I'm wondering if the OP's absence is due to having been rumbled by Matthew Ellard, who clearly has done a good deal of poking around in the murky background of the law of one.
Any idea what made these crabs angry or were they always angry?
The reasons are many, but it boils down to 2 central problems which the rest center around.
1. Like any Conspiracy Loon, the UFO subject is not about UFOs, it's almost always about the PERSON WHO SAW A UFO. That or the person's pet theory (like underwater dino-lizard men). I sat through over two-dozen MUFON meetings in the 1990s where abductees and contactees told their amazing stories, but when question and answer time arrived they were vague on details other than their fantastic story, and if someone (me) pressed too hard they would be ignored.
If you notice, almost every famous UFO incident has an advocate who's written books on the subject, and does radio shows, and conventions.
Actual UFO incidents, and I mean Unidentified Flying Objects, don't have an advocate, and tend to live in the news papers for a week or two before folks move on with their lives.
2. Almost nobody at MUFON, at least at the meetings I attended, was interested in collecting hard data, and getting to the bottom of a specific incident. It was all about belief, and not about knowledge.
In fact, within the UFO community, I was part of a sub-group called "Nuts & Bolts" because people like me were hung up on getting evidence...you know, physical evidence like soil samples from a landing site or whatever else someone could bag and take to a lab. The "Nuts & Bolts" folks usually get run out of meetings because we suck the fun out of the room...
...leaving just the Nuts...
I came to the conclusion that if the USAF actually had recovered alien space craft they could park them on the runway at Nellis with big neon signs that read "Captured Alien Space Ships!" and MUFON would scream "Disinformation!"
Actually, FTL and the Event Horizon are the same thing. In fact, the World Trade Center didn't collapse, it just got sucked into a parallel dimension where Yahoo Serious is president of the UN.
A CTer getting his sanity back? I thought this was basically impossible...
Were there more things you believe in or just UFO's?
Have never heard that type of remark before .the UFO subject is not about UFOs, it's almost always about the PERSON WHO SAW A UFO. That or the person's pet theory (like underwater dino-lizard men).
Have never heard that type of remark before .
Travelling from zero ( BS ) to 10 ( proven) , I rate it a zero .
Just restricting the subject to those caught on NASA and ISS cameras , I can see no signs of any persons being involved .
Similarly for the thousands of examples raised my random members of the public .
But possibly untrue --- and therefore in your favour --- for a handful of others .
Puzzled .
KE , the author is American .
I could have written --- total and utter nonsense . But politely , i tried to let him down gently .
Obviously , I appreciate that Americans have difficulties with good English .
But that is their concern .
A CTer getting his sanity back? I thought this was basically impossible...
I'd stop bullying the primates if I were you. You know damned well that if word of this gets back to..."sentient reptiloids" is redundant. All great mutant fire-breathing lizard-thingies are sentient, and far more intelligent than mere humans. Get over it, monkeys.
You shouldn't make crabs angry... you wouldn't like them when they're angry!
The list if things I didn't believe in would be shorter.
I was down with just about any off-the-wall concept: Bigfoot, UFOs, the JFK Assassination, Nostradamus, Astrology, Tarot cards, Phsychics, etc.
Example: Bigfoot - Someone should have found one by now, dead, captured, or whatever. We have remote trail cams in the hands of millions of people in the US alone, but nobody's got a clear photo of one?
We can put cameras and scientific instruments almost anywhere on the ocean floor, and if science was better funded there would be a lot down there. I live near the Monterey Bay where MBARI is on the cutting edge of deep sea exploration, and every week they report some fantastic new discovery. The difference is that it's all real, they collect samples, they take high resolution video and photographs.

Nobody likes to admit they are wrong, or got played for a fool, but I was a fool. I assumed that the people writing those books and the people on Art Bell knew what they were talking about. When I looked into their research I found that they disregard mountains of data because it undermines their theory or world view. CTers hide behind the platitude that "They Control the Media", and claim that contradictory evidence is fraudulent.
Not that uncommon. A lot of the online skeptics I meet were conspiracy theorists at some point. I was myself. Used to love Abovetopsecret.
"Where's the evidence?" is always, always a legitimate question; and pointing out that you've provided nothing close to credible evidence - for a quite extraordinary claim, mind you - is always legitimate criticism.You completely discount my belief but do not give any legitimate criticism, no narrow mindedness there. None at all.
Have never heard that type of remark before .
Travelling from zero ( BS ) to 10 ( proven) , I rate it a zero .
Just restricting the subject to those caught on NASA and ISS cameras , I can see no signs of any persons being involved .
Similarly for the thousands of examples raised my random members of the public .
But possibly untrue --- and therefore in your favour --- for a handful of others .
Puzzled .
They're not aliens, theyre evolved sentient reptiloids.
a·li·en/ˈālēən/ said:adjective: alien
1) Belonging to a foreign country or nation.
- Unfamiliar and disturbing or distasteful.
- Relating to or denoting beings supposedly from other worlds; extraterrestrial.
Noun: Alien, Aliens
1) Foreigner, especially one who is not a naturalized citizen of the country where they are living.
- A hypothetical or fictional being from another world.
- A plant or animal species originally introduced from another country and later naturalized.
Sounds to me like you're advocating stating your predetermined conclusion, and then running away when people ask for evidence and raise legitimate objections.My view is that if requested it is best to present a case and then disappear . It saves time , energy and patience from having to deal with the large majority ( I believe ) who are not interested in real discussion , but delight in an opportunity to be dismissive , from flip remarks to outright nastiness .
And many have a non-mainstream world view which they need to hold on to for a variety of reasons.Many have a mainstream world view which they need to hold on to for a variety of reasons .
Most posters here would be delighted by an idea which wanders from the "straight and narrow" if a convincing case could be made for it. The problem on a forum with a long history like this one is that most longterm posters have already seen the case being made by previous advocates of it, have examined it fairly, and have concluded that it does not stand up.I have never fully understood why so many appear to think that publicly wandering from the intellectual "straight and narrow" has to be avoided at all cost .
Its actually really simple to get, if relatively is to be believed, that gravity is just space compressing down distorting the space time in an area to a smaller spot. Before the event horizon in a black hole time and space are compressed making it seem time is standing still on the inside compared to the outside. If pure space is contained in a place with "less" space and rotated opposite of its gravitational sink, its time dilation effects possibly even reversed (not a reversal in time, but an altered flow of time relative to the outside world) , not exactly as a negative gravity but just reversed core pressure. Like an inverse planet. I know its entirely speculative but its still possible, and in some ways likely. Much more likely in the *Bible is absolutely correct* thing.
Again, what is it we're not supposed to feed?
the birds?
It is if you come from Hawaii and you add in spam. I like to add in my own beans usually Cannellini.