The Truth Movement: Finally, Lost in Space

tempesta29 said:
Conversations evolve.
Click to expand...

Yes, but it's clear what is going on here. It's a common truther tactic. When faced with an issue he can't handle, a truther tries to get the discussion bogged down in some unimportant side issue to postpone his inevitable defeat.

I've seen it many times.
 
aggle-rithm said:
Yes, but it's clear what is going on here. It's a common truther tactic. When faced with an issue he can't handle, a truther tries to get the discussion bogged down in some unimportant side issue to postpone his inevitable defeat.

I've seen it many times.
Click to expand...

How are revenues of truth movement advocates irrelevant to a discussion about the truth movement? What I gather from the posts I've seen of yours is that you care most about "winning" an internet discussion rather than making any shred of sense.
 
tempesta29 said:
How are revenues of truth movement advocates irrelevant to a discussion about the truth movement?
Click to expand...

This is not a general discussion about the truth movement. It is a challenge to truthers to show that their movement is still alive and kicking. All you have been able to do in response to this challenge is to recycle old arguments and dust off tired, old truther debate tactics.

What I gather from the posts I've seen of yours is that you care most about "winning" an internet discussion rather than making any shred of sense.
Click to expand...

And yet it is you, not I, who are using cheap rhetorical tricks to avoid facing the thread topic head-on.
 
Just in case someone wants the latest turn in this thread in condensed form:

tempesta29: Truth movement finances? I bet you can't give any numbers.

alienentity: *gives exact numbers*

tempesta29: Bleah, that's irrelevant.

alienentity: Dammit, I was sure there used to be a goalpost around here somewhere.

tempesta29: I didn't take it. Conversations evolve. And it isn't a lot of money anyhow.
 
timhau said:
alienentity: Dammit, I was sure there used to be a goalpost around here somewhere.
Click to expand...

514648354ed376285.png
 
aggle-rithm said:
Because it would be absolutely groundbreaking. NO truther has even come close to being able to state a plausible hypothesis for what happened on 9/11. It would definitely qualify as the "something new" that Mackey is requesting.

I think one of two things is true about your hypothesis:

1. It is so silly that you are embarrassed to reveal it, or
2. It doesn't exist, which makes you a liar.

Feel free to prove me wrong.

It's simple, it's easy. Just state your hypothesis.

But you won't, will you?

Of course not.

Next, you will respond with a weak excuse why you will not do this very simple thing.
Click to expand...

CE?
 
Childlike Empress said:
Do you think his barking was clever? He knew that I wouldn't do it because I told you before. Stop thinking you guys are so important that you can demand anything from anybody. I was quite clear in this thread.
Click to expand...

Why contribute at all if you are unable to respond to the opening post?

Why claim you have a "working theory" if you refuse to divulge it?
 
Childlike Empress said:
Do you think his barking was clever? He knew that I wouldn't do it because I told you before. Stop thinking you guys are so important that you can demand anything from anybody. I was quite clear in this thread.
Click to expand...

That you are only here to troll? No other reason you would ignore the OP.
 
Correct. It's dead because there are no new ideas.

The truthers posting in this thread have proved that.
Click to expand...
The old ideas haven't been debunked. You just have the attitude that they've been debunked.
 
FatFreddy88 said:
The old ideas haven't been debunked. You just have the attitude that they've been debunked.
Click to expand...

Only if you continue to bury your head in the sand to ignore facts, physics, evidence, and real life.

Ignorance is bliss, ain't it Freddy?
 
Last edited:
FatFreddy88 said:
Come over to this thread and we can discuss this evidence.
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=208678
Click to expand...
The "evidence" you're bringing is not what the OP asked for:
R.Mackey said:
It could be anything. It could be a new result or uncovering new evidence. It could be a well-formed hypothesis. It could be acknowledgement of some established but long-resisted fact, demonstrating that the Truth Movement still has some capability to learn or reason. It could even be "Just Asking a Question," provided the question is well-considered and sparks some thought to answer. Any one of these, I'll give it my personal thumbs-up and reset the timer.
Click to expand...
It's just the same old "no planer" (i.e. no Boeing 757 American Airlines Flight 77) stuff that's been passed around before. Heck, one of your links is even dated 2006, the other dealt with in multiple threads here, one from 2007, another from 2008. You're demonstrating exactly the kind of stasis Ryan was talking about.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom