ThePentaCON releases trailer

Pardalis said:
Lyte, do you feel you are on somekind of a mission to bring light to the world?
Click to expand...
Lyte - light...logical conclusion. Seems like he has a Keenau Reeves messianic complex from watching the Matrix trilogy too many times.
 
Lyte Trip said:
This was an operation of deception.

The physical evidence was staged.

The independently corroborated eyewitness testimony makes this clear.

You will see very soon.
Click to expand...

Staged evidence? So let me get this straight. In broad daylight, on a main road, they some how planted lightpoles, a smashed taxi, debris and multiple lying witness's. The amount of people it would of taken to plant all this evidence in a short space of time would be immense.

How did they get it all there (ignoring the plane debris at the Pentagon for the moment) with no-one seeing them. Nobody has ever come forward to say their was suspicous activity or the road was closed so they could plant the evidence.

And the biggest reason why I think your confusing your smoking gun for a smoking crack pipe is...why? Why would they, in the most intricately staged event in human history, plant all this evidence when it's not even in the freaking flight path your suggesting?!?! Why bother? So some internet sleuth can solve the mystery 5 years later? WHY?

Aurrrgggh! The stupidity, it burns!!!
 
cabpole1plant.jpg


This is how they believe the evidence was staged.

The Five poles are removed at night through a phony late night road construction detail the week(s) or months prior to 9/11.

Then EARLY on the morning of 9/11 laid out poles 2-5 in the grass. Everyone drives by not noticing 4 poles laid out, inconspicuously, in the grass.

Then shortly before the entrance of our mystery flyover plane...

Perps drive large truck with cab on trailer northbound throw crushed up glass out by the off ramp by pole 3, and go under bridge drive up on the south bound loop.

Right after the plane flies over explosion goes off...

Police(blue) get diverted from gas station, the truck/trailer perps stop on loop as if they are shocked. Taxi is unloaded off trailer(yellow) while all are staring at the Pentagon. Truck continues up on the on ramp drops pole 1(green) in the fast/middle southbound lane street on bridge and perhaps bulb/glass debris. Cab eases his way up on the highway with "damage". Our police officer was adamant when he said he was sure the cab was over near that overhead sign (the one the plane flew over), near the on ramp...not on the bridge.

As everyone is distracted, the cabbie pulls up to the final point, the faceless guys in the Saturn pull up and move the pole making the scratch in the asphalt, so they can park their car. And with the assistance of the faceless shirt and tie men in the fire dept Saturn he turns his cab sideways near the pole, giving the appearance that he is helping block traffic going soutbound. They, perhaps the shirt and tie guys in the Saturn stand around and maybe even drop the glass, bulb pieces perhaps even the little pieces of leaves.
Click to expand...

Here's a picture they claim shows the trailer that held the final poles to plant:

http://www.geoffmetcalf.com/pentagon/images/1.jpg
 
Last edited:
Pardalis said:
:eek: Woah!

OK, let's recap.

You say you have eyewitness testimony that prove that flight 77 didn't crash into the Pentagon, but these very same eyewitnesses say that they saw the plane hit the building?

So basically, you just pick and choose whatever is in their testimony that fits your theory, and leave out the rest and say "they were fooled".

Come on man, either they were fooled, or they weren't.

Now which is it?
Click to expand...
Il faut le voir pour le croire ...

This must be one of the stupidest thing ever!
Lyte Trip made my day, ..., week, ... year!

I can hardly wait now that his movie is released! And I'm dead serious.
 
boloboffin said:
[qimg]http://i56.photobucket.com/albums/g171/boloboffin2/911/cabpole1plant.jpg[/qimg]

This is how they believe the evidence was staged.



Here's a picture they claim shows the trailer that held the final poles to plant:

http://www.geoffmetcalf.com/pentagon/images/1.jpg
Click to expand...

Thanks Bolo, I haven't seen that before. I would of put multiple laughing dogs underneath Lyte Trips ridiculous theory if it wasn't for the fact he was pissing on the graves of the people who lost their lives in Washington that day.

Obviously his and Merc's child-like imagination can't be refuted.
 
Methinks they don't believe a word of it. It's all about selling DVDs. Their site already invites you to buy JDX's crap:

thepentacon.com. said:
Please visit the website for our brother organization; Pilots for 9/11 Truth and pick up their movie "Pandora's Black Box".
Click to expand...

Why the invite to buy JDX's video when their own video is is going to blow the whole conspiracy wide open? Answer: these hucksters don't pass up a selling opportunity.
 
Lyte,
I have some questions that I hope you will respond to.

I will even allow for the sake of argument that you have indeed got witness testimony that says they saw / heard the plane fly to the north, and that they were being honest when they said so.


Have you gone to the Citgo station with these witnesses?
If so:
- while you were all there did you ask them to point to 'north'?
- did you ask them to point to exactly where they perceived the plane to be?
If not:
- did you ask them to identify on a map of the area exactly where they perceived the plane to be?

I hope you will answer these for me, because I am genuinely interested.
 
Lyte Not Too Brite:
I'm going to sum this up for you in terms a fifth-grader could understand. I know that's still way too complex for you, but maybe you can find a friend whose mind isn't fried from drug use, and they could explain it to you.
You have a handful of people that saw A plane fly north of the Citgo station. However, it was not THE plane that hit the Pentagon. In order for it to be THE plane, hundreds of other witnesses, physical evidence, and common sense have to be discarded. The fact that you don't understand this is indicative of severe emotional and physical problems that you need to get help with.
Now, quit thinking that you're little make-believe video is going to change anyone's mind. It won't. For one thing, I am not going to waste my time watching it, because I already know the lies and distortions you have in it, so it would be pointless. Many others here will do the same.
Anyone else who does watch it will immediately realize you're bonkers, and wonder how in the world you could seriously do something so pointless as this.

If there was ever an anti-drug-use example in this world, you're it.
 
LT, The idea that the fire ball would conceal an airliner flyover is ludicrous.
At best the fire ball would only hide the aircraft for a split second as it passes through. Your CG simulation shows this.
( I hope your film shows the fly over from several different angles. I think you'll see how obvious this is)

After the plane passes the fire ball, the plane will become completely visible again. The plane would be observed by everybody since all thier attention will be focused in the same area from several different angles.
Nobody would have been able to miss seeing the airplane continue it's path passed the Pentagon.
And a C-130 looks nothing like a passenger airliner. Even the civilian witnesses could tell the difference
(do you include the C-130 in your simulation?)

Not to mention the altitude and trajectory the airplane would have to take to avoid hitting the building would look obvious to witness.
In other words, It would not have fooled anyone.

The fact that you think so only shows how ignorant and dilluded you are.

I'm sorry but even your short tralier shows your whole hypothesis to be completely rediculous.
 
Last edited:
sleahead said:
Methinks they don't believe a word of it. It's all about selling DVDs. Their site already invites you to buy JDX's crap:



Why the invite to buy JDX's video when their own video is is going to blow the whole conspiracy wide open? Answer: these hucksters don't pass up a selling opportunity.
Click to expand...

I think it's obvious that LT only cares about getting his 15 minuets.
His protestations about "truth and Justice" sound like bad dialogue in a chilren's cartoon.
 
Lyte Trip said:
DavidJames said:
Generally speaking, I believe anyone who believes they possess information proving someone guilty of murder and makes a movie instead of taking the evidence to the authorities is a fraud.
Click to expand...
Someone?

You're kidding right?

I have no information that implicates any single individual.

You know perfectly well this is an entirely different claim.
Click to expand...
I feel like I've heard this conversation before...

Oh, that's right! It was in this one play I saw:
David Wong said:
The 9/11 straddler: A Play

_____________________________________

"I'm so sorry to hear about your sister."

"Yes, it was a terrible accident."

"Accident? Is that what you think?"

"What?!?! You think she was MURDERED?!?"

"I didn't say that."

"Well... you implied it wasn't an accident..."

"Oh, I'm not one to make accusations. Let me just say that I think she had some 'assistance' in her death."

"WHAT?! WHO!!? I'LL KILL THE S.O.B!!! I CAN'T BELIEVE THIS! MY SISTER WAS MURDERED!"

"I didn't say that."

"THEN WHAT ARE YOU SAYING!?!? You just accused someone of MURDER! Who was it? Was it Tommy?"

"I didn't say that. Your attitude is very unbecoming. You should be a critical thinker in these situations. All I'm saying is that the accident report had some inconsistencies, and I think she had some 'assistance' in dying."

"THAT'S THE SAME AS SAYING SHE WAS MURDERED!!! DO YOU EVEN REALIZE WHAT YOU'RE SAYING!?? You're saying someone killed her, AND IS WALKING AROUND RIGHT NOW, FREE! TELL ME WHO! I'LL GO TO THE COPS!"

"I said no such thing."

______________________________


Kind of like a game to them, I guess. It would be funny, if it wasn't for all the murderous lies and horrific unfounded accusations.
Click to expand...
 
JimBenArm said:
Lyte Not Too Brite:
I'm going to sum this up for you in terms a fifth-grader could understand. I know that's still way too complex for you, but maybe you can find a friend whose mind isn't fried from drug use, and they could explain it to you.
You have a handful of people that saw A plane fly north of the Citgo station. However, it was not THE plane that hit the Pentagon. In order for it to be THE plane, hundreds of other witnesses, physical evidence, and common sense have to be discarded. The fact that you don't understand this is indicative of severe emotional and physical problems that you need to get help with.
Now, quit thinking that you're little make-believe video is going to change anyone's mind. It won't. For one thing, I am not going to waste my time watching it, because I already know the lies and distortions you have in it, so it would be pointless. Many others here will do the same.
Anyone else who does watch it will immediately realize you're bonkers, and wonder how in the world you could seriously do something so pointless as this.

If there was ever an anti-drug-use example in this world, you're it.
Click to expand...

For a minute there, I thought I was reading Dennis Rodman's book.
 
Lyte Trip said:
Physical evidence is only > eyewitness testimony when the physical evidence wasn't staged or provided by the perpetrator.
Click to expand...
"And we can prove the physical evidence was staged because it conflicts with the eyewitness testimony", right?

Therefore, what you really believe is: eyewitness testimony is always > physical evidence when you want the eyewitness testimony to be true.
 
Lyte Trip said:
Arus808 said:
Did the family say that they didn't see a plane fly over?

Are you suggesting that because they didn't say this that it means the c-130 didn't exist?

Do you follow me?

Just because they didn't say they didn't see a c-130 or any other plane/jet doesn't mean it didn't exist.

I know there is a skeptic saying for this flawed reasoning.

What is it called?



I'm sure one of you master critical thinkers have the perfectly defined name for this fallacy.
Click to expand...

WOW!
Are you saying that EVERYONE who according to you should have seen this incredible fly over simply forgot to mention it?
WOW!!!
How does ones mind become like this?
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom