The Oklahoma City Bombing Coverup

conspiracybeliever

Scholar
C
Joined
Mar 29, 2006
Messages
109
armymath.jpg

University of Wisconson Army Math Building
Bombed with 2,000 lb ANFO bomb in 1970
Discolored bricks show repaired area of damage,
no structural damage whatsoever, though truck
bomb was against wall only 8 ft from column!
Click to expand...

But miraculously, it is capable of this.

murrah2.jpg


gbp01.jpg

General Ben Partin, Ex Head of Air Force Weapons Development

"When I first saw the pictures of the truck bomb's asymmetrical damage to the Federal Building in Oklahoma City my immediate reaction was that the pattern of damage would have been technically impossible without supplementing demolition charges at some of the reinforced concrete column bases."
Click to expand...

Blasteffect.jpeg


Intersting take on all this:

http://www.philipdru.com/okc_stream.html
 
"When I first saw the pictures of the truck bomb's asymmetrical damage to the Federal Building in Oklahoma City my immediate reaction was that the pattern of damage would have been technically impossible without supplementing demolition charges at some of the reinforced concrete column bases."
Click to expand...

Cuz we all know that looking at a picture gives one a far better idea of what happened than actually being there. So his analysis of the situtation trumps that of the investigators who were actually there.

How could I be so blind?
 
Good morning conspiracybeliever.

Since you seem to believe that you are on to something, can you kindly tell us what other buildings are wired to blow so we can do something about it ahead of time?
JPK
 
Nyarlathotep said:
Cuz we all know that looking at a picture gives one a far better idea of what happened than actually being there. So his analysis of the situtation trumps that of the investigators who were actually there.

How could I be so blind?
Click to expand...
I don't know, honestly...lol


Bombed with 2,000 lb ANFO bomb in 1970
Discolored bricks show repaired area of damage,
no structural damage whatsoever, though truck
bomb was against wall only 8 ft from column!
Click to expand...
 
conspiracybeliever said:
As usual a one-liner instead of addressing the info...
Click to expand...
The usual misinterpretaton. I meant that this looks like this would take a bit more work to shoot down than your earlier instance of screaming bloody murder at every white pixel that wasn't where it should have been.

Then again, I know more about digital artifacts than I do about measuring explosive forces.
 
Bombed with 2,000 lb ANFO bomb in 1970
Discolored bricks show repaired area of damage,
no structural damage whatsoever, though truck
bomb was against wall only 8 ft from column!
Click to expand...
Any thoughts? Maybe the sun caused the damage to the columns at OKC?
 
conspiracybeliever said:
Your pixel conspiracy is far from adequate.
Click to expand...
I doubt that. Of course, even if it did fall short, that would mean nothing: You still haven't proven that those whatevers are explosions. Just because a UFO isn't a weather balloon doesn't mean it's an alien spacecraft.
 
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/munitions/explosives-anfo.htm
By one estimate, the bomb used to attack the Alfred Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City on April 19, 1995 consisted of an ANFO explosive main charge of approximately 4,000 pounds, based on an estimate of the Velocities of Detonation [VOD] of approximately 13,000 fps. Other estimates claim that the 1995 explosion that collapsed portions of the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City contained 4,800 pounds of ammonium nitrate and fuel oil. Later estimates suggested that the bomb had in excess of 6,200 pounds of various energetic materials, including explosives other than ANFO, equivalent to 5,000 pounds of TNT. In the Salameh World Trade Center bombing case resulting from the bombing of the World Trade Center (WTC) on February 26, 1993, FBI Explosives Unit examiner David Williams opined that the main explosive used in the bombing consisted of 1,200 pounds of urea nitrate explosive. The FBI chemists specializing in the examination of explosive residue, however, did not find any residue identifying the explosive at the World Trade Center.
Click to expand...
 
Roxdog is dodging again:

http://www.leemark.com/featuredcontent/sterling/sterling.html

a van loaded with six barrels of explosives blew up just outside the East Wing of Sterling Hall at the University of Wisconsin campus in Madison.
Click to expand...

That's a van. Not a U-haul. And only six barrels of the stuff. By comparison, the OK City bomb was 5000 lbs.

Other points is that the bomb went off near the loading section (not exactly the most weakest section of the building) and was exploded near the edge of the building. Add to that is that the building was a brick structure, wheras the Murrah building had large glass windows. Even so, it seems that the building required supports to keep it from collapsing, note the pictures at this link:

http://www.madison.com/library/LEE/sterlinghall.html

The Wisconsin was also set by radicals with little clue. Given the fact that it ended the sizeable anti-war protests on the campus cold, it almost seems to be more likely to be the result of conspiracy than OK City.

Apples to Oranges. With a CT twist on top.

But hey. I'm just guessing with a bit logic. Let's hear all the Structural Engineers, Demolition Experts, and other relevant fields who've studied the cases for the past 10-30years and see how much they agree with the CT. Surely in all this time many of them have spoken out on this topic, right?
 
conspiracybeliever said:
General Ben Partin, Ex Head of Air Force Weapons Development
Click to expand...
Interesting. Do you agree with General Partin that UAL flight 93 was shot down, or with the Loosers that there was no civilian plane crashed into Shanksville, PA. If you disagree with the General there, on what basis to you agree with him here?
 
JPK said:
....Since you seem to believe that you are on to something, can you kindly tell us what other buildings are wired to blow so we can do something about it ahead of time?....
Click to expand...

Probably very few, if any.

But it would be kinda nice if we could do the right thing afterwards (instead of being misdirected, or given half the story), wouldn't it?
 
conspiracybeliever said:
Any thoughts? Maybe the sun caused the damage to the columns at OKC?
Click to expand...

It requires no explanation from us as none of us are making a claim. BUt what the hey. Different explosions under different circumstances on differnet buildings will cause different effects.

Now perhaps you would care to explain what evidence you have that the explosion at the Alfred P Murrah building should have had the same effect as the one in your photo.
 
So the General that was Head of Air Force Weapons Development is a conspiracy theorist? Good to know. You guys are so smart.

Listen to the link. Their were bombs in the Alfred P Murrah building.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom