This forum is full of cowards!!!

I'm I reading their nonsense correctly? Do these weirdos actually think that WTC7 fell faster than free-fall? Then they have the nerve to criticize other people's physics?

I'd say I want what they are smoking, but I don't want to think like an idiot!

Yes, the Globalists used JATO units to speed up the collapse. Brilliant!
 
I was going to post something along the lines of how the conspiracy not only arranged for planes to fly into the buildings and wired them with explosives, but they also installed an elaborate cable system to pull the buildings down at an accelerated rate.

But the JATO comment was much more elegant - a great synthesis of urban legends, fuzzy thinking, and conspiracy theories. Good job!
 
I'm I reading their nonsense correctly? Do these weirdos actually think that WTC7 fell faster than free-fall? Then they have the nerve to criticize other people's physics?

I never understood this argument. Even if the buildings were destroyed by explosives, wouldn't the buildings still fall at the same rate?

LLH
 
Memo, what memo? Why wasn't I sent this secret memo? Why are you all conspiring against me?! Haven't I kept the secret of the black helicopters and what goes on at area 51?

Unbelievable!!! You try and get on within the secret world government and just because you're not a giant lizard you're discriminated against, I'm thinking of suing

It was part of the TPS report.
 
I never understood this argument. Even if the buildings were destroyed by explosives, wouldn't the buildings still fall at the same rate?

LLH

Depends :)

They wouldn't fall faster than free-fall, unless all of the explosives were on top of the building. If you assume a traditional demolition, then it will fall slower than freefall. Same for almost any demolition scenario I can think up. You'd have to intentionally wire it with the express purpose of a faster-than-freefall drop to get that effect (timed so the top goes off first, driving debris down, the next floor's charges go off at exactly the right time, etc, etc). Even then, the timing would have to be perfect, and you'd still have bits blown upwards, reducing the speed. It's a completely unrealistic scenario. IF they could do this, then it doesn't matter if twe figure out the conspiracy or not, because they are centuries ahead of us in scientific and technical ability.
 
They say they tried and got rejected. I suggested they email upchurch--one of them said he did, but I never heard what the reply was. I pm'd upchurch myself and posted his reply, which confirmed what I believed to be the only reasons for rejection--incomplete forms, incomplete names, and locations that don't match IP addresses.

Now they think upchurch and darat are in on 'it'.

Of course! You don't expect them to give up their REAL information, do you? The globalists are EVERYWHERE!

Even now, they are plotting to make these idiots look like lunatics, when in fact they are merely morons!
 
Yes, the Globalists used JATO units to speed up the collapse. Brilliant!

Until a small group of sharp-minded wackos saw through their nefarious scheme. Oh, why, they lament, didn't they just let the buildings fall on their own?

Curses! Foiled again!
 
I never understood this argument. Even if the buildings were destroyed by explosives, wouldn't the buildings still fall at the same rate?

LLH

Yes. You are exaclty right.

I am now considering this as proof that the CTers are actually managing to get dumber.
 
In addition to delphi_ote in a separate thread, now WildCat, LordoftheLeftHand, and kookbreaker have been singled out by the Loose Change forum's go-to man, Roxdog.
 
Here's their explanation for the buildings falling faster than free fall.

Some sort of explosives would do the trick nicely

:eek:

ROFLMAO!!! Oh, tears in my eyes, can't see... Oh, how priceless.
 
In addition to delphi_ote in a separate thread, now WildCat, LordoftheLeftHand, and kookbreaker have been singled out by the Loose Change forum's go-to man, Roxdog.

He obviously has little understanding of gravity. I wonder if he knows how foolish it is to say that something is falling faster than freefall. He has no concept of what is required for that.

He complains about my lack of explanation, I guess I am too used to people with at least a bare-bones concept of how the world works.
 
I'm I reading their nonsense correctly? Do these weirdos actually think that WTC7 fell faster than free-fall? Then they have the nerve to criticize other people's physics?

I'd say I want what they are smoking, but I don't want to think like an idiot!

I don't know what they're saying over at the website, but on the "Loose Change" thread here, it was my impression that Alek said WTC7 fell at free fall velocity, not faster. This, he said, was proof that explosives were set and that this was a "controlled demolition".

He never did respond, though, when people pointed out that you could see debris falling faster than the building, thus proving it was slower than free fall. I wonder why he didn't answer...
 
He's actually referencing the boards there. It was claimed that WTC 7 collapsed faster than free fall. Now they're claiming it was due to the vacuum created when the explosives fired. Apparently, the suction created by the partial vacuum is enough to override the force of the initial explosions and cause the structure to fall faster than free fall. Well, that's their claim at least.
 
Last edited:
He's actually referencing the boards there. It was claimed that WTC 7 collapsed faster than free fall. Now they're claiming it was due to the vacuum created when the explosives fired. Apparently, the suction created by the partial vacuum is enough to override the force of the initial explosions and cause the structure to fall faster than free fall. Well, that's their claim at least.

Do these people have a clue how anything works? They've basicly described something akin to a science fiction weapon, not conventional explosives!
 
He's actually referencing the boards there. It was claimed that WTC 7 collapsed faster than free fall. Now they're claiming it was due to the vacuum created when the explosives fired. Apparently, the suction created by the partial vacuum is enough to override the force of the initial explosions and cause the structure to fall faster than free fall. Well, that's their claim at least.

Is this an admission that their CT sucks?
 
Do these people have a clue how anything works? They've basicly described something akin to a science fiction weapon, not conventional explosives!


When you wear a pound of tinfoil on your head, does logic really enter the picture?
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom