This place is overflowing with kooks.

Morphology

Unregistered
Joined
Dec 18, 2006
Messages
57
I’m sorry kids, but this place resembles a society of straight-thinking skeptics like Paris Hilton resembles virginity.

Let me guess: Operation Gladio (revealed in a series of Italian parliamentary investigations) was an “honest mistake”. That Nato intelligence and the ÇIA organized a “stay behind network” after WWII comprised of fascists who proceeded to blow up train stations and blame it on socialists was an “aberration”. That the Russian FSB was caught planting bombs in a building in order to demonize Chechnyians was a bizarre freak of nature. That Israelis were caught blowing up American and British targets in Egypt and trying to pin the blame on the “Moslem Brotherhood” was an unfortunate tactical error. That Hitler faked an attack on a German radio station and blamed it on Poles was a distinctly Hitlerian phenomenon. That the Gulf of Tonkin incident was similarly staged was a fantastical coincidence.

You have to be seriously…how should I put this -- retarded to look at the constant stream of false flag operations evidenced throughout history and then dismiss 911 skepticism.

As with the events of 7/7, on the day of 911 there were “war games” “simulating” attacks on the same targets in the same matter that occurred. The odds of this being a “coincidence” are astronomical. (You know, stars and stuff?)

You kids are completely and utterly ridiculous. I’m sorry to put it so bluntly but there it is. I briefly considered penning a wicked satire on pseudo-intellectual buffoonery after reading only a handful of threads on this forum. That you would piss on the graves of 911 families by not supporting them in their call for a new investigation is deeply shameful. That you affect an intellectual posture and a strident skepticism while swallowing the most bald-faced lies is simply laughable.

Time to grow up, kids.

“A scientific body to which had been confided the government of society would soon end by devoting itself no longer to science at all, but to quite another affair; and that affair, as in the case of all established powers, would be its own eternal perpetuation by rendering the society confided to its care ever more stupid and consequently more in need of its government and direction.”

Bakunin
 
You have to be seriously…how should I put this -- retarded to look at the constant stream of false flag operations evidenced throughout history and then dismiss 911 skepticism.

Fortunately, there's this stuff called "evidence". Because it would be equally...retarded...to look at the stream of false flag operations and simply assume that this was another.

Welcome to the forum. Take a look at some of the threads; use the search function; become familiar with what has already been said. Then, if you have anything new to bring to the table, bring it.
 
Operation Gladio? Wasn't that the plan to stop Spartacus from ravaging Rome? You mean - golly - this stuff goes all the way back to the Great Roman Empire? So Kirk Douglas - a Jooo - who also played Spartacus - is the focal point for the whole New World Order?

(I wonder how he shaves that chin dimple)
 
As with the events of 7/7, on the day of 911 there were “war games” “simulating” attacks on the same targets in the same matter that occurred. The odds of this being a “coincidence” are astronomical. (You know, stars and stuff?)
I've always been fascinated by this line of troofer logic, could you enlighten us retards how having a war game facilitates an actual attack?
 
Let me be the first to say that you must be seriously - how shall I put this - naïve to think that any of your false flag operations are a substitute for evidence on what happened during 9/11.


(ETA: Dang! In the 15 minutes it took me to work out this retort, I was beaten to the punch. I thought I would get the lucky "first post", this time!)
 
You have to be seriously…how should I put this -- retarded to look at the constant stream of false flag operations evidenced throughout history and then dismiss 911 skepticism.

As with the events of 7/7, on the day of 911 there were “war games” “simulating” attacks on the same targets in the same matter that occurred. The odds of this being a “coincidence” are astronomical. (You know, stars and stuff?)
Retarded?

Well, okay. Plainly we need your education. Please start by showing us the evidence that shows there were 'war games “simulating” attacks on the same targets in the same matter that occurred' on 9/11.
 
No..my friend. It is you and the 9-11 Deniars who are the kooks. For some psychological and emotional reasons, you all see the world as an evil, backstabbing, deceitful, untrustworthy place. Governmant cant be trusted, they are out to enslave you. There are conspiracies everywhere, from Zionists, to Freemasons, to Illuminati, to NWO, to PNAC, to Trilateral Commission, to CFR.

You live in a world where anyone could be an agent, a paid liar, an informant, a shill, etc etc.

Is it that hard for you to grasp why people look at you and see ultra-irrational paranoia? Ofcourse not. You have "the truth". You see "the light". Everyone else is a sheep, a slave, blind, stiff-necked, brain-washed..or worse....part of the conspiracy.

I feel really bad for ya dude. Seek help.
 
Retarded?

Well, okay. Plainly we need your education. Please start by showing us the evidence that shows there were 'war games “simulating” attacks on the same targets in the same matter that occurred' on 9/11.

Yes...please! Bet, he runs from this!
 
I've always been fascinated by this line of troofer logic, could you enlighten us retards how having a war game facilitates an actual attack?
its just another one of their clues that points in opposite directions

norad was ordered to stand down, but they were conducting drills to prepare for just the kind of attack that happened


of course truthers say they didnt know any of it was real, although transcripts of the conversations with ATC and NEADs seems to show this wasnt the case, it took all of 2 seconds for them to say "this is real life, not excercise"
 
That you would piss on the graves of 911 families by not supporting them in their call for a new investigation is deeply shameful.

The CTers call the family members who received phone calls from the planes liars. They insinuate that victims are in someway responsible for their own murder. Why don't you ask your CT buddies about Bernard Black, Sr.? They say he was off playing golf on 9/11, knowing full well his 11-year old son was to die that day on AA77.
 
Wow! There's so much jumping to conclusions in Morphology's post my eyballs have gone all googly. And it doesn't help that my eyes are rolling from his ad hominem arguments and appeal to pity.

Logic lesson #1, Morph: Just because A did B does not prove X did Y.
 
What's frustrating about so many of these people is that what they're saying sounds like skepticism. But it's not. The real things they should be skeptical about are dismissed because they're too boring (funding of education, congressional redistricting, environmental policy and sustainability, bloated, ineffective government programs, lobbyists...) and they seize on sci-fi conspiracy theories instead purely based on how much more fun and interesting they are.

There's plenty of "conspiracies" and back-door deals in Washington that need uncovering, money and favors changing hands and common people getting screwed in the process. But nobody's terribly interested in those, in energy policy and trade policy and product safety and lender responsibility in bankruptcy laws and all the other things that actually affect our daily lives.

"Hey! The roof is leaking! I think the roofer screwed us!"

"You're right! The roofer landed on our house in a UFO and knocked a hole in it!"

"What? No. I'm saying when he fixed the roof he didn't bother to-"

"YOU NEED TO WAKE UP, MAN! IT'S ALL PART OF THE ROOFER REPTILLIAN AGENDA!!!!"
 

Back
Top Bottom