Things You'll Never Hear a 9/11 CTist Say...

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you realize what an idiot you've been.
 
Yea, it is probably ridiclous to assume that first responders could tell the difference between molten steel and molten aluminum.
 
(Pentagon stuff:)

Oh? The 16ft hole in the Pentagon is the exit hole? Well, of course that changes things.

Oh? The Pentagon lawn IS littered with AC parts? Well, that certainly suggests an AC hit.

Oh? The just because a CCTV cam is in line of sight og the Pentagon, it needs not record the Pentagon? Well, I guess that makes sense.

Oh? The CCTV cam had a 2 pics per second framerate? Well, that does explain why there are might be no good frames of the AC.

Yes, when we extrapolate from the hole in the wall to the light-poles, it is consistent with a large aricraft approacing at a flat angle and low altitude. I guess we can't take the FDR altimeter readings at face value, then.

Yes, I can see that the final maneuvre is quite amateurish. I guess Hani was just lucky to hit the building so precisely. No wonder they wouldn't let him rent a Chessna.

Yes, I realize that officials did not have to cancel travels on 9/11 if they were in on it. They'd have known which planes to avoid. Or they wouldn't have booked them in the first place.

No, I agree that the fireball is not consistent with a HE missile warhead.

Yes, I know shaped charges don't make 16ft holes.

Yes, I see there is wreckage of a nose wheel just outside the hole in that photo.

etc......

Hans
 
Actually I suppose you're right, first responders, and eye witnesses to a mass catastrophe will have conflicting and confusing accounts of what occured, and may not fully understand whats going on.
 
Having actually contacted the eyewitnesses to see what the meant when they said "I heard explosions"...
 
" I think LC could be wrong on this one"

" I didn't realize that LC supported that, how offensive"

" Somebody from LC said what? That’s just disgraceful"
 
Can't argue with you guys right now, I have to get ready for my date.
 
I understand that a law supported by court decisions is, by definition, legal. If I don't like it and believe it is unconstitutional, I will have to convince my representatives to repeal it or the courts to rule against it. Writing internet blogs and producing videos declaring it illegal is completely ineffective. I still have to pay my taxes or face the consequences under the law.
 
I am not that banned CTer coming back here before I am supposed to.

I am not a glutton for punishment.
 
"Judging from the difficulty we're having in Iraq, maybe a bunch of pissed off Muslims really COULD pull off 9/11 without inside help...."

"Maybe I should stop lining my baseball cap with tinfoil..."

"im treyeing to imporve my spleling and tiping"
 
"There really isn't any connection between a lot of these dots."

"Why don't we travel to the Middle East and get some of these supposed hijackers who are still alive on videotape?"
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom