...
Given that no credible scientific body has debunked this controversial but peer-reviewed paper it seems obvious that it is an honest scientific study and that Jones is an honest man.
The only way to fight this is for NIST to empower Princeton or another university to perform an 'independent' study of their own using smples of dust from NIST itself and control samples from Jones and his team.
Only to a person suffering massive delusions can't debunk Jones. Jones work debunks itself for the critical thinker. Those who can't debunk Jones lack knowlege or prefer to spread moronic lies about 911.
Critical thinking skills = You can debunk Jones
The bench mark time for understanding 911 is minutes by the Passengers of Flight 93. They did in minutes what those who spread lies about 911 take years to master.
There is no need to fight Jones' fantasy conclusions on controlled demolition. Those that believe Jones are not critical thinkers, and those who are critical thinkers see Jones' fraud from the first paragraph he wrote on the subject. How many more years will it take you to do what some people do in minutes?
Universities are intersested in real research not exposing lies from a fraud when it is clear he is making up his conclsuions. The fact is it is proved the WTC collapse due to impacts, fires, and gravity. Proved by multiple studies for those who can researach past google 911.
The universites already proved the WTC fell in a gravity collapse; Did you fail to research properly? Universities proved Jones wrong you must exercise your critical thinking skills instead of your posting lies skills perfected by being gullible or just being a perfect SPAM troll. Once the Universities proved the gravity collapse is correct it makes Jones a liar; this happened years ago.
Reading this paragraph from Jones' first paper proved he is a fraud on thermite. Reading comprehension, some research, and a grade school education is all you need.
The observations of molten metal (I did not say molten steel!) in the basements of all three buildings, WTC 1, 2 and 7 is consistent with the use of the extremely high-temperature thermite reaction: iron oxide + aluminum powder --> Al2O3 + molten iron. Falling buildings are not observed to generate melting of large quantities of molten metal -- this requires a concentrated heat source such as explosives. Even the government reports admit that the fires were insufficient to melt steel beams (they argue for heating and warping then failure of these beams) -- but these reports do not mention the observed molten metal in the basements of WTC1, 2 and 7. Again we have a glaring omission of critical data in the FEMA, NIST and 9-11 Commission reports.
The Universities don't have to debunk Jones' paper, they have already proved his overall conclusion is moronic.
Those who lack knowledge, those who have no capability of doing valid research, those who prefer fantasy and lies about 911 will be unable to debunk Jones on their own until they gain knowledge, valid research skills, and drop the moronic fantasies.
When will you do valid research to see Jones was debunked on 911? Never? Next week? Next year?
99.999 percent of all engineers can see Jones is a liar by looking at his work; The work Jones does is self-debunking.
The Structural Engineer who built the WTC, the top expert on the WTC structure said.
Robertson said, “the collapse mechanism of the trade center, is as we anticipated it would be, when we first designed it” StevenJones_LeslieRobertson_20061026.mp3
When he heard Jones' delusion on thermite he called them, "
Preposterous" and "irresponsible". So the top expert thinks Jones' ideas are nonsense and that the gravity collapse of the WTC was a gravity collapse. Jones is a fraud who makes up conspiracy theories with no evidence and Robertson is the person who structurally designed the WTC. Who would you believe? BTW, if you can't figure out Jones is a fraud the work the Universities have done to debunk Jones already or in the future will not be understood by you and your delusion club.
How long will people remain in ignorance repeating Jones' lies? There are complete studies already with proof of a gravity collapse! The problem here is not debunking Jones by Universities, it is you don't understand their work in the first place. Having a delusion or an illusion is hard to break even when given the truth. Maturity may step in and fix your dependence on believing dirt dumb delusions.
So instead of understanding 911 and doing your own thinking you will post a pithy lie and go on to SPAM with more lies. Is physics too hard for you? 
