The issue of polygamy

1inChrist said:
I'M A MALE.
That doesn't answer my question.
Are you looking for a new boyfriend? Is that why you keep hitting on Operaider? Like a 6YO who keeps stealing my toys to make me chase after her...
Hey! Wanna play kiss chase?
 
1inChrist said:
I'M NOT!! YOU AND THE BUDDHIST GUY KEEP BRINGING THEM UP.
Wow, I never realized you thought of me in that way.
Is that why you started posting in the polygamy thread?
Are you fantasizing about me and "the Buddhist guy"?
 
Kimpatsu said:
That doesn't answer my question.
Are you looking for a new boyfriend? Is that why you keep hitting on Operaider? Like a 6YO who keeps stealing my toys to make me chase after her...
Hey! Wanna play kiss chase?
YOU ARE SICK AND YOU ARE IN DANGER OF THE HELLFIRE.
 
1inChrist said:
NO I AM NOT AN APE. I AM A HUMAN BEING WHO WAS CREATED IN GOD'S IMAGE. PERIOD.
Now you're bringing the female menstrual cycle into it... :rolleyes:
 
neutrino_cannon said:
Yeah... I think I'll stay away from that for something a little more innocuous sounding and socially acceptable... like extreme fetish S&M.

I'm curious, if you're willing to say more of course, about the pagan polyamourous subculture.

What's to say, really? Many Pagan faiths - including many sects of Wicca (sex of Wicca?) hold sexuality to be a sacred act, indeed, a holy ritual. Sex is removed from the confines of married relationships and entered into the socially acceptable arena of public spiritual behavior - for some.

Frankly, if I even brought up 'getting it on' with some Temple member at ritual with my wife within earshot, I'd be the next ritual sacrifice! :D

And many Pagans and Wiccans hold that love is a universal trait, an aspect of the Divine, which Man can only attempt to constrain to simplified relationships. Let's face it - most people, at one point or another, find themselves in the difficult position of being attracted to more than one person - otherwise, there wouldn't be so much extramarital sex going on, would there?

Many Pagan families tend to be highly dynamic, anyway, with women coming and going as they see fit, and husbands shared from time to time among whatever women occupy the house at any given time... Not our house (darn it :D) but some houses. Other Pagan families eschew the idea of marriage altogether, and their local temple/coven/gathering is sort of one big, extended, pseudo-hippie communal family.

Oh, we could probably write books about the Poly-Pagan subculture - but I really try not to get too involved in it (for a number of reasons).

Which brings up an interestingg subject, are there any homosexual relationships with more than two members?

Oddly enough, I haven't heard of any COMMITTED homosexual relationships with multiple members - BIsexual, yes, but not HOMOsexual. Now, if we're talking NON-committed - well, that's a ho of a different color.

You can only have a Christian FRIENDship. NOT A CHRISTIAN HOMOSEXUAL RELATIONSHIP BECAUSE HOMOSEXUALITY IS WRONG IN GOD'S EYES.

You know, 1-in - you're obsessed. God was against rape, not homosexuality.

Really - try reading a Bible sometime, instead of T-shirt logos.
 
Operaider said:
Wow, I never realized you thought of me in that way.
Is that why you started posting in the polygamy thread?
Are you fantasizing about me and "the Buddhist guy"?

YOU ARE SICK AND YOU ARE IN DANGER OF THE HELLFIRE.
 
1inChrist said:
NO I AM NOT AN APE. I AM A HUMAN BEING WHO WAS CREATED IN GOD'S IMAGE. PERIOD.
Just a quick question, something that's always bothered me.

If god is omnipotent, omnipresent and omniscient, what does he need arms, legs, eyes, or any sort of body for?
 
1inChrist said:
THE ONLY PURPOSE OF SEX IS TO BRING THE NEXT GENERATION INTO THE WORLD.
Then you're missing out on so much. And you and the Pope obviously have the same opinion. I never took you for a Papist.
 
1inChrist said:
YOU ARE SICK AND YOU ARE IN DANGER OF THE HELLFIRE.

地獄火是您將去的地方如果您現在不接受邏輯
 
zaayrdragon said:
Oddly enough, I haven't heard of any COMMITTED homosexual relationships with multiple members - BIsexual, yes, but not HOMOsexual. Now, if we're talking NON-committed - well, that's a ho of a different color.
See my post at bottom of page 2.
 
1inChrist said:
THE ONLY PURPOSE OF SEX IS TO BRING THE NEXT GENERATION INTO THE WORLD.
Perhaps, perhaps not--all I said was that God must think we need a little help with that.:p
 
wollery said:
See my post at bottom of page 2.

Thank you - now I've heard of one.

Makes me relieved, actually. I had started to worry that homosexuals have a better moral code regarding committed relationships than bisexuals or heterosexuals! :D
 
I know some people in multiple-partner relationships. Not legally married, any of them, but still living together in every sense. Some work out, some don't. The key seems to be controlling jealousy. If point A on the triangle gets jealous of point B spending time with point C, it's not going to work. But as long as everyone makes an effort to make sure nobody's being left out, it seems to function quite well.


Although I'm sure I'm inviting a flood of unpunctuated preaching from a certain idiot, I should mention that I gave a three-way relationship a try once. It didn't take long for me to realize that it wouldn't work--the other two were much better off as a couple. Point A was getting jealous of Point B's interest in the monkey. So I left gracefully and as far as I know, they're still together. I'm not saying I wouldn't try it again, but I'd be more cautious about the whole jealousy dynamic. It all sounds like fun, but like most things in life, it's probably just as big a headache.
 
[modu]I've been asked to close this thread as it is has been completely derailed. I have not read the entire thing, but based on the opening post and the third page, it is easy to see that this is the case. I tend to reserve locking threads for two reasons (1) to give over-heated participants a chance to cool down or (2) to give the mod team a chance to review a situation.

In this particular case, the over-heated participants are arguing over an off-topic flame war. My inclenation is to just move the thread to Flame Wars and be done with it. However, I'm going to attempt to appeal to the board's better, more rational and civil, nature and formally ask that the participants in this thread kindly stick to the topic. Let's behave like adults here, please.[/modu]
 

Back
Top Bottom