• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

The mere belief in Hell makes you a more evil person.

Cello Man

Graduate Poster
Joined
Sep 7, 2006
Messages
1,035
I haven't posted in R&P in a while, just thought I should stir the pot a little.

The concept of eternal torment makes no sense, since there is nothing to be gained from it unless you're a dyed in the wool torturer.

Let's take a look at the reasons for punishments and rewards as it applies to parenting.

Sane parents treat their kids and let them do fun things. But kids don't always act on their best behavior. If your children do something bad, they are usually punished in some form. Depending on the offense, you might give them a stern talking to, take away a favorite toy for a while, or swat them on the behind.

Whatever form the punishment takes, the whole point is to make your child aware that what they did was bad. That way they can mature and make a better decision later in life. It sucks having to be "that guy" for a short time, but the kid's got to learn somehow. And since you love them, you want them to have good moral judgment when they grow up.

So, the punishment is temporary, but it serves a purpose.

Now, according to the Big 3 monotheistic religions, the equation for punishment and reward changes on the divine scale. Suddenly eternal punishment is on the table. The Big 3 say we're all God's children and he loves us. But supposedly an infinite being has his limits(!)

To the parents out there: Can you imagine your child doing something so horrible that you not only feel the need to punish them, but condemn them to an eternity of suffering? Of course not.

The reason is: If punishment is eternal, then it cannot serve a purpose.

Those who are punished eternally cannot change for the better, even if a lesson is learned. Since they're trapped in Hell, they can't make good based on what they've learned from their punishment.

To me, the very concept of Hell just illustrates how sadistic and evil the men were who first imagined it. It's one thing to hate your fellow man and want to see him suffer, but believing that he deserves eternal Hell is infinitely disproportionate punishment. Even holding open the possibility that your own child could ever deserve Hell raises fears in my mind regarding how this belief gets projected onto the real life parent/child relationship.

Now some people I've talked to in real life take what I call the moderate "hands off" view of Hell:
"Well, I don't hate you, but I just don't want to see you go to Hell for what you believe."
This view still posits the existence of the infinitely cruel and fickle punisher God, which they show deference to for fear of their own soul. While the religious moderate indeed may not actively hate me, they still believe on some fundamental level that I honestly deserve to go to Hell for the mere act of doubting God's existence. This must require a certain compartmentalization of hatred and paranoia of outsiders that I simply do not possess.

So, the conclusion. The mere belief in Hell makes you a more evil person. I say this because even if you don't actually hate someone, subconsciously this belief requires a sociopathic indifference towards the suffering of others, while you believe you'll enjoy all the pleasures of Heaven with nothing but the clearest conscience.
 
Last edited:
Many Christians do not see Hell as a place of torture, but rather a separation from god. Considering I have spent pretty much my entire life separated from god, I can't see how it could be considered much of a punishment. :confused:
 
It isn't forever. There is a second death in the lake of fire, that's the end of your existence. So for those people who don't believe in God, no point in bothering with him if you don't want to live forever, because you will cease to exist someday.
 
While the religious moderate indeed may not actively hate me, they still believe on some fundamental level that I honestly deserve to go to Hell for the mere act of doubting God's existence.

Mind-reading? And not doing it very well, either; in at least one Gallup poll, over 40% of respondents said that atheists could enter into heaven if they live virtuously. I know for a fact that my parents are religious moderates who do not believe that you deserve to go to hell for doubting God's existence.

Never a very good idea to try to tar millions of people with the same brush...

Furthermore, you're grossly oversimplifying the matter. I know for a fact that across the world, thousands of people are being raped and murdered; that thousands of people are dead of natural disaster in China; and that life's pretty crummy for a lot of people apart from that. And I still can still read, and drink, and and hang around with my friends with, as you put it, "the clearest conscience." So can most other people; on that point, what you're trying to label sociopathy is really just human nature.
 
Last edited:
Hi,

You might enjoy this:

http://christian-universalism.blogs.com/GM_Justice.pdf

By the way - there are plenty of Christians who think hell may be temporary for some simply because it does serve a purpose. And there are also many Christians who believe it will be temporary for all (although of varying degrees of lengths of time - if time is even applicable once you've entered eternity.)
 
It isn't forever. There is a second death in the lake of fire, that's the end of your existence. So for those people who don't believe in God, no point in bothering with him if you don't want to live forever, because you will cease to exist someday.
It's not that I wouldn't want to live forever. If I had evidence that was the case, then I'd believe it. For one thing, I'm curious to see what kind of music people will be writing a million years from now (if the concept of music itself even survives that long).
Mind-reading? And not doing it very well, either; in at least one Gallup poll, over 40% of respondents said that atheists could enter into heaven if they live virtuously.
I guess the person I talked to that gave rise to this rant was a 60% kind of guy.
...what you're trying to label sociopathy is really just human nature.
Fair point on the larger scale. What I meant to include under the "sociopathic" label was the idea of a parent who could enjoy heaven knowing their own child was in hell.
By the way - there are plenty of Christians who think hell may be temporary for some simply because it does serve a purpose. And there are also many Christians who believe it will be temporary for all (although of varying degrees of lengths of time - if time is even applicable once you've entered eternity.)
It's always encouraging to see religion questioning itself.

