Cont: Today's Mass Shooting (part 3)

[Bogative]

Coulter, eh? Then it MUST be true! LOL

In case you forgot, she was right the last time she made the claim. She went on "Real Time" shortly after the Super Bowl parade shooting and said the shooters were probably not white because the police and media hadn't identified them yet.

As usual, the left-wing hyenas went into full retard mode with their laughter, dismissiveness and cries of racism.

She was right.

 

[bluesjnr]

Coulter, eh? Then it MUST be true! LOL

What is it you think your arguing against?

 

[bluesjnr]

Duplicate, but probably necessary

What? Why?

I just don't understand what you think you're achieving, what point you are making?

 

[Darat]

In case you forgot, she was right the last time she made the claim. She went on "Real Time" shortly after the Super Bowl parade shooting and said the shooters were probably not white because the police and media hadn't identified them yet.

As usual, the left-wing hyenas went into full retard mode with their laughter, dismissiveness and cries of racism.

She was right.

Nope neither she nor you presented any evidence to show your claim of what you call her "rule" is predictive.

 

[bluesjnr]

Nope neither she nor you presented any evidence to show your claim of what you call her "rule" is predictive.

Why is this remotely important?

 

[Norman Alexander]

Why is this remotely important?

Indeed. Why IS Coulter even remotely important.

 

[sir drinks-a-lot]

Indeed. Why IS Coulter even remotely important.

As you should know, we should evaluate claims of ideas not on the basis of who is presenting them (since that is fallacious), but rather on whether or not the ideas have any merit of their own.

Coulter's Law, as it is called, states that the longer it takes the news media to identify a mass shooter in the United States, the less likely it is to be a white male.

 

[Norman Alexander]

As you should know, we should evaluate claims of ideas not on the basis of who is presenting them (since that is fallacious), but rather on whether or not the ideas have any merit of their own.

Coulter's Law, as it is called, states that the longer it takes the news media to identify a mass shooter in the United States, the less likely it is to be a white male.

The presenter of this "law" is a biased ****-stirrer. To me, that puts it well beyond any acceptable credibility.

And this "law" is demonstrably utter crap. No evidence it holds at all, just some pronouncement.

 

[sir drinks-a-lot]

And this "law" is demonstrably iutter crap.

Can you demonstrate that for us then?

 

[Ron Obvious]

Coulter, eh? Then it MUST be true! LOL

Not, because it's Coulter, no. But you can't deny the observation seems to hold true.

 

[Norman Alexander]

Can you demonstrate that for us then?

The requirement on the claimant is to show their claim is true. No refutation required.

Away you go.

 

[Darat]

Not, because it's Coulter, no. But you can't deny the observation seems to hold true.

How does it “seems to hold true”? Absolutely no evidence presented for the claim, so at the moment it isn’t a matter of me denying rather you supporting the claim.

 

[Norman Alexander]

Not, because it's Coulter, no. But you can't deny the observation seems to hold true.

I sure can. Using the same reasoning that Coulter used: Because I say so.

 

[Trausti]

How does it “seems to hold true”? Absolutely no evidence presented for the claim, so at the moment it isn’t a matter of me denying rather you supporting the claim.

Well, maybe test Coulter's law the next time there's a reported shooting. Does the report prominently note the race of the shooter, or does the report prefer not to mention?

 

[novaphile]

Well, maybe test Coulter's law the next time there's a reported shooting. Does the report prominently note the race of the shooter, or does the report prefer not to mention?

No, the test is to take all shootings that make it into the media, the race of the shooter, and for each shooting record the length of time between the first reports, and the announcement of the race of the shooter.

This would be pretty easy to do, probably a handful of media studies students could get it done in a month.

One, cherry picked, example of anything, proves nothing.

 

[Bogative]

Here we go. The 1st shooter has been identified as Kahbir Oglesby Hicks. Definitely not a MAGAr anti-Islamic white supremacist. He is what an ISF skeptic will someday call a victim of over incarceration.

https://6abc.com/kahbir-oglesby-hic...al-fitr-event-clara-muhammad-square/14647960/


The other 4 soon to be victims of over incarceration have not yet been identified.

 

[sir drinks-a-lot]

The requirement on the claimant is to show their claim is true.

Cool. Here's your claim:

"This law is demonstrably utter crap. No evidence it holds at all, just some pronouncement."

Now, show it's true.

 

[Venom]

Here we go. The 1st shooter has been identified as Kahbir Oglesby Hicks. Definitely not a MAGAr anti-Islamic white supremacist. He is what an ISF skeptic will someday call a victim of over incarceration.

https://6abc.com/kahbir-oglesby-hic...al-fitr-event-clara-muhammad-square/14647960/


The other 4 soon to be victims of over incarceration have not yet been identified.

90 percent of your examples in this thread have been instances of group violence. They only count for this thread because of the interesting way "mass shooting" is sometimes defined.

We get it...you're pushing back on the racist white boy shooter narrative some people have when it comes to rampage killings. Rest assured this is mostly due to demographics. There is still a white majority in the U.S., a country with a lot of guns and a toxic gun culture. And there is no shortage of rampage killings done by other types of people.

 

[Norman Alexander]

Cool. Here's your claim:

"This law is demonstrably utter crap. No evidence it holds at all, just some pronouncement."

Now, show it's true.

Nope. Stop trying to make it MY claim. It's Coulter's claim, her "Law". Up to her to prove it. Otherwise it's just some clueless airhead yammering on TV. There's PLENTY of those around the world.

 

[Darat]

Well, maybe test Coulter's law the next time there's a reported shooting. Does the report prominently note the race of the shooter, or does the report prefer not to mention?

I assume Coulter or those who believe in her rule will have already checked whether it is true or not, please share the evidence that convinced you it was true.