This forum is full of cowards!!!

But if a tree falls in the forest, and there are no globalists to hear it....is that proof of a conspiracy?

But physics question- If a flag pole falls over, won't the brass ball fall faster than the usual terminal velocity? Sort of like cracking a whip where the end goes faster than the speed of sound... you are basicaly adding energy to the downward force of gravity theat affects the eagle on the tip. That added energy is caused by the pole trying to rotate around it's center of gravity, and the butts upward force would push the tip downward. I'd bet the tip would hit before the butt. To experiment, just let any tall item fall- the handle from a push broom, piece of pipe....

Too bad the conspiracists had the buildings fall downward, not over sideways.
 
I came into this a bit late here, sorry, but I'm a little confused. What part about the two planes I watched crash into the towers (from my vantage on Fulton Street) didn't really happen?

There seems to be some discussion over there about explosives inside the WTC. Had any of these people ever been inside the office spaces of the WTC?

I looked through some of the profiles of some of the posters on that site and several had Charlie Sheen quotes as their signature. If it wasn't so sad it would be funny.
 
What's with all the 'owned' stuff? Are they all 12 years old over there?

Unfortunately, "owned" has been around long enough to be used by 20-year-olds now. :( I was really hoping it would go away, but it hasn't. It just cheapens the experience in UT2004 when a character yells "Ownage!!!" :(
 
That was my first read of a forum like that...

I must say it was kind of a guilty pleasure!!!

?

like cartoons??
 
But if a tree falls in the forest, and there are no globalists to hear it....is that proof of a conspiracy?

But physics question- If a flag pole falls over, won't the brass ball fall faster than the usual terminal velocity? Sort of like cracking a whip where the end goes faster than the speed of sound... you are basicaly adding energy to the downward force of gravity theat affects the eagle on the tip. That added energy is caused by the pole trying to rotate around it's center of gravity, and the butts upward force would push the tip downward. I'd bet the tip would hit before the butt. To experiment, just let any tall item fall- the handle from a push broom, piece of pipe....

Too bad the conspiracists had the buildings fall downward, not over sideways.

The rotational speed is faster, but the amount of time it takes to get from height h to height zero is the same. It's just that it takes an indirect path (arc of a circle) to get there.
 
I came into this a bit late here, sorry, but I'm a little confused. What part about the two planes I watched crash into the towers (from my vantage on Fulton Street) didn't really happen?
Believe it or not they are having an allegedly serious discussion in which some people are opining that the second plane approached the south tower but did not hit it (yes, really!). See, "they" got to all the amateur video, "they" doctored the live TV images. The forum participants haven't yet got around to explaining how "they" exercised mind control over the million or so live witnesses or how a heavily damaged jet engine ended up on the corner of Church and Murray but give them time.
 
Unfortunately, "owned" has been around long enough to be used by 20-year-olds now. :( I was really hoping it would go away, but it hasn't. It just cheapens the experience in UT2004 when a character yells "Ownage!!!" :(

Actually, it's been around long enough it's used by thirty-somethings. Or so I've heard. :whistling
 
Why does that site bring a wisp of nostaglia for Carlos and his paranormal hat to my mind?
 
I PUBLICLY CHALLENGE ANYONE OF THESE PEOPLE TO COME ON MY SHOW OR SUBMIT THEIR OWN SHOW TO REVERE RADIO NETWORK DETAILING HOW THEY ARE CORRECT AND WE ARE INCORRECT.

[email protected]

thats a challenge from roxdog

I strongly believe roxdog believes what he is preaching and it took a lot of balls to make this challenge

He is not hiding, or deflecting, and he asks a serious debate

The answer here is not to call him names, or belittle him ( as seems to be the MO at the LC). Either answer his challenge, or not, but he is giving a fair chance here I believe.
 
Heh... even 'globalist' is an archaic term. Everyone in the know is fully aware of the real modern term for our movement. Which, of course, I'm forbidden from writing on such an open forum.

I liked it when we were still just the Free Masons. Oh well.

Anyway, check out the memo.
 
Heh... even 'globalist' is an archaic term. Everyone in the know is fully aware of the real modern term for our movement. Which, of course, I'm forbidden from writing on such an open forum.

I liked it when we were still just the Free Masons. Oh well.

Anyway, check out the memo.

Ah, the conspiracy that dare not speak its name...
 
I forget to send in my dues, and now I don't know the secret handshake and my magic decoder ring is out of date.

I think I'm going to have to get initiated again. Fire up the spanking machine!

LLH

 
thats a challenge from roxdog

I strongly believe roxdog believes what he is preaching and it took a lot of balls to make this challenge

He is not hiding, or deflecting, and he asks a serious debate

The answer here is not to call him names, or belittle him ( as seems to be the MO at the LC). Either answer his challenge, or not, but he is giving a fair chance here I believe.

This is not a call for serious debate. This is the Spider inviting the fly into her parlor. This is an invitation to 'debate' on an obviously hostile show, with an obviously hostile host, and quite probably an obviously hostile audience. There is little to gain, unless he has a serious number of fencesitters listening to him (doubtful).

If he were looking for honest debate, he would make arrangements with a host who is neutral. Otherwise he doing little more than a variation on the old Wally George tactic of screaming that anyone who criticizes him must come on his show and be ridiculed by audience and Wally.

Roxdog is not seeking debate, he is drooling over the possibility of an ambush.
 
Believe it or not they are having an allegedly serious discussion in which some people are opining that the second plane approached the south tower but did not hit it (yes, really!). See, "they" got to all the amateur video, "they" doctored the live TV images. The forum participants haven't yet got around to explaining how "they" exercised mind control over the million or so live witnesses or how a heavily damaged jet engine ended up on the corner of Church and Murray but give them time.

Thanks for clearing that up Manny. It seems that a lot of people from Tennessee have a much clearer idea of what happened than us. Must be all those mind control drugs in the water.

BTW - if it was me the evil gov't folks were gunning for that day, they hit about 15 minutes too early.
 
Unfortunately, "owned" has been around long enough to be used by 20-year-olds now. :( I was really hoping it would go away, but it hasn't. It just cheapens the experience in UT2004 when a character yells "Ownage!!!" :(

Except it isn't cool anymore unless you spell it pwned!!11one
 
thats a challenge from roxdog
You realize that "radio" doesn't actually mean broadcast radio in this instance, right? That it's an internet streaming audio? What, functionally, is the difference between something on a public internet site such as this one and going on streaming audio (or submitting audio) to him, besides his ability to edit out what he wants prior to broadcast or bleep out someone during broadcast -- something the available evidence suggests they have no hesitation to do on the Loose Change site?
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom