Can I qualify for the million dollar award with this?
In any way, allow me to expand a little on a post I'd made at the start of january.
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=2220704&postcount=2080
Apparently, it made Lyte go away for quite a few weeks, perhaps this one will, as well.
Lyte's "untainted" witness list:
J. El Kournayti - Elite Research Team will try to pin him down on the same semantics they already tried with J. O'Keefe. He will say the plane flew directly above him and they will take that statement literally. He did not see the plane crash into Pentagon. Being more than a mile away, he did not see the plane fly over the Pentagon.
C. Reyes - her statement will not make a difference between the "official" or Elite plane's trajectory. "Both" planes would fly to her north, but I'm sure Elite Researchers will milk her statement as far as it will go. She did not see the plane hit the Pentagon. Being about a mile away, she did not see the plane fly over the Pentagon. Some of her relatives, friends or neighbours might also appear in the video.
D. Symmes - his statement will not make a difference as to the plane's trajectory. "Both" planes would fly to his south. As he was located on Columbia Pike on 9/11, just west of Sheraton Hotel, they will probably use his statement to negate some other witnesses who claimed the plane flew in right over Columbia Pike.
E. Paik
S. Paik - brothers will say the plane swerved to the north from the Columbia Pike and that it flew over the Navy Annex. Elite Research Team will focus on the flyover bit, trying to emphasise that it flew *completely* above the annex. The Paik brothers did not see the plane hit the Pentagon. Located between the Navy Annex and the Sheraton, they did not see the plane fly over the Pentagon either.
Main Citgo witness - he did not see the plane crash into the Pentagon. He did
not see the plane fly over the CITGO. He did
not see the plane fly over the Pentagon. He'd only seen it for a moment, as it flew over the Washington Bulevard, pulling up over the road. Elite Research Team will focus on the "pulling up" statement, ignoring the part where the witness speaks about not seeing the crash, because of the highway ridge being in the way. They will overlook the witness' statement how he only extrapolated plane's path to the north of CITGO from the short moment he'd seen it pull up over the Washington Blvrd.
The Team will not provide details of their interview procedures or how their contact with the witness might've had affected his statements. The witness was interviewed in person on at least two occasions, a few telephone calls were made and he drew pictures. Elite Researchers will not present the details how his story might've changed under the influence of the interviewers.
Citgo witness' boss - she did not see the plane at all and only knows about it, because her employee told her about it. She might not be the Citgo witness #2. My source was scarce on this.
Previously known witnesses:
William Lagasse (Citgo witness #3) - Elite Researchers will sink their teeth in Lagasse's statement about being on the starboard side of the plane, as it flew above him. They might've even gotten him to draw pictures. If that is the case, the Elite Team seems to think they are in a win-win situation. If the sceptics/debunkers take his account, along with a neat drawing, as undeniable truth, than the official government story falls. In the boxed-in world of Lyte/Merc, where everyone has infalliable memory, they seem to think that if the sceptics/debunkers fail to fully acknowledge his story and drawing, then a Pentagon employee (Pentagon police Defence Protective Service officer) and a strong supporter of official story, will be proved a liar.
Chadwick Brooks (Citgo witness #4) - I'm not sure how he fits in all this, except if they made him draw a picture, in which case the same imagined win-win situation occurs, as Mr. Brooks is also Pentagon police force officer. Elite Research Team is convinced, sceptics will be forced to acknowledge his story or call him a liar.
Stephen McGraw - former marine, turned Opus Dei priest, yaddayaddayadda...
Mike Walter - USA Today journalist shill, yaddayaddayadda... but burgers were good though.
Lloyd England - see-saw light pole, shill, liar, yaddayaddayadda...
The list is apparently not complete and might not be entirely accurate (I'm not too sure about Mr. Walter and Mr. England appearing in the film), but it does come from Lyte's significant other - Merc himself.
Lyte, how will you reconcile your flight path with an unperturbed plume from the Pentagon crash? Do you realize that wake turbulence behind medium and large aircrafts can linger for minutes?
Will you provide detailed timelines for your interviews? You had interviewed at least some of the witnesses on different occasions. I would love to go over your interview procedures.
Does any of your witnesses stand to gain profit from your DVD sales?
How will you address the lack of evidence, physical evidence, if you like, for your flyover plane? How will you address the lack of flyover witness accounts?
You claim the explosion was intentionally designed to attract attention away from the plane and to fool the observers who were in a position to see the impact. For the sake of argument, let's say I agree. The explosion does attract attention. Thus it also attracts attention of witnesses from other sides of the Pentagon/Arlington/D.C.. But as those people would turn towards the explosion, they would be in the "perfect vantage point" to see the plane fly over. Where are they?
Was the explosion also timed to the precise moment when the plane turned on its cloaking device or did the plane accelerate so fast that it left the scene (whole Arlington, D.C., south Maryland area) in less than a few tenths of a second? What happened to flyover plane's engine sound?
When your film gets torn to shreds, will you still post the 4-hour researcher version?
Will there be a Pentacon: Second Edition version?
