• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Time to kick Iran

So did someone spotted a threat yet? Because the Woo-mongering
is getting boring. So far the facts are merely what I posted already:


The Big Lie: “Iran Is a Threat”
Full Article: http://irancoverage.com/2007/10/09/t...n-is-a-threat/

Putin rejects Iran nuclear claims
Full Article: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7037390.stm

[SIZE=-1]Iran says will work with IAEA to avert sanctions [/SIZE]
Full Article:
http://africa.reuters.com/world/news/usnBLA029148.html

BUSH Has Accepted Ethnic Cleansing
Full Article: http://www.spiegel.de/international/...508394,00.html
 
How many of you here going on about how bad Iran/Ahmadinejad is would be willing to pick up a gun and a helmet and walk across the Iranian border to commence the killing?

I wouldn't, and I wouldn't expect anyone else to. But I am not opposed in any way to pressing buttons that send automated weapons into action across that same border.

Unfortunately, the majority of those in control of the U.S. military don't have that sentiment, which is why so many of our troops have died and will die pointlessly.
 
Please answer this.


I don't see a US-National threat in it. Quite the opposite:
We all know how Gay's were treated in the US in the last decades,
don't we?

Does that mean you're okay with killing xxx,xxx Iraqis but complain
about xx gays being killed in Iran??? :confused:
 
Does that mean you're okay with killing xxx,xxx Iraqis but complain
about xx gays being killed in Iran??? :confused:

As you know Oliver, I am not a fan of either. I have the opinion that a country that claims itself to be the beacon of liberty and the respect for the dignity of human life should not rush into a war that will lead to such a terrible loss of life and human potential. It doesn't make my argument the right one, but it is my opinion nonetheless, and always will be.

I don't see a US-National threat in it. Quite the opposite:
We all know how Gay's were treated in the US in the last decades,
don't we?

But the point still is Oliver, would you defend the words of Bush if he announced, infront of many hundreds of people 'They shout 'Death to the Homosexuals' instead of 'I shout 'Death to the Homosexuals'. I am right in my assumption you would come onto JREF and quite rightly denounce Bush for this abomination of speech am I not? The fact that we both know you would is proof that we both know you have an incredible bias towards America and George Bush, and not equally call Mahmoud.A a terrible man who is irresponsible in a world so confused and gun-ready.

Please answer, would you see no threat towards Gays after what Bush in a hypothetical sense said?
 
I don't see a US-National threat in it. Quite the opposite:
We all know how Gay's were treated in the US in the last decades,
don't we?
We do, you don't, apparently. Perhaps you were confusing the US with Germany, who did actually put homosexuals to death?

Does that mean you're okay with killing xxx,xxx Iraqis but complain
about xx gays being killed in Iran??? :confused:
False dichotomy.
 
We do, you don't, apparently. Perhaps you were confusing the US with Germany, who did actually put homosexuals to death?

False dichotomy.


So the Threat concerning Iran are the gay people? :confused:
You're kidding me, right?

We both know that all the Woo-Propaganda isn't about
the US. It's about a possible threat for Israel, right?

So where is even the evidence for a possible threat
for Israel??? A burning Israel-Flag? :rolleyes:
 
Why no answer Oliver?


I already told you that I wouldn't endorse such comments...

But that doesn't justify...

- War Mongering
- Making up imaginary threats
- Passing resolutions based on opinion
- Killing x-thousands of people
- and so on ....

Does it?
 
I already told you that I wouldn't endorse such comments...

But that doesn't justify...

- War Mongering
- Making up imaginary threats
- Passing resolutions based on opinion
- Killing x-thousands of people
- and so on ....

Does it?

You still haven't answered the last sentence in post 1766. Please do so.
 
You still haven't answered the last sentence in post 1766. Please do so.


Argh ... this one?

Would you see no threat towards Gays after what Bush in a hypothetical sense said?


Quite frankly - I don't care about 1000 Gays if the life of
hundred-thousands is at stake...


Where is the Threat for the US??? :confused:
 
Quite frankly - I don't care about 1000 Gays if the life of
hundred-thousands is at stake...

No, 'Would you see no threat towards Gays after what Bush in a hypothetical sense said? ' Why can you not answer it? You can do a simple yes or no .
 
No, 'Would you see no threat towards Gays after what Bush in a hypothetical sense said? ' Why can you not answer it? You can do a simple yes or no .


I see a threat in everything Bush says about foreign policies
since he doesn't even know the difference between Australia
and Austria (like most Americans).

What's your point since the Issue isn't about gays anyway?
It's about "Nuclear Holocaust, Evildoers, Axis of Evil, Terrorists,
Terror-States" and the same BS as in Iraq again.

Ahmadinejad doesn't control the nuclear program.
He isn't the head of the state...
Iran is obeying to the IAEA rules...

Ergo - and you might be able to follow if you're a skeptic - he can whine
all day long - his words doesn't matter anyway...


Where is "Teh Threat"???
 
Last edited:
So the Threat concerning Iran are the gay people? :confused:
You're kidding me, right?

We both know that all the Woo-Propaganda isn't about
the US. It's about a possible threat for Israel, right?

So where is even the evidence for a possible threat
for Israel??? A burning Israel-Flag? :rolleyes:
Did you accidentally quote my post? Because this answer makes no sense at all, a complete non-sequitur. Would you like to try again, and actually make a bit of sense this time?
 
Did you accidentally quote my post? Because this answer makes no sense at all, a complete non-sequitur. Would you like to try again, and actually make a bit of sense this time?


No - it wasn't an accident. What's the threat for the US? ... Well??? :confused:
 
I see a threat in everything Bush says about foreign policies
since he doesn't even know the difference between Australia
and Austria (like most Americans).

What's your point since the Issue isn't about gays anyway?
It's about "Nuclear Holocaust, Evildoers, Axis of Evil, Terrorists,
Terror-States" and the same BS as in Iraq again.

Ahmadinejad doesn't control the nuclear program.
He isn't the head of the state...
Iran is obeying to the IAEA rules...

Ergo - and you might be able to follow if you're a skeptic - he can whine
all day long - his words doesn't matter anyway...


Where is "Teh Threat"???

Why can you not answer a simple hypothetical question and instead write all this? It will take 7-11 seconds of typing.

Again, 'Would you see no threat towards Gays after what Bush in a hypothetical sense said? '
 
No - it wasn't an accident. What's the threat for the US? ... Well??? :confused:
Why should I answer your post when you won't answer mine or anyone else's? You aren't interested in anything but pontificating and beating your chest, in fact you don't even appear to understand that this forum is here to actually discuss things.
 

Back
Top Bottom