Skeptic:
"What`s exactly "tired" about it?
Here's a hint, "demon": israel, the "racist apartheid state" in your view, only decided to build such a fence after hundreds of its citizens were killed by suicide bombers.
If there were no suicide bombers, there would be no fence. The claim that its purpose is "apartheid" is a deliberate lie--a rich one, too, coming from the likes of Saudi Arabia and Jordan, who explicitly forbid the jews to enter or become citizens of their contries, by law.
You call this "apartheid" for a very simple reason: you want suicide bombers to continue to kill as many israelies as possible.
That`s ironic coming from a follower of the Mycroft school of can`t even say where the demand for a Greater Israel ends.
It is, however, rather easy to say where the demands of "greater Palestine" end: throwing the jews into the sea (see the palestinian charter, Arafat's speeches, religious sermons, children's school books, etc., etc., etc.)
Obviously, it's perfectly all right for the Palestinians to pursue a genocidal course aiming at a second holocaust, but it is "apartheid" for israel to defend itself.
It's "tired proganda", in other words, because--using the usual "big lie" technique--you consider genocidal murder of jews part of the "legitimate rights of the palestinian people", while jews defending themselves is "apartheid".
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Did you ever read such rubbish?
You claim that Israel and the West are under threat ie that their existence is threatend. You have said nothing which justifies this proposition. So why don't you? Take the easy one: Israel.
Explain to me, in detail, who threatens Israel's existence, how they threaten it, and how likely they are to destroy Israel. Give me a list of states which could destroy Israel. Give me your estimate for how long it is going to take Palestinian suicide bombers to utterly wipe out Israel. Unless you're willing to back up your arguments with solid fact and reasoning, don't bandy about words like genocide.
The idea that the Palestinians are pursuing a "genocidal policy" is a nonsense and a massive insult to victims of true genocide everywhere. Not only that, but you are wrong even on your own terms, since if the attacks by Palestinians against Israelis constitute genocide then the Israeli attacks -which kill many times more innocemt Palestinians than innocemt Israelis- must constitute an even greater "genocide".
In fact, as should be obvious, the terms genocide and ethnic cleansing are far more applicable to Israel's actions than those of the Palestinians. The Palestinians are using what limited means they have to try and expell an invading force from their land...land which is recognized as theirs by almost every Court on earth. Israel is using incomparably greater means to gradually remove a people from their land, based upon colonialist imperatives and further "justified" through reference to a racist religious ideology that claims they are "entitled" to the land because of their ethnic identity. This form of "divine right" philospophy and narrative of a "chosen" or "superior" people is little different from the Aryan philosophies that dressd up nazi expansionism and a variety of other nasty little racist facisms throughout history.
Further evidence of this manifest racism can be seen in the repeated questions raised by so-called "moderate" Israelis as to why the Palestinians don't simply ship out to Jordan and other Arab states because they are, after all, "the same". One wonders, on that logic, why all the Israelis don't ship off to Europe and the US since they are basically white and would be happier there.
Furthermore, by raising the preposterous charge that the Palestinians are trying to bring about a "second holocaust" you are leaving the realm of sanity altogether...not to mention spitting in the face of every jew who lived or died during the first.
