• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

The Missiles at Ground Zero

Is this the missile?

8790459bca6f69ef9.jpg



Oh, no, that's just MaGZ after hitting the Wall of Reality.​
 
MaGZ said:
Hutch,
You might want to read a description of the damage done to the southern face of WTC 7 and determine which type of missile was used.

Also take a look at the NOAA photo of Ground Zero (large file) Look at the parking area northwest of WTC where the burnt cars are. Find the black crater caused by the missile from the second fighter.
Click to expand...
The missles were hijacked passenger planes flown into the building. End of discussion.

If you think anything other than that, seek help for your delusions. Now.
 
Since 9/11, New York City has installed a number of Gravyeon Gravyot missile batteries, which are capable of all-weather defense against advanced pigeon threats.

879045c54caf3a8b3.jpg


879045c54aa88a764.jpg

​
 
Last edited:
Gravy said:
Since 9/11, New York City has installed a number of Gravyeon Gravyot missile batteries, which are capable of all-weather defense against advanced pigeon threats.

[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/879045c54caf3a8b3.jpg[/qimg]

[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/879045c54aa88a764.jpg[/qimg]
​
Click to expand...

Fox Lane High! Go, Bedford! Of all the bedroom communities in Westchester, Bedford is certainly one of them.
 
A W Smith said:
AHA I saw it!! it was an effin BIRD!

HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAA

what a FOOL you are!!
Click to expand...
It's the same thing that Carlos and latinjrl were trying to claim the $1 million 3 years ago. They said it was a "paranormal hat". That thread was "has anyone seen a realistice" in it's staying power, eventually it was locked and the idiots banned after they got increasingly belligerent. At least Christophera is nice in his lunacy.
 
The Doc said:
Here is a serious logic flaw in your theory MaGZ.

Let's for one second pretend that it was possible to rig WTC7 up for demolition without anybody noticing. Just pretend, I know it seems stupid but just pretend.

Ok so the demolition team walks into the building (before or during 9/11) to plant the charges to destroy the "Secret Government Files™". So the demolition team begins placing the explosives. Let's just pretend for a second that no one has seen them yet, no one has heard the drilling and the explosives are being placed in a manner where no one will see them.

What is stopping them from stealing/destroying the files with the access they were granted to place demolitions?!

Please, provide me an answer and you damn well better back it up.
Click to expand...

The purpose of the national security team in pulling the building would be to save the sensitive files and hard dives not to destroy them. Once the building was down, the remains could be taken to a secret location and all of the sensitive material could be retrieved and secured.
 
MaGZ said:
The purpose of the national security team in pulling the building would be to save the sensitive files and hard dives not to destroy them. Once the building was down, the remains could be taken to a secret location and all of the sensitive material could be retrieved and secured.
Click to expand...

So, the best way of stealing something is to "blow up" the building it's in, and then you just go through all the rubble where, presumably, the item is unharmed....

Man, you should be writing scripts in Hollywood!
 
MaGZ said:
The purpose of the national security team in pulling the building would be to save the sensitive files and hard dives not to destroy them. Once the building was down, the remains could be taken to a secret location and all of the sensitive material could be retrieved and secured.
Click to expand...

So the files and hard disks will be easily distinguish from the files and hard disks belonging to the other organisations in the building? They'll be easy to get out of the rubble of the building? It'll be easy to take them away to a secret location, presumably by only allowing security personnel to work on the WTC7 rubble pile? Dropping a burning building on them isn't going to damage or destroy them?

If it was safe enough to send a demolition team in (which nobody saw), why not just send a team in to take the files out? Why not send firefighters in to fight the fire?

Lastly, do you really believe that the government would keep the only copies of secret files in a commercially leased and shared office building in New York?
 
NorwegianSquirrel said:
So, the best way of stealing something is to "blow up" the building it's in, and then you just go through all the rubble where, presumably, the item is unharmed....

Man, you should be writing scripts in Hollywood!
Click to expand...

Mu dear squirrel. Why do you have this urge to kiss yankie butt?

You know, they are the bad guys killing Muslims all over the planet.

OK, really basic stuff here. Like 1 2 3 The Bush adm is bad. Are you with me here?
 
pagan said:
Mu dear squirrel. Why do you have this urge to kiss yankie butt?

