yet to suspect of error or deception, your claims have been provisionally dismissed. Further, there is an improved bias against accepting your claims, since some evidence you have presented has been demonstrably false, since you have been caught in a number of outright lies, and since your precognitive abilities - specifically, about the coming of the Apocalypse - have been demonstrably incorrect as well. Hence, current and future claims you have made or will made exist under an immediate shadow of doubt.

Since being called out on your false prophecies and lies, all you've done is whined and moaned about 'false skeptics' versus 'true skeptics', all the while failing to offer any evidence whatsoever, one way or another, for anything you say. In fact, you've essentially become a one-trick pony, and your every post - especially since your suspension - carries the air of a whining child demanding undue attention, like a tantrum.

Either get over your tantrum, reenter the discussions you have started anew, and begin providing evidence, or do the forum a favor and take your whining and naysaying to some site where people might take heed of your terms.

If you had a mission here, that mission has failed, miserably. If you had something you wanted to discuss here, you've failed at that as well, since all you're doing now is insulting and naysaying.

You claim to be a man of action; demonstrate this.

The gauntlet has been thrown down; either accept it or be recognized as a whining child.

 

[JonnyFive]

If you are unable to do that research yourself, there are two paths available to you: one, you can provisionally dismiss the claim, since you are unable to personally verify it; or two, you can provisionally accept the claim, either because you have no evidence against it, or because you are willing to accept the evidence presented by others.

That's all there is to it.

Now, as it stands, you have made, on your website and here, a number of claims, which, as of yet, are unsupported by the evidence, if any, that you have offered. Since the claims you have made often go directly against evidence offered by researchers in a variety of fields, whom we have no reason as of yet to suspect of error or deception, your claims have been provisionally dismissed. Further, there is an improved bias against accepting your claims, since some evidence you have presented has been demonstrably false, since you have been caught in a number of outright lies, and since your precognitive abilities - specifically, about the coming of the Apocalypse - have been demonstrably incorrect as well. Hence, current and future claims you have made or will made exist under an immediate shadow of doubt.

I'll take the liberty of speaking for DJJ:

Do you want to be spoon-fed, Z-is-the-last-letter-of-the-alphabet? Are you a true skeptic or do you worship the god of the sheeple, James Randi?

There you go.

 

[Z]

I'll take the liberty of speaking for DJJ:

Do you want to be spoon-fed, Z-is-the-last-letter-of-the-alphabet? Are you a true skeptic or do you worship the god of the sheeple, James Randi?

There you go.

Eh, he already replied. He didn't respond, per se, but he replied. And, as expected, his reply was more of the same - the empty and meaningless whinings of a child desperately clinging to a fantasy world in the face of the crushing weight of a reality that recognizes him as, ultimately, an unimportant and meaningless person.

 

[JonnyFive]

Eh, he already replied. He didn't respond, per se, but he replied. And, as expected, his reply was more of the same - the empty and meaningless whinings of a child desperately clinging to a fantasy world in the face of the crushing weight of a reality that recognizes him as, ultimately, an unimportant and meaningless person.

Oh, my bad.

He is surprisingly child-like, for someone that claims to be older and wiser than most of the rest of us.

I have to wonder if he's really some kid, playing at being a grown-up to try to garner respect. At least I'm honest about my age, even if I'm not a hojillion-year-old ancient Chinese sage.