I used to believe in them until I started to price the damn things. I mean, the more inaccurate they are the more they cost! What the heck kind of weird crypto-capitalism is that?I mean...I believe in globes...do I qualify?
I used to believe in them until I started to price the damn things. I mean, the more inaccurate they are the more they cost! What the heck kind of weird crypto-capitalism is that?I mean...I believe in globes...do I qualify?
You may be familiar with one of the more archaic terms for the group, The Illuminati.
What's with all the 'owned' stuff? Are they all 12 years old over there?
But if a tree falls in the forest, and there are no globalists to hear it....is that proof of a conspiracy?
But physics question- If a flag pole falls over, won't the brass ball fall faster than the usual terminal velocity? Sort of like cracking a whip where the end goes faster than the speed of sound... you are basicaly adding energy to the downward force of gravity theat affects the eagle on the tip. That added energy is caused by the pole trying to rotate around it's center of gravity, and the butts upward force would push the tip downward. I'd bet the tip would hit before the butt. To experiment, just let any tall item fall- the handle from a push broom, piece of pipe....
Too bad the conspiracists had the buildings fall downward, not over sideways.
Believe it or not they are having an allegedly serious discussion in which some people are opining that the second plane approached the south tower but did not hit it (yes, really!). See, "they" got to all the amateur video, "they" doctored the live TV images. The forum participants haven't yet got around to explaining how "they" exercised mind control over the million or so live witnesses or how a heavily damaged jet engine ended up on the corner of Church and Murray but give them time.I came into this a bit late here, sorry, but I'm a little confused. What part about the two planes I watched crash into the towers (from my vantage on Fulton Street) didn't really happen?
Unfortunately, "owned" has been around long enough to be used by 20-year-olds now.I was really hoping it would go away, but it hasn't. It just cheapens the experience in UT2004 when a character yells "Ownage!!!"
![]()

I PUBLICLY CHALLENGE ANYONE OF THESE PEOPLE TO COME ON MY SHOW OR SUBMIT THEIR OWN SHOW TO REVERE RADIO NETWORK DETAILING HOW THEY ARE CORRECT AND WE ARE INCORRECT.
[email protected]
Heh... even 'globalist' is an archaic term. Everyone in the know is fully aware of the real modern term for our movement. Which, of course, I'm forbidden from writing on such an open forum.
I liked it when we were still just the Free Masons. Oh well.
Anyway, check out the memo.
thats a challenge from roxdog
I strongly believe roxdog believes what he is preaching and it took a lot of balls to make this challenge
He is not hiding, or deflecting, and he asks a serious debate
The answer here is not to call him names, or belittle him ( as seems to be the MO at the LC). Either answer his challenge, or not, but he is giving a fair chance here I believe.
It's really the enormous font that gives him away......
Roxdog is not seeking debate, he is drooling over the possibility of an ambush.
Believe it or not they are having an allegedly serious discussion in which some people are opining that the second plane approached the south tower but did not hit it (yes, really!). See, "they" got to all the amateur video, "they" doctored the live TV images. The forum participants haven't yet got around to explaining how "they" exercised mind control over the million or so live witnesses or how a heavily damaged jet engine ended up on the corner of Church and Murray but give them time.
Unfortunately, "owned" has been around long enough to be used by 20-year-olds now.I was really hoping it would go away, but it hasn't. It just cheapens the experience in UT2004 when a character yells "Ownage!!!"
![]()
...or at least, so says some dude on the Loose Change forum:
http://s15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=1413
You realize that "radio" doesn't actually mean broadcast radio in this instance, right? That it's an internet streaming audio? What, functionally, is the difference between something on a public internet site such as this one and going on streaming audio (or submitting audio) to him, besides his ability to edit out what he wants prior to broadcast or bleep out someone during broadcast -- something the available evidence suggests they have no hesitation to do on the Loose Change site?thats a challenge from roxdog