The Oklahoma City Bombing Coverup

fowlsound said:
Originally Posted by Huntster :
Confirmation is proof, not evidence.

What I provided were reports.

If you don't like it, take it up with CNN and the others.
Click to expand...

Sounds like you should call some prosecutors if you have such proof.
Click to expand...

That is very strong evidence that you are not reading my posts, links, and references, and are posting in a randomly swerving manner.

I have already clearly and repeatedly stated that I do not have proof, I have provided a definition of proof, and if I did have such proof, I would provide it to federal prosecutors.

What is your goal here, fowl? Why string this out with questions repeated so many times that are appropriately answered, complete with reference?

Is it me? Are you infatuated with me so much that you become somehow possessed?

Originally Posted by Huntster :
(Turnabout is fair play):

"You can't verify that those reports are confirming as to whether it was al-Zarqawi's or a rival's terror network that beheaded Berg. Hardly evidence or proof. More like speculation"
Click to expand...

Sorry, I'm not making that claim.
Click to expand...

Yet, you agreed with me when I did.

Originally Posted by Huntster :
Oh, PLEASE!

Surely you can't be that far in the dark!

Does anybody else see the unreasonableness of this man?
Click to expand...

You seem to not be willing to back up your statements with cites. Provide one and stop complaining when asked, or admit you have no evidence.
Click to expand...

I'm done with you, foolsound.

You want something from me?

Wait.......................
 
zaayrdragon said:
....I just think neither had jack squat to do with 'insider work' by our own evil gub'ment (I mean, aside from Bush Sr. pissing off the terrorists in both camps during his reign)....
Click to expand...

I agree completely.

And the presidents (both Bushes and Clinton) should have focused on killing the terrorists, not "pissing them off".
 
Huntster said:
That is very strong evidence that you are not reading my posts, links, and references, and are posting in a randomly swerving manner.
Click to expand...

No, I am asking for something substantive. You have not provided that.

Huntster said:
I have already clearly and repeatedly stated that I do not have proof, I have provided a definition of proof, and if I did have such proof, I would provide it to federal prosecutors.
Click to expand...

And I've been asking for evidence. You have neither.

Huntster said:
What is your goal here, fowl? Why string this out with questions repeated so many times that are appropriately answered, complete with reference?

Is it me? Are you infatuated with me so much that you become somehow possessed?
Click to expand...

Well I did offer to cuddle once. You can't simply debate an issue with evidence and cites? Why is it you always seem to throw tantrums when cornered with requests for evidence?





Huntster said:
Yet, you agreed with me when I did.
Click to expand...

I have not agreed to anything. I have been asking for evidence.



Huntster said:
I'm done with you, foolsound.

You want something from me?

Wait.......................
Click to expand...

Well that answers that. No evidence, and no ability to use resoned discourse.
 
Excuse me hunster, you were in the middle of a discussion. It's very rude to put your fingers in your ears, especially as your claims have yet to be backed up by evidence.

fowlsound said:
This is the second time I let your repeated picking piss me off. I believe you played this game purposely, and you achieved your goal.
Click to expand...
Are you honestly blaming your inability to rationally discuss anything on me? It was your actions alone that brought you two moderator warnings. I have not played any game except try to hold you to an evidenciary standard to back up your theories. Since you refuse to provide any on point links (and I had to provide one for your argument) I can only assume you are not here for reasoned discourse on whether there was a connection between OKC and 9/11. It seems you just wish to make testable and verifiable claims and be taken at your word, then become vitriolic when your word is questioned.

Goodbye, fowl. You're my 1st and only electronic ignore.

I don't need to be repeating answers to the point where I loose it.
Click to expand...

If you can't control your anger when discussing anything on this forum (and there is ample examples of your turning to insults when you are asked for evidence or shown your arguments are weak) then I would suggest consulting an anger management therapist.

But since you have no evidence as requested, it seems your contentions are now debunked.

I find it sad I had to provide evidence for you. You seem very willing to request links of others, yet not provide any on point yourself.

Oh well.

ETA:

You had to comment twice on that one post? Wow, you really should keep that temper in check.
Click to expand...
 
Shaun from Scotland said:
I think its Rendez-vous Point - Dragon is a policeman I believe so he should have the definitive answer
Click to expand...
- correct, thought it was a common acronym, apologies.

Wow! couldn't post for a couple of days and look how these threads have grown. Where are the CTers? Anyway, good work guys - you help more than you know.
 
Huntsman said:
I deny this.

I never posted any such thing.

FOR THE UMPTEENTH TIME, I AM NOT HUNTSTER!!!!!!!!!

I have a brain and choose to use it.

Carry on.
Click to expand...
Your temper indicates otherwise. Thank you for stepping into our snare.
 
Gravy said:
Your temper indicates otherwise. Thank you for stepping into our snare.
Click to expand...

LOL

No, but I swear, since he started posting here, everyone has confused him with me. Apparantly, a different name, different avatar, and completely different posting style aren't enough of a clue.

*sigh*

I'm changing my tag from "Oxygen Thief" to "I am NOT Huntster"
 
I never confused the two of you.

I respect HuntsMAN too much for that.
 
My profuse apologies. And as a fan, I should pay more attention. Shame on Trif. Bad Trif. No Cookie for trif.

Trif.
 
Huntsman said:
I deny this.

I never posted any such thing.

FOR THE UMPTEENTH TIME, I AM NOT HUNTSTER!!!!!!!!!

I have a brain and choose to use it.

Carry on.
Click to expand...

Sorry, Huntsman.

It's like Jones and Jonas.

You may as well re-register. I'm a marked man, and there are so many idiots here that can't spell, you're marked with me.

Terrible, isn't it?

Being among so many "intelligent" people who can't spell?
 
conspiracybeliever said:
That is preposterous. Most of you guys will actually go and look for mostly irrelevent dirt on someone before you even address their assertions. You got a few badasses here, I will definitely give you that. Chipmunk comes to mind. But to say "oh, we address facts here, not people" is laughable at best.

And considering there were people yelling all this stuff at Clinton's Justice Department within days of the bombing with him ignoring it and blaming it on his "vast right wing conspiracy", I'd say there might be something to Partin's assessment.
Click to expand...

The vast right wing conspiracy quote was in regards to right wing think tanks and press organs smearing him. I had absolutly nothing to do with OKC.
 
BTW what happened to conspiracybeliever. Did he get banned? I hope not, he hasn't answered some of our questions yet and I want to hear the answers.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom