.... You have picked your avatar well. ...
You're becoming almost Australian in your ability to use well-aimed humour to puncture self-righteous balloons. Good.
.... You have picked your avatar well. ...
So, If Bush said 'They shout 'DEATH TO HOMOSEXUALS'' you would defend him because he doesn't have a history of putting homosexuals to death? You wouldn't see any chance of a future threat in his statements?
How many of you here going on about how bad Iran/Ahmadinejad is would be willing to pick up a gun and a helmet and walk across the Iranian border to commence the killing?
Please answer this.
Does that mean you're okay with killing xxx,xxx Iraqis but complain
about xx gays being killed in Iran???![]()
I don't see a US-National threat in it. Quite the opposite:
We all know how Gay's were treated in the US in the last decades,
don't we?
We do, you don't, apparently. Perhaps you were confusing the US with Germany, who did actually put homosexuals to death?I don't see a US-National threat in it. Quite the opposite:
We all know how Gay's were treated in the US in the last decades,
don't we?
False dichotomy.Does that mean you're okay with killing xxx,xxx Iraqis but complain
about xx gays being killed in Iran???![]()
We do, you don't, apparently. Perhaps you were confusing the US with Germany, who did actually put homosexuals to death?
False dichotomy.
Why no answer Oliver?
I already told you that I wouldn't endorse such comments...
But that doesn't justify...
- War Mongering
- Making up imaginary threats
- Passing resolutions based on opinion
- Killing x-thousands of people
- and so on ....
Does it?
You still haven't answered the last sentence in post 1766. Please do so.
Would you see no threat towards Gays after what Bush in a hypothetical sense said?
Quite frankly - I don't care about 1000 Gays if the life of
hundred-thousands is at stake...
No, 'Would you see no threat towards Gays after what Bush in a hypothetical sense said? ' Why can you not answer it? You can do a simple yes or no .
Did you accidentally quote my post? Because this answer makes no sense at all, a complete non-sequitur. Would you like to try again, and actually make a bit of sense this time?So the Threat concerning Iran are the gay people?
You're kidding me, right?
We both know that all the Woo-Propaganda isn't about
the US. It's about a possible threat for Israel, right?
So where is even the evidence for a possible threat
for Israel??? A burning Israel-Flag?![]()
Did you accidentally quote my post? Because this answer makes no sense at all, a complete non-sequitur. Would you like to try again, and actually make a bit of sense this time?
I see a threat in everything Bush says about foreign policies
since he doesn't even know the difference between Australia
and Austria (like most Americans).
What's your point since the Issue isn't about gays anyway?
It's about "Nuclear Holocaust, Evildoers, Axis of Evil, Terrorists,
Terror-States" and the same BS as in Iraq again.
Ahmadinejad doesn't control the nuclear program.
He isn't the head of the state...
Iran is obeying to the IAEA rules...
Ergo - and you might be able to follow if you're a skeptic - he can whine
all day long - his words doesn't matter anyway...
Where is "Teh Threat"???
Why should I answer your post when you won't answer mine or anyone else's? You aren't interested in anything but pontificating and beating your chest, in fact you don't even appear to understand that this forum is here to actually discuss things.No - it wasn't an accident. What's the threat for the US? ... Well???![]()
Where is "Teh Threat"???