Good replies so far. I enjoy having this forum as a sounding board, and it's given me ample food for thought.
 
Last edited:
Since Christians are making it up as they go along, it is unfair to attribute any specific beliefs to Christians as a whole. Since they imagine whatever makes them feel most good about themselves, and craft their belief system out of those specific delusions, I'm sure that there are plenty of Christians who don't think we'll burn in hell.
 
Hi,

You might enjoy this:

http://christian-universalism.blogs.com/GM_Justice.pdf

By the way - there are plenty of Christians who think hell may be temporary for some simply because it does serve a purpose. And there are also many Christians who believe it will be temporary for all (although of varying degrees of lengths of time - if time is even applicable once you've entered eternity.)

Since this contradicts the bible, why do some Christians think this?

Are they really christians if they think this, or are they some other form of liberal religion, cherry picking certain aspects of the bible and ignoring others?
 
Since this contradicts the bible, why do some Christians think this?

Are they really christians if they think this, or are they some other form of liberal religion, cherry picking certain aspects of the bible and ignoring others?

All Christians cherry-pick... no decent person could be a Christian without ignoring the disgusting bits.
 
I agree, and I if i were a christian this fact would concern me.

As a non-Christian, I'm sort of glad that most Christians are leaps and bounds more moral than their stupid little superstitions suggest they should be. :D
 
As a non-Christian, I'm sort of glad that most Christians are leaps and bounds more moral than their stupid little superstitions suggest they should be. :D

Agreed. Although you would hope they would go one step further...

"Hang on a second, if this is supposed to be the word of god why is it so horrible and contradictory? Why would there be the necessity to cherry pick?
Hmmmm perhaps it was made up by men, not god. Perhaps it only seems real to me because of tradition and legacy in my society and the introduction of religious ideals into my life at such an early age. Perhaps the idea of a god was the best explanation that primitive people were able to muster for our existence before science had better answers. Perhaps I have been wasting my time, squandering my only chance to exist following the rules of a non existant dictator."

Oh well, dreams are free. :)
 
Yeah, dreams are free... and meaningless. We can only hope that some small number of religious people realize how idiotic their religious faith really is, and reject it.
 
Fair point on the larger scale. What I meant to include under the "sociopathic" label was the idea of a parent who could enjoy heaven knowing their own child was in hell.
Jose and Kitty Menendez!
 
It isn't forever. There is a second death in the lake of fire, that's the end of your existence. So for those people who don't believe in God, no point in bothering with him if you don't want to live forever, because you will cease to exist someday.

Do you believe this, or are you just reporting what you've heard?
If you believe it, what is the basis for this belief?
 
Many Christians do not see Hell as a place of torture, but rather a separation from god. Considering I have spent pretty much my entire life separated from god, I can't see how it could be considered much of a punishment. :confused:

This is a major league "moving the goalposts" cheat by Christians.

When faced with the idiocy of an eternity in Hell for most people vs. "a kind and loving god", they could not reconcile it (and properly so), so they invented this new idea.


In any case, either it's a mildly severe punishment, in which case God, anyways, is still evil, or it's just like making us "bad people" like the kid left behind on a trip to Disney World because he didn't take out the garbage.

What that could be in Heaven, I don't know, other than continuous orgasms with brief interludes of filet mignon with black pepper cream sauce and ripe cherries and strawberries for desert. But that's not how Heaven is imagined now, is it?

They imagine it as them, ignorant buffoons, walking around being told stuff 'n secrets of the universe 'n things by God!
 
It's not that I wouldn't want to live forever.

Forever, as in googleplex to the googleplex years "and you're just getting started", I don't know.

But 70 years "if you're lucky" is way, way too damned short.
 
Many Christians do not see Hell as a place of torture, but rather a separation from god. Considering I have spent pretty much my entire life separated from god, I can't see how it could be considered much of a punishment. :confused:

Yes, but the rejoinder would be, since you haven't had god in your life, you don't know what you're missing.

(Altogether now, sing, "Smiley, Happy People.")




M.
 
Now, according to the Big 3 monotheistic religions, the equation for punishment and reward changes on the divine scale. Suddenly eternal punishment is on the table. The Big 3 say we're all God's children and he loves us. But supposedly an infinite being has his limits(!)
That'd be Christianity, Islam and Sikhism. As far as I know, hell is merely a metaphor in Sikhism. Evil is punished through reincarnation, thus giving a chance for betterment, so this line of reasoning does not apply there.

As for other religions, many hold the view that hell is not in fact as much a punishment as heaven is a priviledge. For the worse descriptions of hell (not stopping at "separation from God", but going into detailed stories of torment and suffering), I can't really say I understand that viewpoint, but as usual the problem is that people are tugging at the religion from all sides, making it inconsistent. As all religions have been tugged at like that for a long time, it's not strange that they have a hard time getting all the viewpoints working together.

That said, I am really disturbed by many takes on the whole Hell/Heaven system. For instance, ideas of how those in hell will be able to see the suffering of those in hell for their own enjoyment. I can understand how those ideas came about - and it's sad that humanity's thirst for vengeance has worked itself so far into religion, which supposedly exists to refine our morals and relieve us of earthly flaws and desires. Truly sad. :(
 
Last edited:

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom