ThePentaCON releases trailer

[Bobert]

How predictably tiresome.

Poppers law of falsifiability!


The testimony will cause the jury to rule decisively.

What testimony?
Who will be on trial?
YOU are MAKING THESE STATEMENTS so surely you have evidence to back this up, right?
Why do you do this and then not simply talk about it?
For christs sake the video is only few days away so be a man and back up what you are saying.
No one here will buy your video anyway so all these sales pitches are meaningless.
Do you see how cruel this is to both the victims and families of 9-11?

 

[Alt+F4]

Lyte's movie is A GOOD THING.

He seems to think only people on this forum view his ideas as stupid but the average non-skeptic person will believe every bit of this.

Now we know the average non-skeptic person who sees his movie has enough common sense to know it's a pile of garbage. These same average non-skeptic people will better get to know the crazy people who make up the "truth" movement and be less likely to believe any of the woo.

So thank you Lyte for putting another nail in your movement's coffin.

 

[Bobert]

Exactly! They'd be like "HOLY $#~+ did you see that plane bomb the pentagon?~!!! WTF !!!"

when i witnessed an accident where a car took out a light pole (which so happens to be the same accident I told in a previous thread about his mockery of a movie), the first thing i said was "HOLY %$!@ did you see what the #$#$# car DID~~~ WTF? I knew that GUY WAS @#@% drunk!"

That is a great point. If this happened the way Lyte had claimed certainly the appearance would have been that a plance bombed the pentagon and this CERTAINLY would have caused NUMEROUS (100's) of people to claim that a plane flew over.
ALTHOUGH Lyte could counter with the fact that all of these people were "paid off" or "planted"

 

[Bobert]

Steve Riskis?

What about him?

He was either fooled like virtually everyone else or he is a liar.

I believe he was fooled.

WOW!!
Scarey that a person is so distorted as to believe this and type this.

 

[Bobert]

Not only could......they most certainly WERE fooled.

They believe the plane hit the building.

I can SAY my neighbor is a child molester all day long and twice on Sunday but someone may actually ask me for P R O O F.

So Lyte where is your P R O O F that they were "fooled"

 

[Bobert]

Originally Posted by Pardalis
Hold on, let's be clear: your eyewitnesses say that?
Yes.

Just as emphatically as they say the plane was on the north of the station.

Believe me....there is no way you will be able demonize these witnesses.

They have zero motive to lie because they do not believe in a conspiracy.

So your witnesses claim the plane hit the pentagon but your video will prove a flyover?

Am I the only one confused?

 

[Bobert]

Well it's impossible to believe their independently corroborated placement of the plane while simultaneously believing their assertion that it hit the building.

You must choose one or the other.

Since most of them admit that the physical impact was concealed by the "fireball" and since they all place the plane on the same trajectory I am going with their placement of the plane.

All true critical thinkers will most certainly make the same choice.

I am willing to bet that if I saw a plane hit a building then 5 years later I would remeber that VERY VIVIDLY.

I somehow doubt that after 5 years I would be able to recall with EXACT DETAIL the flight path.

So your witnesses claim the plane hit the building but you dismiss this due to the fact that their recalled flight path does not match the science that was done?

Do you think that ANYONE would be able to remember a flight path with any accuracy?

 

[Bobert]

Most certainly.

It is apparant to the most remedial of video editors that frames have been removed.

Many of the dubious circumstances surrounding that video will be discussed in the "Researcher's Edition" of our film.

Ok Great!!
So you have EXPERTS to testify to that the Pentagon camera images were faked?

 

[Bobert]

Yeah right.

Cite one.

And cite where they admit to having analyzed it and DENY that frames were removed.

It's a fact.

Frames were removed.

IF ITS A FACT THEN FOR CHRISTS SAKE STATE F'n P R O O F THAT FRAMES WERE REMOVED!!
YOU ARE LIKE A LITTLE CHILD CLAIMING THAT WE SHOULD CITE A WITNESS BUT THEN YOU CITE NONE TO PROVE YOUR CLAIMS...PATHETIC!

 

[T.A.M.]

I don't care what their testimony states, because:

1. There is an overwhelming amount of physical evidence to prove events happened as the official account describes.

2. The testimony is a RECOLLECTION of the events, that lasted for perhaps 5-6 seconds, over FIVE YEARS AGO.

3. There are many more witnesses that say the plane hit the building, which Lyte and gang contend did not happen.

4. If you had serious evidence that could jeopardize the evil cabal, and should such a cabal exist, and you began to tell everyone on public forums about it...do you really think you'd be alive now Lyte...honestly. I mean we even have members here who know who you are, where you work...it would be very simple...

Come on.

For all JREFers, hear me now...

I PREDICT, on this day, February 17th 2007, that this "PENTACON" video etc...will not cause any stir, it will get little to no significant press. It will cause no indictments or legal issues, and will fade away into the night like all the rest of the stupid truther videos.

Please return to this post when this occurs, and declare me a true psychic, so I can win the million dollars.

Thank you in advance.

TAM

 

[Bobert]

Originally Posted by Pardalis
Lyte, do you account the fact that memory can be distorted by time?
Of course!

But here are the reasons why this testimony is so strong.

Perhaps you missed them in the above post:

Quote:
1) The high level of corroboration from independent accounts.

(we will present 4 separate accounts all corroborating each other while not being contradicted by a single other witness in the entire investigative body of evidence.)

2) The simple right or left nature of their claim.

(They only have to recall what side of the building the plane flew)

3) The perfect vantage point.

(No other witnesses were in a better position to tell on what side of the station the plane flew then the witnesses that were on the station’s property)

4) The high level of credibility of the witnesses themselves.

(The reason for this will be apparent when the identities of the witnesses are revealed.)

5) The fact that their testimony was filmed on location.

(This leaves zero room for misinterpretation of their claims as they are able to re-enact their experience for the camera)

6) The extreme magnitude of the event being something that is virtually impossible to forget.

Number 6 is an important one. Ask yourself where you were on 9/11. Virtually everyone remembers in detail where they were, what they did, and how they felt on that day. Now imagine you were on the CITGO station property just a few feet away from the plane with a perfect view of the Pentagon. Does it seem feasible that you could be completely mistaken as to what side of the station the plane flew? Regardless of how you answer that question none of the witnesses we spoke with believe there is a remote possibility they could be mistaken in this regard.

STOP PLAYING CHILDISH GAMES AND ANSWER THE PHUUCKIN QUESTION!

 

[Bobert]

Oops sorry my above attempt at a quote failed....

Pardalis asked
"Lyte, do you account the fact that memory can be distorted by time?"

And then Lytes "answer" begins with
"of course"

Sorry about that I am still learing how to quote

 

[Bobert]

Because truth is not math.

Physical evidence is only > eyewitness testimony when the physical evidence wasn't staged or provided by the perpetrator.

Well that about sums up Lyte and the truth movement.
If it contradicts their distorted view then it must be faked or planted.

 

[Bobert]

Now that is what we skeptics like to call a........

LEAP OF LOGIC!









Really brah......wait for the testimony.

Your communication methods are seriously textbook and predictably BORING!

*yawn*

Duuuuuuuude like wait for our way coooool evidence brah huhuhu duuuuuuude paaaaaass the booooooong!!
Like we will have all these cool dudes drawing these really cool pictures with this really cool orange crayon cause like the NWO likes to draw in orange...coooooool!!!
Afer our video goes to like 129,235 on Google that is when the NWO will be toppled...but like hey Dylan didnt you say that after the democrats got into power the NWO would be overthrown...I think that Dylan lied to us...
THAT IS NOT FAIR DYLAN!!

 

[ihaunter]

What's a guy gotta do to get some CT love around here? Apparently trying to make things easier for them isn't enough. I consolidated three of the biggest and most repeated arguments against him into one post. If Lyte could just give a clear rebuttal to those three, I could try to consolidate all the other major and oft repeated arguments. I'm here to make your life easier, Lyte. Why won't you let me help you?

Oh, and:
PHYSICAL EVIDENCE BEATS EYEWITNESS TESTIMONY!

 

[Bobert]

So Lyte- you claim there is no contradiction, but then there is- and then there isn't...

Is this because you're afraid of what your witnesses will say when you release your video? Will they be highly vocal in rejecting your characterizations of their statements?

Furthermore, your claim that:



Is perhaps more telling than you're willing to admit. Using that same logic- I'd be interested in hearing your formula for when there is no physical evidence to support the testimony.

And- using your logic, we shouldn't believe you, because it's likely that your evidence was planted- and we should go with "our" eyewitnesses...

Toto hit the nail right on the head!!
His witnesses will be easy to find and as long as they are not nutty truthers then when they see that their "testimony" has been twisted and manipulated they may not be all that happy.
It seems Lyte and his crew may have pulled a bait and switch on his witnesses.

 

[Pardalis]

Not only are Lyte's witnesses not proving his theory, but some parts of their testimonies are, if you stretch logic enough and discount the rest of their testimony.

That's even more lame than I expected.

 

[Bobert]

They were fooled by a perfectly timed sleight of had illusion and because their brains were ready to accept the fact that a plane would hit the building as a result of what just happened in new york.


I was able to figure this out because I was the only one with enough dogged diligence to buy a plane ticket, CALL the witnesses, obtain approval from the Pentagon and Navy to film, knock on doors, ask the questions, film the answers, and come home with footage to present to the world.

WOW!
It is amazing the depths that people will sink to justify their beliefs.

 

[Alt+F4]

I PREDICT, on this day, February 17th 2007, that this "PENTACON" video etc...will not cause any stir, it will get little to no significant press. It will cause no indictments or legal issues, and will fade away into the night like all the rest of the stupid truther videos.

And I predict that when the above happens, Lyte will say the government won't allow indictments or legal issues to arise due to his film.

 

[Cl1mh4224rd]

It absolutely blows me away that "Trippy" here thinks four people constitutes a "high level of corroboration". Especially when there are significantly more who personally witnessed the plane hitting the Pentagon. And many, many more who say absolutely nothing about seeing a plane exit the explosion and fly away.

There's really not more to be said beyond the obvious fact that Lyte has a serious disconnection with reality.