• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Cont: Today's Mass Shooting (part 3)

Hmm... yeah. Just heard about it (KC shooting). Had a number of people on my FB in KC (both living there and visiting), but so far no one that was near Union Station at the time.
 
Last edited:
Not saying you're wrong (48 hour rule), but curious as to why you think so. With 18 confirmed gunshot wounds it seems like it may be more than one shooter.

Just a guess. I'm prepared to be wrong.

There have definitely been some mass shootings in the past committed by a single shooter where more than 18 people were shot.

Latest info seems to be that there are now 3 people who have been arrested, and a source says that it "appeared to be the result of an argument that turned violent" and not terrorism.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-68248172

If that's the case, I could well be wrong.
 
Video shows the 3 suspects being arrested.

Anyone who has viewed this forum in the recent years knows exactly what they're going to see in the video.

BBC is reporting that 9 of the gunshot victims are children. Or, as some not so smart cookies like to say, "gang members."

There is also a video of a parade viewer chasing and tackling one of the shooters. If you watch the video, pay attention to the size of the gun a woman picks up after the shooter was tackled.
 
Well, we sort of know that it wasn't just one guy involved, here. No clue on skin color, but I wouldn't be interested in speculating, anyway. WTF does that have to do with it?

I suspect if you've heard the other weird news from KC recently (people froze to death during/after a party, also related to football fans), some might have speculated that differently if they hadn't seen pictures (all white). But why does it matter enough to speculate, anyway?

If a mass shooting and there are more killed than wounded, it's probably a white or non-black guy. If a mass shooting and there are more wounded than killed, it's probably a black guy. This may be due to poor marksmanship. But I'd speculate that the motives are different. The black guy wants to cap someone who has disrespected him, so lots of collateral but non-fatal bystander wounds. The white/non-black guy is usually on a suicide mission and wants to maximize the carnage.
 
Last edited:


Stay on topic

Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: jimbob
 
People want to blame the inanimate object, but paroxysms of violence like in KC could happen just as well with knives. It's easy to imagine a almost two-dozen bystanders injured in the cross-stab. It's a proven fact that guns deter violence, which is why I question whether or not this even happened at all. The scriptwriters gave Taylor Swift, Pfizer and the spotted zombie in the White House a victory, then decided to gild the lily for an encore.
 
Just a guess. I'm prepared to be wrong.

There have definitely been some mass shootings in the past committed by a single shooter where more than 18 people were shot.

Latest info seems to be that there are now 3 people who have been arrested, and a source says that it "appeared to be the result of an argument that turned violent" and not terrorism.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-68248172

If that's the case, I could well be wrong.

Interesting take and information by the Black Conservative Perspective.




Not sure what the reference to "young astronauts" and "Young Scholars" is other than youth.
 
Breaking news, shooting at the Superbowl Parade in Kansas City Mo. 10 shot, one confirmed dead, two armed people detained ...

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-new...per-bowl-celebration-union-station-rcna138883

48-hour rule, but I’m guessing that there was only one shooter.

Well, waddaya know. There were apparently 800 police attending this parade, and any number of civilians who were legally carrying. All of them no doubt "good guys with a gun". And yet none of them, not one, stopped a couple of "bad guys with a gun" killing and injuring innocent folks, including children, out having a good time celebrating. What more proof is needed that this stupid NRA meme is just that - ******* stupid.
 
Well, waddaya know. There were apparently 800 police attending this parade, and any number of civilians who were legally carrying. All of them no doubt "good guys with a gun". And yet none of them, not one, stopped a couple of "bad guys with a gun" killing and injuring innocent folks, including children, out having a good time celebrating. What more proof is needed that this stupid NRA meme is just that - ******* stupid.

Logic fail.

These minds are not changed by such trivialities as "proof" and "reality".

Irrelevant ad hominem in response to logic fail.

Keep up the quality posting guys.
 
Listen guys, just because there is no evidence that supports the "good guy with a gun" argument and there is a cubic butt-ton of evidence that disproves it doesn't mean what you're saying is logical....
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom