Okay...things happened, before people could write and RECORD literal 'history'... History, in my mind, is the pursuit of past truths. Evidence of which gets more scarce and harder to verify as authentic, everyday. In some old societies, people lives for hundreds of years, using only verbal messages past down for generations. This too is 'history'.
Our history, the 'story' of how we 'stepped out of nature' is lost to us, or I guess the best way to put it is "we've mis-interpreted religion, mythology, and our history..."
THERE HAVE ALWAYS BEEN LOTS OF US EVERYWHERE.
If
as you yourself have done, you cite as "history" the biblical story of the creation of mankind, then is it not abundantly, ridiculously, glaringly obvious even to the most imperviously, stubbornly, obliviously ignorant wretch that at that time there cannot, possibly, by any stretch of the imagination, even diving into the murkiest depths of the mythopoeic miasma of mystical muddle, have been "lots of us everywhere?" There were, by that very account,
none of us
anywhere. If there were any of us anywhere, then the account itself is utterly and completely false, and thus shown to contain not the tiniest jot or tittle of historical usefulness. If it's true, it cannot be history.
History, whether it happens orally or in writing, is intentional. Tall tales, scriptures, jokes, songs, myths, legends, art and decoration, etc., may be mined carefully for historical fact, but they are not themselves history, and it is a serious mistake to take them for "history with errors." They are, and always will be, something other than history, created for purposes that may or may not have been compatible with historical accuracy, and must be deconstructed or interpreted accordingly. To suggest that the biblical story of man being created in God's image has any historical usefulness is utterly, unfathomably ridiculous.