• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

The Third Roberts-Fetzer Debate

I have no idea what a "filty" liar is.....
oh poo now i'm making pedantic language references.
I see i will fit in here.
A mispelling of filthy. Just answer the question Jason...you can even wear a hockey mask if you want :)
 
OK fact: mark roberts is not an expert in any field.
Fact: mark roberts is a tour guide

I don't get what you're harping on about. Neither Mark nor Mr. Fetzer have professional qualifications in any of the fields that were touched upon concerning 9/11, so why does it matter?

ETA: clarified grammar
 
Last edited:
A mispelling of filthy. Just answer the question Jason...you can even wear a hockey mask if you want :)

I don't know about filthy but if he has all the knowledge and can see all the actions of the mods at LCF and says that I was not IP banned then yes he is a liar.
look at that i answered a question and in doing so taught you a lesson.
MAN i'm on fire tonight.
 
I don't know about filthy but if he has all the knowledge and can see all the actions of the mods at LCF and says that I was not IP banned then yes he is a liar.
look at that i answered a question and in doing so taught you a lesson.
MAN i'm on fire tonight.
Well that's good enough for me...you did answer but you are lying and I think most people here see that.

ETA - oh, keep it polite :)
 
OK fact: Mark Roberts is not an expert in any field.
Fact: Mark Roberts is a tour guide

Ok i watched all three debates. For the life of me. I cant recall Mark disputing the fact that he is a tour guide. Or any statement mentioning he was an expert in any related field represented in the debate. Engineering, Science, Math. etc.
 
I don't know about filthy but if he has all the knowledge and can see all the actions of the mods at LCF and says that I was not IP banned then yes he is a liar.
look at that i answered a question and in doing so taught you a lesson.
MAN i'm on fire tonight.

Nobody believes your lame alibi. You are not "on fire", but we will certainly hold your feet to the fire as long as you keep denying it.
 
So could you tell me why when there was a caption on the screen refering to Mark roberts it didn't say "tour guide".
this is clearly dis-information

How does his profession have any bearing on debating facts behind 9/11? He isn't claiming to be the one who studied the collapse (if he was then we'd have a problem as he is not a structural engineer), he is pointing people in the direction of highly-qualified experts (NIST).

If his facts are wrong then please point them out.

In actuality your suggestion would only go against the truth movement as their head scholar, Prof. Fetzer, got shown up by a so called "layman."
 
Ok i watched all three debates. For the life of me. I cant recall Mark disputing the fact that he is a tour guide. Or any statement mentioning he was an expert in any related field represented in the debate. Engineering, Science, Math. etc.
What about the intro...debunker extrodinaire doesn't count :D
 
Ok i watched all three debates. For the life of me. I cant recall Mark disputing the fact that he is a tour guide. Or any statement mentioning he was an expert in any related field represented in the debate. Engineering, Science, Math. etc.

then the caption below his name should have said tour guide,
 
In actuality your suggestion would only go against the truth movement as their head scholar, Prof. Fetzer, got shown up by a so called "layman."

Fetzer should be ashamed of that fact. That debate showed that even highly educated people can have bias and cling to irrational beliefs.

And, gravy should give hope to potential truthers; he shows that laymen can indeed conduct relatively through investigations, separate the wheat from the chaff, and come to learned conclusions based on evidence instead of ideology.

If only the laymen in the truth movement could figure out how to do that.
 
Last edited:
then the caption below his name should have said tour guide,

No it shouldn't have. You have not supplied a convincing reason as to why his profession should be listed. Fetzer's profession is not listed in his caption either.
 
No but then I don't claim to have.
that is the difference. see that now?
Would you please link to the timestampped video where Mark claimed to have any 9/11 related professional qualifications or are you lying like you say IVXX did?
 
As truthers are fond of saying, why are we wasting time discussing qualifications instead of facts?

Slayhamlet, perhaps you could state a point that Mark is wrong about and we can discuss?




edited to bold slayhamlet's name, as is polite.
 
no fact just name calling, you are trying to be the bully but losing even against an insane guy like me.
I am referring to the fat stupid man as uncle Fester...deal with it and answer the question.

look at the facts you seem to keep harping on about and the fact is mark roberts is one step down from a bus driver... yet you suckers hang on his every word ... lol @ the dumbo's
Wow...do you read any of the other threads? Mark seemed ready to jump an attack me and I wasn't about to back down. Turned out I mistook his actions and he mistook my reading ability. How is that hanging on his every word? Can't you come up with something original or are you just going to sling old recycled woo crap our way?
 

Back
Top Bottom