It specifically applies to you. YOU have no way of knowing if your assertion is accurate. The person you're responding to has an article in which the victims were set upon doing just the thing you assert has got to be extremely rare. In said article, she cites a common problem in that if two women are together and tell a lounge lizard to get lost because they're gay, the lounge lizards of the world have been known to respond with "Oh, yeah? Prove it. Kiss her!"
Milo worked for Breitbart. He was some kind of senior editor. It's the alt-right mouthpiece. Just because he's an attention whore, that does not exclude him from being one of the leading lights of the Alt-Right. The fact that he's gay makes him a bit of an anomaly; the fact that he's a self-hating gay wins him street cred with the troglodytes. The alt-right loves their anomalous attention seekers. Milo and Candace for the win.
What is it that makes you think that an attention-seeking clown can't be a paragon of Alt-Right qualities (well, other than that whole homo thing)? You seem to think everyone who's extreme is a clown to be dismissed. Weren't you preaching this to us about Nazis (sorry, "nazis") just last week? How do you feel about the Klan, just to pick another group you have zero familiarity with? Betcha think they're clowns, too.
