The Physics of God and the Quantum Gravity Theory of Everything

[Resume]

In what journal is this ToE of yours published?

 

[dafydd]

What does infinite knowledge mean?

It's a meaningless phrase.

 

[dafydd]

In what journal is this ToE of yours published?

Tiger Tim's Weekly?

 

[Leumas]

What the Omega Point Theorem demonstrates is that per the known laws of physics (i.e., the Second Law of Thermodynamics, General Relativity, and Quantum Mechanics) life must gain control over all matter in the universe and that life's intelligence must diverge to infinite knowledge going into the final cosmological singularity, termed the Omega Point. See Section 3.1: "The Omega Point" of my above-provided article for the details on that.

Balderdash....hogwash...claptrap....twaddle.

 

[dafydd]

Balderdash....hogwash...claptrap....twaddle.

That's putting it mildly.

 

[Complexity]

Utter nonsense.

 

[Complexity]

Read the article. That's what I wrote it for.

No.

I value my time and my mind. I try not to let garbage in.

 

[James Redford]

What does divergence refer to in this context?

What does infinite knowledge mean?

Diverge here means that the amount of the resource (i.e., energy, processor speed, memory storage, etc.) goes to infinity but that this process takes infinite experiential time to reach infinity. In proper time the Omega Point is reached in one quintillion to ten quintillion years, using the U.S. short scale convention for names of large numbers

Knowledge is veridical information that is in someway useful to sapient beings (even if just useful for entertainment purposes, such as knowledge about games and such).

 

[dafydd]

Did he really expect us to acclaim him as the greatest thinker that science has ever produced? Not by posting claptrap, not by a long shot.

 

[James Redford]

In what journal is this ToE of yours published?

* F. J. Tipler, "The structure of the world from pure numbers", Reports on Progress in Physics, Vol. 68, No. 4 (April 2005), pp. 897-964, doi:10.1088/0034-4885/68/4/R04, bibcode: 2005RPPh...68..897T. http://math.tulane.edu/~tipler/theoryofeverything.pdf Also released as "Feynman-Weinberg Quantum Gravity and the Extended Standard Model as a Theory of Everything", arXiv:0704.3276, April 24, 2007. http://arxiv.org/abs/0704.3276

Out of 50 articles, Prof. Tipler's 2005 Reports on Progress in Physics paper--which presents the Omega Point/Feynman-DeWitt-Weinberg quantum gravity/Standard Model Theory of Everything (TOE)--was selected as one of 12 for the "Highlights of 2005" accolade as "the very best articles published in Reports on Progress in Physics in 2005 [Vol. 68]. Articles were selected by the Editorial Board for their outstanding reviews of the field. They all received the highest praise from our international referees and a high number of downloads from the journal Website." (See Richard Palmer, Publisher, "Highlights of 2005," Reports on Progress in Physics. http://www.webcitation.org/5o9VkK3eE )

Reports on Progress in Physics is the leading journal of the Institute of Physics, Britain's main professional body for physicists. Further, Reports on Progress in Physics has a higher impact factor (according to Journal Citation Reports) than Physical Review Letters, which is the most prestigious American physics journal (one, incidently, which Prof. Tipler has been published in more than once). A journal's impact factor reflects the importance the science community places in that journal in the sense of actually citing its papers in their own papers. (And just to point out, Tipler's 2005 Reports on Progress in Physics paper could not have been published in Physical Review Letters since said paper is nearly book-length, and hence not a "letter" as defined by the latter journal.)

 

[dafydd]

Diverge here means that the amount of the resource (i.e., energy, processor speed, memory storage, etc.) goes to infinity but that this process takes infinite experiential time to reach infinity. In proper time the Omega Point is reached in one quintillion to ten quintillion years, using the U.S. short scale convention for names of large numbers

Knowledge is veridical information that is in someway useful to sapient beings (even if just useful for entertainment purposes, such as knowledge about games and such).

Verdical? Never heard of it. You are entertaining, I'll give you that. Ten quintillion years? We won't hold our breath.

 

[James Redford]

It's a meaningless phrase.

Above I defined what knowledge is in a reply to Twiler. What infinite knowledge is is an infinite number of bits of said information.

 

[dafydd]

* F. J. Tipler, "The structure of the world from pure numbers", Reports on Progress in Physics, Vol. 68, No. 4 (April 2005), pp. 897-964, doi:10.1088/0034-4885/68/4/R04, bibcode: 2005RPPh...68..897T. http://math.tulane.edu/~tipler/theoryofeverything.pdf Also released as "Feynman-Weinberg Quantum Gravity and the Extended Standard Model as a Theory of Everything", arXiv:0704.3276, April 24, 2007. http://arxiv.org/abs/0704.3276

Out of 50 articles, Prof. Tipler's 2005 Reports on Progress in Physics paper--which presents the Omega Point/Feynman-DeWitt-Weinberg quantum gravity/Standard Model Theory of Everything (TOE)--was selected as one of 12 for the "Highlights of 2005" accolade as "the very best articles published in Reports on Progress in Physics in 2005 [Vol. 68]. Articles were selected by the Editorial Board for their outstanding reviews of the field. They all received the highest praise from our international referees and a high number of downloads from the journal Website." (See Richard Palmer, Publisher, "Highlights of 2005," Reports on Progress in Physics. http://www.webcitation.org/5o9VkK3eE )

Reports on Progress in Physics is the leading journal of the Institute of Physics, Britain's main professional body for physicists. Further, Reports on Progress in Physics has a higher impact factor (according to Journal Citation Reports) than Physical Review Letters, which is the most prestigious American physics journal (one, incidently, which Prof. Tipler has been published in more than once). A journal's impact factor reflects the importance the science community places in that journal in the sense of actually citing its papers in their own papers. (And just to point out, Tipler's 2005 Reports on Progress in Physics paper could not have been published in Physical Review Letters since said paper is nearly book-length, and hence not a "letter" as defined by the latter journal.)

He said 'yours'. Were any gods mentioned in the works you cite? I suspect not, this is your fantasy.

 

[dafydd]

Above I defined what knowledge is in a reply to Twiler. What infinite knowledge is is an infinite number of bits of said information.

You do know what the word 'infinite' means? All this has nothing to do with imaginary beings.

 

[James Redford]

He said 'yours'.

Perhaps he's suffering from some brain malady. I tried to be nice by ignoring that part.

 

[dafydd]

Perhaps he's suffering from some brain malady. I tried to be nice by ignoring that part.

Transparent dodge. Why should resume have a brain malady just because he asked you a question about your article? That is a typical wooist response. Where have your works been published?

 

[ynot]

Weird theoretical physics stuff I don’t understand - therefore god.

 

[Mudcat]

Where have your works been published?

In a Jack Trick tract I'd imagine. Or in a crackpot tabloid rag in a disaster movie (the only place where 'physics' like this could conceivably work).

 

[James Redford]

Transparent dodge. Why should resume have a brain malady just because he asked you a question about your article? That is a typical wooist response. Where have your works been published?

Had he and you read the abstract that I provided, then you two ought to have known that it's not my Theory of Everything.

 

[dafydd]

Reading his abstract it became blindingly obvious that his article was not worthy of consideration by any intelligent person. Why he came here I do not know. There are plenty of woo sites that would lap it up and ask for more.