You know, they are the bad guys killing Muslims all over the planet.

OK, really basic stuff here. Like 1 2 3 The Bush adm is bad. Are you with me here?
Click to expand...

Stupidity + Anti-Americanism = Conspiracy Theorist
Stupidity + Religion = Creationist
Stupidity + Religion + Anti-Americanism = Suicide bomber
 
pagan said:
Mu dear squirrel. Why do you have this urge to kiss yankie butt?

You know, they are the bad guys killing Muslims all over the planet.

OK, really basic stuff here. Like 1 2 3 The Bush adm is bad. Are you with me here?
Click to expand...

I'm not kissing anybody, or any of their body parts.

The rest of your post doesn't deserve a reply.
 
NorwegianSquirrel said:
So, the best way of stealing something is to "blow up" the building it's in, and then you just go through all the rubble where, presumably, the item is unharmed....

Man, you should be writing scripts in Hollywood!
Click to expand...


The national security team had to pull the building for two reasons. Their purpose was to secure information not to steal it.

First, the building was damaged (southwest corner) and would have fallen toward its weakest point eventually. This would have endangered the rescue teams efforts where the other WTC buildings once stood.

Second, they had to have control of the sensitive information that was in WTC 7.
 
MaGZ said:
The national security team had to pull the building for two reasons. Their purpose was to secure information not to steal it.

First, the building was damaged (southwest corner) and would have fallen toward its weakest point eventually. This would have endangered the rescue teams efforts where the other WTC buildings once stood.

Second, they had to have control of the sensitive information that was in WTC 7.
Click to expand...

You. Are. Not. Making. Any. Sense.
 
maccy said:
So the files and hard disks will be easily distinguish from the files and hard disks belonging to the other organisations in the building? They'll be easy to get out of the rubble of the building? It'll be easy to take them away to a secret location, presumably by only allowing security personnel to work on the WTC7 rubble pile? Dropping a burning building on them isn't going to damage or destroy them?

If it was safe enough to send a demolition team in (which nobody saw), why not just send a team in to take the files out? Why not send firefighters in to fight the fire?

Lastly, do you really believe that the government would keep the only copies of secret files in a commercially leased and shared office building in New York?
Click to expand...

From: The Missiles at Ground Zero
WTC 7 was a 47-story building which stood north of the Twin Towers on Vesey Street. The building collapsed under mysterious circumstances at 5:20 in the afternoon on September 11. Many of the nation's top national security and financial agencies had offices in the building, including the Defense Department, the Securities and Exchange Commission, the IRS, the Secret Service and the Central Intelligence Agency. WTC 7 also held Mayor Rudy Giuliani's emergency command post, located on the 23rd floor.
Click to expand...

After WTC 7 was pulled the military was brought in to secure the area. WTC 7 was given priority for the cleanup. Those who trucked away the remain of course would know which military base the material was taken to. If some files were destroyed in the CD of WTC 7 then that would not be a problem. The purpose of the CD was to secure the sensitive information.
 
MaGZ said:
From: The Missiles at Ground Zero


After WTC 7 was pulled the military was brought in to secure the area. WTC 7 was given priority for the cleanup. Those who trucked away the remain of course would know which military base the material was taken to. If some files were destroyed in the CD of WTC 7 then that would not be a problem. The purpose of the CD was to secure the sensitive information.
Click to expand...

Was Tom Clancy there taking notes?

So you're saying that they blew up the building to protect sensitive information? By "protect" do you mean "destroy"? I'm lost on your hypothesis.
 
MaGZ you have an interesting concept of what constitutes 'evidence'.

Hint: conjecture is not evidence. Your whole theory relies on the WTC collapse being mysterious. Our position, and the one held by the vast majority of experts world-wide, is that the collapse although unusual was not mysterious.

You believe the collapse was mysterious because you HAVE TO in order for your theory to even have a minuscule chance. I can see why you don't want to let go of that.
 
HyJinX said:
Was Tom Clancy there taking notes?

So you're saying that they blew up the building to protect sensitive information? By "protect" do you mean "destroy"? I'm lost on your hypothesis.
Click to expand...

I'm beginning to suspect MaGZ is a novelist doing research. If not he needs to be.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom