The Trump Presidency (Act V - The One Where Everybody Dies)

[BobTheCoward]

You're free to ignore as much evidence as you want.

I ignored nothing.

 

[Steve]

A more nuanced comment by TWH than Trump implies.

Those two words do not belong in the same sentence.

I wonder what (who?) prompted Trump to tweet that? There is no way he actually remembered on his own that Obama made a statement about Chavez' election.

 

[Squeegee Beckenheim]

I ignored nothing.

Other than the evidence posted upthread. But that's up to you.

 

[Guybrush Threepwood]

Those two words do not belong in the same sentence.

I wonder what (who?) prompted Trump to tweet that? There is no way he actually remembered on his own that Obama made a statement about Chavez' election.

I think his brain was sharper then. (check the date of the tweet, its from 2012)

 

[Skeptic Ginger]

[qimg]https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4771/26063776297_dd72d3f942_z.jpg[/qimg]

Counsel. Whether.

This would be nitpicking, but for the continuous boasting as to how educated and smart Trump tells us he is.

Apparently one of the new lawyers Trumpy's hired is pushing the CT that Mueller has to find something simply because he's investigating.

 

[BobTheCoward]

Other than the evidence posted upthread. But that's up to you.

I factored it in. Depending on the crime and who we are saying committed it, it doesn't amount to probable cause.

 

[Skeptic Ginger]

What's Dershowitz been smoking? I mean, I know he's a wingnut, but "no probable cause"?

Come on, get with the program. Facts don't matter. If you have a workable slogan, go with it, say it enough times and reality just fades away.

 

[BobTheCoward]

Huh?

The actual standard for an FBI full investigation.

 

[Squeegee Beckenheim]

I factored it in.

And have decided to ignore it.

Depending on the crime and who we are saying committed it, it doesn't amount to probable cause.

If you ignore it.

 

[dudalb]

Some media are referring to him as a whistleblower. The narrative is he had no idea just what he was getting into when Cambridge Analytics and Steve Bannon got together to discuss business. Overall it appears this man is no fan of Trump--at one time he worked for the Liberals in Canada.

I think we are talking about 2 different people here, The guy I am referring to is the head of CA, who made a lecture basically bragging about what he did i E. Guy you are talking about is an employee who indeed seesm to have blown the whistle.

 

[dudalb]

[qimg]https://farm5.staticflickr.com/4771/26063776297_dd72d3f942_z.jpg[/qimg]

Counsel. Whether.

This would be nitpicking, but for the continuous boasting as to how educated and smart Trump tells us he is.

A lot of people are shaking their heads over Dershowitz's becoming a staunch Trump Defender.

 

[BobTheCoward]

And have decided to ignore it.



If you ignore it.

Or you are overweighting it.

 

[dudalb]

You're free to ignore as much evidence as you want.

Actually ,ignore is what I have been doing with Bob for a long time.

 

[Trebuchet]

A lot of people are shaking their heads over Dershowitz's becoming a staunch Trump Defender.

Both buddies of pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, of course. Along with Bill Clinton.

 

[Squeegee Beckenheim]

Or you are overweighting it.

Overweighting multiple independent, neutral sources saying a crime has been committed, and evidence of crimes having been committed when considering whether it's likely a crime has been committed?

 

[BobTheCoward]

Overweighting multiple independent, neutral sources saying a crime has been committed, and evidence of crimes having been committed when considering whether it's likely a crime has been committed?

As I said, depends on what crime and who you said did it. I don't dispute there is probable cause that those thirteen Russians violated federal law.

 

[phiwum]

Both buddies of pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, of course. Along with Bill Clinton.

Seems to be an ad hominem here.

 

[Squeegee Beckenheim]

As I said, depends on what crime and who you said did it.

The crime: conspiring with the Kremlin to win the election for Donald Trump. The accused: Trump's team.

 

[BobTheCoward]

The crime: conspiring with the Kremlin to win the election for Donald Trump. The accused: Trump's team.

Depends on what you mean by Trump's team and Kremlin.

 

[Segnosaur]

The crime: conspiring with the Kremlin to win the election for Donald Trump. The accused: Trump's team.

Depends on what you mean by Trump's team and Kremlin.

Seriously? You're wasting people's time trying to define "trump's team" and "kremlin"?

Pretty blatant diversionary tactic there.

Trump's team: those in an authority position during either Trump's campaign, or in the transition period, including (but not limited to): Trump himself, Trump Jr., Kushner, Manafort, Flynn, Gates, Papadopoulos, Stone.

The Kremlin: Those working for and associated with the current Russian leadership, currently under the command of Putin, including Putin himself.