Are we not living in strange times? He we are legitimately uncertain if a Senate candidate would lose the election even if he were proven to have had sex with multiple children.
Well...
Are we not living in strange times? He we are legitimately uncertain if a Senate candidate would lose the election even if he were proven to have had sex with multiple children.
Is the alive part important?
Are we not living in strange times? He we are legitimately uncertain if a Senate candidate would lose the election even if he were proven to have had sex with multiple children.
Are we not living in strange times? He we are legitimately uncertain if a Senate candidate would lose the election even if he were proven to have had sex with multiple children.
With luck that would split the republican vote and give the Democrats a chance to take the seat.Now stories..unconfirmed... that Luther Strange is in contact with GOP Senators leaders about running a write in campaign and one of the Senators is Lisa Mukowski who pulled it off in Alaska. If true this could be really bizarre.
These people are evil.
It's Alabama. He could have banged his sister and the voters there would be fine with it.
I see it like this: the hardcore base will vote for him still because they hate Liberals winning more than their guy being a degenerate. Another faction of Republicans will continue to say they endorse him leaving him with high poll numbers.
But on election day the latter may just stay home in the way that many Republicans did in Virginia and in that case if the Democrats can just turn out the vote they could win even though polls will predict otherwise.
HOWEVER my values are not his values, and they are not his voter base's values! Their values, especially when it comes to sexual mores, are uptight, ridiculously chastise, sex-hating X-tian suppression.
it is difficult to understand why all these Jesus-fearing X-tians with their "no sex before marriage" and "I shoot you if you touch my teenage daughter" attitude aren't righteously indignated?! Is it unfair to hold them to their own standards?
Moore was a predatory seeker of teenage sex. That's simply wrong in his own belief system. And he even denies!
Though shalt not bear false witness!
No not really, see we on the right aren’t used to our side having degenerates. So more evidence is going to have to come out. Now if this happens to your favorite leftist, it would be a resume enhancer.
No not really, see we on the right aren’t used to our side having degenerates.
Yep, those liberals like Governor Mark Sanford, Senator John Ensign, Representative Vito Fosarella, Newt Gingrich, Senator Larry Craig, and a few others...http://www.newnownext.com/19-republican-politicians-brought-down-by-big-gay-sex-scandals/12/2016/
Hmmmmmm.....
Meh, this isn’t Hollywood or the Clintons
I suspect his silent reference is to Bill Clinton's sexual escapades as POTUS and perhaps the accusations before he got that far. Because unproven accusations that were actually investigated, coupled with a blowjob from a consenting adult are evil while Roy Moore preying on minors isn't a big deal. Not to mention Hillary Clinton's refusal to leave Bill after the Lewinsky infidelity is proof of her sliminess and political aspirations as a power-hungry elitist while people continuing to support Roy Moore is simply recognition of Christian goodness.Sorry, please let me ask to be sure I understand you.
A thirty-two year old man molested a fourteen year old girl, granted some time ago. Let's suppose for the moment that the allegation is true. You don't think it matters? You don't think that this fact would make him a poor choice for the United States Senate?
At least he's not a Clinton? Is that your position?
Thanks for clarifying.
I suspect his silent reference is to Bill Clinton's sexual escapades as POTUS and perhaps the accusations before he got that far. Because unproven accusations that were actually investigated, coupled with a blowjob from a consenting adult are evil while Roy Moore preying on minors isn't a big deal. Not to mention Hillary Clinton's refusal to leave Bill after the Lewinsky infidelity is proof of her sliminess and political aspirations as a power-hungry elitist while people continuing to support Roy Moore is simply recognition of Christian goodness.