Thermitic Pyrotechnics in the WTC Made Simple

[WildCat]

At some point we should move beyond whether the towers were brought down by controlled demolition, and start trying to discover who carried out the operation of mining three buildings in the heart of Manhattan for demolition after a false-flag terror strike.

I thought you had it figured out years ago with the Jewish perps parachuting out of the wheel wells just before the planes impacted the towers?

 

[Thunder]

I am a Jew. I was not in NYC on 9-11. Know why?

Cause I got info about the attacks a week before it happened!!! Hahahaha!!!!!

 

[Toke]

I stopped considering pyrotechnics after realising that the planes and fires alone were plenty to bring down the towers.

That was a few days after waching loose change for the first time. The years before that I took it for granted.

 

[Grizzly Bear]

Edited by chillzero: 

Edited for quoted post, which was edited for rule 11, and response.

At some point we should move beyond whether the towers were brought down by controlled demolition, and start trying to discover who carried out the operation of mining three buildings in the heart of Manhattan for demolition after a false-flag terror strike.
<snip>
Galileo was right. You JREFers need to consider throwing in the towel and joining the side of truth. Do you really want to be the last rat on a sinking ship?

Like supporting theories which utterly violate every conceivable design principal learned in college and applied by every competent professional architect and structural engineer?


The idea sounds like a fun adventure but I've spent my 4 years in college to enter this field... I'd like to enter the master's program this fall without spouting woo and putting that education to waste....

I stopped considering pyrotechnics after realising that the planes and fires alone were plenty to bring down the towers.

That was a few days after waching loose change for the first time. The years before that I took it for granted.

Haven't watched loose change myself... but I know the thrust of what it talks about from the other CT's here... I did see AE911truth's articles... and they utterly *intercoursed* every competent process I'd have expected to come from people of their profession... I agree that fire tends to do a dandy job in the stead of massively complicated nano thermitic baconators.

 

[Hokulele]

At some point we should move beyond whether the towers were brought down by controlled demolition...

Why? Because there is no evidence they were?

 

[Thunder]

Id like to see the truthers start naming suspects. This should be good. I am a Jew...am I one of them?

 

[FineWine]

The sign of a great scientific paper, is one that explains many other phenomenon which is seemingly unrelated to the paper at first glance.

That is what Harrit's paper does, it explains everything.

I know you JREFers sit in dread, because you are wrong.

You deny scientific facts uncovered by internationally known scientists. You do this because you know the game is up.

Edited by chillzero: 

Edited for rule 11.

Your breakdown is funny. So, your great "discovery" turned out to be red paint. If Jones acted in good faith, independent analysis could settle the issue in a few days. How long are you prepared to wait, and wait, before you realize that your heroes have no intention of coming clean? They are not submitting anything to an independent lab. They never have, and they never will.

 

[defaultdotxbe]

The other JREFer just said it was. He said that when paint burns it gets as hot as thermite.

Make up your minds!

who said that? assuming anyone did they are wrong

1500C is much cooler than thermite, which reaches temperature of 2500C

 

[Arus808]

Linked by Braccho in another thread, Henry62 (a member here) offers his insight on the report by Jones:

http://undicisettembre.blogspot.com/2009/04/active-thermitic-material-claimed-in.html

 

[332nd]

At some point we should move beyond whether the towers were brought down by controlled demolition, and start trying to discover who carried out the operation of mining three buildings in the heart of Manhattan for demolition after a false-flag terror strike.

Agreed! That point should be right after truthers prove the towers were brought down by CD... So you might wanna do that.

So now we know that elite officers in Israeli intelligence were trained in demolitions. We also know, thanks to Christopher Bollyn's research, that WTC owner Larry Silverstein had close personal relationships with such Israeli leaders as Ariel Sharon and Bibi Netanyahu. We know that the passenger sitting in seat 9B on AAL11 was an officer in the Sayeret Matkal, the elite Israeli commando unit of which the above mentioned Netanyahu was also a member.... and we know that the American Airlines employee who fielded the phone call from a desperate Betty Ong aboard the hijacked plane told two major newspapers that she told him the hijackers came from seats 9A and 9B-- 9A being occupied by yet another man with a Zionist background, who graduated from the King David School in Johannesburg.

Do we know that or do you believe that?

Whew, and that's just the beginning; we haven't even gotten to Michael Chertoff yet....

... Yeah....

Galileo was right. You JREFers need to consider throwing in the towel and joining the side of truth. Do you really want to be the last rat on a sinking ship?

What happens if we don't?

 

[Dave Rogers]

At some point we should move beyond whether the towers were brought down by controlled demolition,

Us sane people already did that years ago.

Do you really want to be the last rat on a sinking ship?

I don't know, I've never tried it. How's it working for you?

Dave

 

[zooterkin]

So now we know that elite officers in Israeli intelligence were trained in demolitions.

And that makes them different from intelligence officers from other countries how? Do you also think they are the only people in the world who have this knowledge?


Of course, you still have to produce a shred of evidence that the WTC was demolished in the first place.

 

[chillzero]

Several posts edited or moved for topic and civility. Please remember the MA, and keep your responses on topic, and civil.

Attack the argument, not the arguer.

Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: chillzero

 

[Galileo]

Can you tell us all how much thermite you would need in order for it to burn for 3 and a half months?

Why don't you tell us why fires burned underground until December 19, 2001.

 

[Galileo]

You've been here for nearly 2 years and are still claiming there was molten steel?

the reports of molten steel are explained by the thermite found in the WTC rubble.

 

[defaultdotxbe]

Why don't you tell us why fires burned underground until December 19, 2001.

because no one put them out

 

[twinstead]

the reports of molten steel are explained by the thermite found in the WTC rubble.

1. You have not shown thremite was found in the rubble, no matter what you THINK you have shown.

2. How is molten steel months later explained by thermite?

 

[Galileo]

1. You have not shown thremite was found in the rubble, no matter what you THINK you have shown.

2. How is molten steel months later explained by thermite?

The scientists found the thermite. It says right in their report. You have not examined the evidence, a team of international scientists did. You can produce no peer reviewed scientific paper that supports your claims because your claims are groundless.

 

[Galileo]

because no one put them out

They dumped enough water on ground zero to create a small lake. I guess thermite fires are not easy to put out.

 

[The Big Dog]

Why don't you tell us why fires burned underground until December 19, 2001.

Great question! My fourth grader was just asking the same thing. I showed him this:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mine_fire

Anyhow, Gal, you keep claiming those folks are "scientists." That is not my understanding. Why don't you share the background on all of the folks signing their pay to publish paper.