Today In FreeperLand

[UnrepentantSinner]

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2263790/posts?q=1&;page=51

Your little simile tag-line is saying that ID destroys evolution akin to how socialism destroys free markets, YES?

How many socialists would subscribe to creationism vs. darwinism?

And speaking of free markets, how does THAT fit with the left suing and stifling all dissent anytime their cult is examined a little too closely for them?

It seriously tickles me that these loons don't understand evolution is the liberal position, no matter how many times they smear creation/ID.

In the liberal world, down is up, up is down.

The tagline might as well scream....LOOK-AT-ME...I'M A LIBERAL! (And dunce and liberal are interchangeable.)

 

[UnrepentantSinner]

And some poop throwing concerning Ida.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/2262243/posts

This should provide much fun for liberal Darwinists to waste endless amounts of time drawing and designing imaginary charts and models to justify their fornication and adolescent masturbatory fantasies. The drive behind it is sexual and adolescent anxiety to be liberated from conventional morality. The obsessive-compulsives among them have the greatest need for plotting the prehistoric fossil graphs for this rationalization. It's a very strange phenomenon since no fossil could ever prove the non-existence of God, the apparent goal of these obsessions. As the dorks' quest for the missing link to justify a world without God or morality rages on, in the end, it's just a darn monkey skeleton.

And in the same thread, an appeal to "common sense".

I think what is missing from the discussion is a level of precision commensurate with the subject. The darwinians tend to rely upon data that is hundreds of years old, and is based upon an argument by association, one of the weakest forms of argument. If one looks at the wonderful heirarchy of life forms, the “tree of life” as it were, one could either say that the species were created similar for the sake of a beautiful harmony, the eternal music of the cosmos as Plato would say, or one could say the similarities are the result of random mutations which led to new life forms from common sources. We now have the ability to test this theory by looking at the DNA sequences, to see if the billions of lines of code from one species are off from the billions of lines of code from the “next” species by a few random mutations. Then we can do the math, the probability and statistics to verify that even one species gap could have occurred in the time alloted by the age of the universe. It is quite simple, I don’t think there is any need to rely upon crude out-dated evolutionary storyboards found in most natural history museums.

 

[Travis]

I have yet to figure out what in the hell a "Darwinist" is. Though these are Freepers so I wouldn't be surprised if they don't know what it is either.

 

[GreyICE]

I have yet to figure out what in the hell a "Darwinist" is. Though these are Freepers so I wouldn't be surprised if they don't know what it is either.

Someone who believes in Charles Darwin. Most people don't understand that Darwin was a conspiracy started in the early 19th century by several masonic lodges that got a little out of control. The actual Charles Darwin was a little-known chimney-sweep-broom repair man who kept songbirds in empty coal bins and used to amuse children by taking them out and showing them around.