I think it's pretty important, when talking to the heydarians of the world, whether fundie Muslim or Christian, to differentiate between science as a process and science as a mere product. Heydarian needs to frame it as strictly the latter- that way, he's free to interpret what his holy books said then to accord with what science has found since then, and (maybe more importantly for his viewpoint), he can frame the process (of science) as nothing but the product- it's all just stuff written down in books, and who's to say which book is better?
There's isn't, of course, any science in either sense, in any religion, especially as a process, since that would be a contradiction in terms. But you have to pin down folks like heydarian to the distinction to get them to understand the point that it's not what is written but how it got there that's meaningful.