The Missiles at Ground Zero

There were a flurry of 911 calls to the police after the second plane hit WTC 2 (9:03) saying they saw missiles.
Do a search on "Woolworth building" and "missile".
The citizens of New York City saw missiles.
 
MaGZ said:
Here is the NIST diagram showing the gaping hole on the south side of WTC 7. Also fire-fighters reported seeing this huge hole with smoke coming out of it.

http://oceanmirage.homestead.com/files/wtc7damage.jpg
Click to expand...

Hey, let's present the NIST images in their original context. Link to NIST websites if you're interested in any form of credibility.

Actually, since you're so interested in the damage to WTC 7, I was wondering if I could get your take on the image seen on page 17 of this presentation:
http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/WTC Part IIC - WTC 7 Collapse Final.pdf

How does that damage indicate any form of missile attack?
 
The Almond said:
Hey, let's present the NIST images in their original context. Link to NIST websites if you're interested in any form of credibility.

Actually, since you're so interested in the damage to WTC 7, I was wondering if I could get your take on the image seen on page 17 of this presentation:
http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/WTC Part IIC - WTC 7 Collapse Final.pdf

How does that damage indicate any form of missile attack?
Click to expand...

Not to mention how would an Air to Air missle cause that much damage to a building? Unless they were trying to shoot down an airliner with a Tomahawk.
 
pagan said:
Mu dear squirrel. Why do you have this urge to kiss yankie butt?

You know, they are the bad guys killing Muslims all over the planet.

OK, really basic stuff here. Like 1 2 3 The Bush adm is bad. Are you with me here?
Click to expand...

I'm getting sick of this. Here is what I constantly get from conspiracy theorists:

"Why do you believe the official story, when you should believe the planes were flown by remote control and filled with explosives?"

"Why do you believe the official story, when you should believe the buildings were pre-wired with explosives?"

"Why do you believe the official story, when you should believe that the buildings were destroyed by a Death Ray?"

"Why do you believe the official story, when you should believe a missile hit the Pentagon?"

"Why do you believe the official story, when you should believe that flight 93 never really crashed and the passengers were offloaded in Cleveland?"

"Why do you believe the official story, when you should believe that flight 93 was actually shot down?"

"Why do you believe the official story, when you should believe that NORAD failed to shoot down any airliners?"

"Why do you believe the official story, when you should believe that the planes were hijacked by Joooooos with guns?"

"Why do you believe the official story, when you should believe that the planes were really just holograms?"

So, on the one hand, we have the "official story", which is consistent with all the evidence and which ALWAYS STAYS THE SAME. On the other hand, we have an endless parade of mind-numbingly stupid alternate stories so outlandish that Roald Dahl wouldn't have been caught dead using them.

And you think accepting the first option is "kissing yankie butt"?

Oh, the idiocy...
 
MaGZ said:
There were a flurry of 911 calls to the police after the second plane hit WTC 2 (9:03) saying they saw missiles.
Do a search on "Woolworth building" and "missile".
The citizens of New York City saw missiles.
Click to expand...

All of them?

And this is corroborated by what evidence?
 
babazaroni said:
MAGZ, I take it you are no longer claiming the missile is visible in the Flight 175: As the World Watched video?

What happened?

The video is available on the web. If you think the missile is on the video, then show us where.

If you can't, then your are just plain feeble.
Click to expand...

Yes, I still maintain that film shows the missile falling toward WTC 7 seconds after the plane hit WTC 2. The missile had lost its target and was in free fall. This footage was taken by Gedeon Naudet at the corner of Broadway and Vessey.
In the Naudet film Gedeon claims to be one block closer to the WTC at Vessey and Church.
This footage (at Vessey and Church) was taken by someone unknown with the missile explosion edited out.
Look at the Naudet documentary.
 
MaGZ said:
There were a flurry of 911 calls to the police after the second plane hit WTC 2 (9:03) saying they saw missiles.
Do a search on "Woolworth building" and "missile".
The citizens of New York City saw missiles.
Click to expand...

No. I already went through your last series of links which said nothing about missles at all. I am not going on a wild goose chace to find evidence for you.

You provide the evidence. You say the citizens of New York City saw missles, now back it up.
 
MaGZ said:
I’m not saying a missile hit the Pentagon. I’m maintaining fighters were sent out of Otis fired upon the second plane as it was heading toward WTC 2, missed and hit WTC 7 and an open parking area northwest of the WTC complex.

I believe the military did everything it could to defend America that day including shooting down flight 93 over PA.
Click to expand...


No, you are missing my point, and not answering my question. In NYC, do you believe the many members of the military required to be complicit in the theory you advance were willing to sacrifice their honor, to lie, to deceive the American people?

For your theory to be correct, you must answer "yes." And if so, I must ask if you have served any time in uniform, and if you have any sense of what military service is truly like?
 
Redtail said:
Not to mention how would an Air to Air missle cause that much damage to a building? Unless they were trying to shoot down an airliner with a Tomahawk.
Click to expand...

Given the proximity of other tall buildings in the area, that seems wildly unlikely.
 
MaGZ said:
No, as you can see they are two different events.

http://911studies.com/911photostudies119.htm
The 9:04 white cloud is from the missile explosion of WTC 7.
The second picture the collapse of WTC 2 about an hour later. The white cloud at 9:04 can also be seen in the Naudet documentary.
Click to expand...

No that's the collapse of the South Tower. The North Tower is blocking out the South Tower from view.

ETA: Yeah it's explained here http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=7160274150347523777&q=not+in+plane+sight


ETAA: And up there in baba's post too. :)
 
Last edited:
MaGZ said:
No, as you can see they are two different events.

http://911studies.com/911photostudies119.htm
The 9:04 white cloud is from the missile explosion of WTC 7.
The second picture the collapse of WTC 2 about an hour later. The white cloud at 9:04 can also be seen in the Naudet documentary.
Click to expand...

Well MaGZ, what do you have to say for yourself now that we've shown you the huge dust cloud was the South Tower collapsing?

And how could you possibly think that a missile carrying only 25-50 lbs of explosives could create a debris cloud dwarfing a 47 story building?
 
MaGZ said:
No, as you can see they are two different events.

http://911studies.com/911photostudies119.htm
The 9:04 white cloud is from the missile explosion of WTC 7.
The second picture the collapse of WTC 2 about an hour later. The white cloud at 9:04 can also be seen in the Naudet documentary.
Click to expand...

No you have been duped. Lied to. Tricked. The smoke is from the first tower falling. Got Video?

You have been fooled. There were no missiles. They do not make big clouds. The are little fast things that go bang. Little dust cloud.

How easy are you fooled?
 
MaGZ said:
Yes, I still maintain that film shows the missile falling toward WTC 7 seconds after the plane hit WTC 2. The missile had lost its target and was in free fall. This footage was taken by Gedeon Naudet at the corner of Broadway and Vessey.
In the Naudet film Gedeon claims to be one block closer to the WTC at Vessey and Church.
This footage (at Vessey and Church) was taken by someone unknown with the missile explosion edited out.
Look at the Naudet documentary.
Click to expand...


Dude, it's a damn BIRD! A BIRD!

Are you even reading the links we're giving you?

http://www.inlex.net/bluemonk/nonsense/intro.html

http://www.inlex.net/bluemonk/nonsense/images/wct_sh2_animated.gif
 
MaGZ said:
Yes, I still maintain that film shows the missile falling toward WTC 7 seconds after the plane hit WTC 2. The missile had lost its target and was in free fall.
Click to expand...

Why ? Engine problems ?

This footage (at Vessey and Church) was taken by someone unknown with the missile explosion edited out.
Click to expand...

Do yo know what the word "speculation" means ?

The 9:04 white cloud is from the missile explosion of WTC 7.
Click to expand...

DO YOU KNOW THE YIELD OF AN AIR-AIR MISSILE ?
 
mattlodder said:
Dude, it's a damn BIRD! A BIRD!

Are you even reading the links we're giving you?

http://www.inlex.net/bluemonk/nonsense/intro.html

wct_sh2_animated.gif"
Click to expand...

It does look like a bird. I could never see it from the NJ video. And based on the CT ideas it would have been a big missile. An air to building buster missile. lol
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom