ThePentaCON releases trailer

Lyte Trip said:
It was a joke.

But yeah.....you DO seem angered by that for some reason!
Click to expand...

So your intention is to anger people, here?

I can tell you that refusing to answer my question does not anger me in the least- it makes me quite satisfied. I'm fairly certain nothing you do can really anger me... things like calling me a poodle are just silly and speak quite loudly to your cognitive dissonance.
 
Lyte Trip said:
The testimony will speak for itself.

No jury would deny it.

I firmly believe that these witness will be subpoenaed.
Click to expand...

You didn't answer the question. You're taking eyewitness testimony over physical evidence. This is the opposite of what you should do. What do you not understand about this?
 
Totovader said:
Yet you have been unable to answer very simple questions about your investigation. You have already been discredited- and you have been caught being dishonest.

Out of 13 eyewitnesses, 4 put the plane north of Citgo- contradictory to the other witnesses, physical evidence, and scientific data?

Is this correct?

Again- the contradiction... where are you on answering that?
Click to expand...

The flight path we have testimony for goes back about 2 miles.

Most did not have a view of the pentagon due to the topography.

None of the witnesses that were in a position to tell contradict the north of the citgo claim.
 
Lyte Trip said:
The testimony will speak for itself.

No jury would deny it.

I firmly believe that these witness will be subpoenaed.
Click to expand...
Let's for a second assume that you are right and the witnesses will be subpoenaed to a grand jury. You will be subpoenaed to a court trail asking why you withheld this evidence in a criminal case from the time of the interviews until the time you release your video. How would you answer so that you aren't found guilty of withholding evidence?
 
Lyte Trip said:
None of the witnesses that were in a position to tell contradict the north of the citgo claim.
Click to expand...
A hideous lie. Why do you disparage the people who suffered that day, and who still suffer because of what they saw? Many people saw flight 77 hit the light poles and the Pentagon. That upsets you? Then get help for your problems.
 
Lyte Trip said:
The testimony will speak for itself.

No jury would deny it.

I firmly believe that these witness will be subpoenaed.
Click to expand...

And if they are not?

What is your course of action?

You see- I'm not sure if I speak for everyone here- but this claim is laughable... not just because you think 4 people trump mountains of physical evidence, scientific data, science itself, many other witnesses, and the other individuals involved- but because you might actually believe that some sort of uprising will occur.

Then again, it's just as likely that you know you're full of it- and the only thing you can do to guarantee sales is to try and present your movie as something that it is not. Will this movie be available for download- free of charge? I didn't bother to check on that. If not- will you provide us with a copy?
 
Gravy said:
Please see my last post. Get help. You are not well.
Click to expand...

And you will be forced to admit the plane was on the north side of the citgo or call multiple witnesses liars or insane very soon!

You're going to be seeking help as a result I am sure!
 
Pardalis said:
I suggest this thread be saved in the JREF memory banks for posterity, as the perfect example of the mind of a self-deluded true believer, so that psychologists around the world could study this for generations to come.
Click to expand...

Nice thing about JREF is that threads don't disappear just because the moderators don't like or agree with the content.

After all, could a place where such things happen exist and still be populated by people seeking the truth? :)
 
Lyte Trip said:
The flight path we have testimony for goes back about 2 miles.

Most did not have a view of the pentagon due to the topography.

None of the witnesses that were in a position to tell contradict the north of the citgo claim.
Click to expand...

This is not an answer to my question.

You have avoided just about every question I've presented to you. Will your video be of a similar didn't-ask-won't-explain type of fashion?
 
Lyte Trip said:
If you were presented a plan that said.......we're going to invade and occupy Iraq and spout off whatever lies we need to in order to make this happen while killing as many people and spending as much money as it takes would you say......

Great plan go for it.
Don’t be stupid.
Click to expand...

I will gladly debate with you my beliefs on the Iraq war in another thread if you wish. Whether I approve or disapprove of the decision to invade Iraq is irrelevant to this debate. Stop hiding behind this war to promote your theories.

So are you going to answer the question?

So if you were in power and somebody came up to you and Said.

`Listen I’ve a got a plan, it goes like this. We are going to fly a plane full of innocent people towards the Pentagon, at high speed, then fly it over it, hope nobody notices or nobody films it. We are going to do this in broad day light in full view of everybody. Before hand we are going knock over some lamp posts. Then we are going to plant body parts, plane parts and the black boxes with the wrong data on then inside the Pentagon.`

What you do Lyle? would you say

  • Great plan go for it.
  • Don’t be stupid.
Click to expand...
Please take your time, please answer truthfully.
 
Lyte Trip said:
And you will be forced to admit the plane was on the north side of the citgo or call multiple witnesses liars or insane very soon!

You're going to be seeking help as a result I am sure!
Click to expand...

4 = multiple, right?

And... what are you calling the hundreds that contradict these claims? Suckers?
 
Lyte Trip said:
The flight path we have testimony for goes back about 2 miles.

Most did not have a view of the pentagon due to the topography.

None of the witnesses that were in a position to tell contradict the north of the citgo claim.
Click to expand...
Hmm...30% of your witnesses are the ones you choose to believe over the remaining 70% and the other witnesses that saw the plane hit the pentagon. Not only that but you claim they saw the flight path for 15 seconds????? Real conclusive ignoranus...did that get through your bozone layer?
 
Gravy said:
A hideous lie. Why do you disparage the people who suffered that day, and who still suffer because of what they saw? Many people saw flight 77 hit the light poles and the Pentagon. That upsets you? Then get help for your problems.
Click to expand...

I know perfectly well that they were fooled into believing this just as the witnesses we will present were.

It's what gives them credibility.

There is no way you will be able to deny the north of the citgo claim without calling multiple people liars or insane.

Why would you demonize witnesses like that?
 
Totovader said:
4 = multiple, right?

And... what are you calling the hundreds that contradict these claims? Suckers?
Click to expand...

NOBODY directly contradicts them.

ALL citgo witnesses claim the same thing and nobody else directly contradicts them by definitively placing the plane on the south side of the station.
 
C'mon Lyte...answer this...

~enigma~ said:
Let's for a second assume that you are right and the witnesses will be subpoenaed to a grand jury. You will be subpoenaed to a court trail asking why you withheld this evidence in a criminal case from the time of the interviews until the time you release your video. How would you answer so that you aren't found guilty of withholding evidence?
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom