Tory lead continues to shrink

Just had a look and I'm pretty sure that Lord Paul is not the vice-chairman of the Labour party and is not working on the up-coming general election campaign....

Tories said:
NO SHUT UP THEY ARE THE SAME AS US THEY ARE JUST AS BAD LOOK!!!
Hmm.

<votes lib dem>
 
The membership card with Clause IV on it or the new one?

The former [1]. Though to be honest, I've never been a Labour member or voter. The aims of the original version might be unrealistic* judging by today's standards, but I get a sense of the dynamism in those early years of the socialist movement in Britain. By comparison the new version they came up with is just weazelly, typical New Labour guff. I feel sick reading it.

* - I still support the nationalisation of the utilities, rail, etc.

[1] - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clause_IV
 
Last edited:
I just feel essential services should be operated by the state for the common good
They have public service requirements that are intended to achieve just that. Public ownership isn't necessarily a good way to achieve it (and some people believe that public ownership is a recipe for waste and failure to achieve it).
 
They have public service requirements that are intended to achieve just that. Public ownership isn't necessarily a good way to achieve it (and some people believe that public ownership is a recipe for waste and failure to achieve it).

It doesn't look like private ownership has exactly been a rip-roaring success either. It's just that now we get to see poor service and high prices coupled with what seem to be rather healthy profits for shareholders.
 
Didn't Blair privatise huge swathes of the NHS? The Government have no control over the buildings themselves, as I understand it, just what occurs within it.
 
It doesn't look like private ownership has exactly been a rip-roaring success either. It's just that now we get to see poor service and high prices coupled with what seem to be rather healthy profits for shareholders.
Well not BT or BA shareholders, and certainly not Railtrack shareholders . . .
 

Back
Top Bottom