The Heiwa Challenge

Status
Not open for further replies.
Heiwa said:
The rules are at post #1. They are simple, friendly and lively, JREF style. Whatever structure you enter in The Heiwa Challenge, self-design/construct or copy/paste/same/same you have to drop the top, only using gravity and demonstrate by counting, 1, 2 3 ..., the results. Not too difficult.

Videos of controlled demolitions, CD, of all kinds do not count as they just support the opposite of the purpose of The Heiwa Challenge! We all know about CD. The WTC destructions on 911 look like very bad CD with parts blowing out in all directions like a fountain.

Anybody knows that gravity alone cannot produce that. The Challenge is to prove the opposite. Gravity acting on a small top part being dropped destroys the bigger lower part ... only by gravity. Prove it. Drop the top and show it. Can you produce a fountain of broken elements of the lower part by dropping the top, then just do it!

Clear?
Click to expand...

I must have missed it in your 10 rules... where again does it say that I have to construct the structure, or that I cannot use video evidence of said structures crushdown?

Citation please.

of course, you also offered a million bucks to anyone who could prove it happens (you lied about that btw) and are full of crapola.
 
Heiwa, you lost, face it. You could at l;east buy someone 6 pizzas instead of the money you offered. And you could keep the boxes to build your next project.
 
Newtons Bit said:
There's a difference between being unable to understand something and intentionally misunderstanding something so that you don't have to admit fault.

I'd argue that Heiwa suffers from the latter.
Click to expand...

You're probably right but it's funny either way. And since total incompetence is more entertaining than clumsy dodging I'll keep pretending he's the real deal and not just another troll.
 
Heiwa said:
The French technique de vérinage is quite simple and ensures destruction of the composite structure - mostly bricks of various types and concrete, some of it reinforced. In order to do so you have to modify the lower structural part to become weaker than the upper structural part.
Click to expand...

And there you have the classic Heiwa technique. When reality disagrees with your fantasies, simply tell barefaced lies, and hope that the feeble-minded believe you.

Dave
 
Dave Rogers said:
And there you have the classic Heiwa technique. When reality disagrees with your fantasies, simply tell barefaced lies, and hope that the feeble-minded believe you.

Dave
Click to expand...


But you don't understand Dave! You see, since the smaller part A cannot globally crush-down the larger part C, per Heiwa's world famous axiom(you can google it you know, and if it's in Google - it must be troo!), it's apparent that the structure must somehow be pre-weakened in the verniage technique. It has to be. It simply doesn't matter what the demo crews said in their interviews about not pre-weakening the lower sections of the buildings. Evidently, they do because.....

....the smaller part A cannot globally crush-down the larger part C, per Heiwa's world famous axiom!


Hope that clears it up for you!

/sarcasm
 
TruthersLie said:
I must have missed it in your 10 rules... where again does it say that I have to construct the structure, or that I cannot use video evidence of said structures crushdown?

Citation please.

of course, you also offered a million bucks to anyone who could prove it happens (you lied about that btw) and are full of crapola.
Click to expand...

A video of building being destroyed by controlled demolition doesn't comply with the rules in post #1. I need more details of structure + drop of top C on bottom A by gravity + analysis of broken parts, to verify that only gravity forces initiated by the drop broke 70% of the elements/connections.

It is correct that I offered $1M (not bucks) to one, not anyone, prospective challenger but she/he (Japanese) didn't accept the offer. If you are Japanese, I'll extend the offer to you too. If you are not Japanese, pls tell me what you are, and I may include you too, but only you, in the $1M selected ones. Get working on the structure you intend to enter in The Heiwa Challenge!
 
heiwa said:
a video of building being destroyed by controlled demolition doesn't comply with the rules in post #1. I need more details of structure + drop of top c on bottom a by gravity + analysis of broken parts, to verify that only gravity forces initiated by the drop broke 70% of the elements/connections.

It is correct that i offered $1m (not bucks) to one, not anyone, prospective challenger but she/he (japanese) didn't accept the offer. If you are japanese, i'll extend the offer to you too. If you are not japanese, pls tell me what you are, and i may include you too, but only you, in the $1m selected ones. Get working on the structure you intend to enter in the heiwa challenge!
Click to expand...
lies!
 
Heiwa, you fraud, you offered, in this thread, a million dollars to anyone who could disprove your retarded axiom. Someone who beat your moronic challenge would also disprove your stupid axiom. You are a liar and a fraud.
 
Heiwa said:
A video of building being destroyed by controlled demolition doesn't comply with the rules in post #1. I need more details of structure + drop of top C on bottom A by gravity + analysis of broken parts, to verify that only gravity forces initiated by the drop broke 70% of the elements/connections.

It is correct that I offered $1M (not bucks) to one, not anyone, prospective challenger but she/he (Japanese) didn't accept the offer. If you are Japanese, I'll extend the offer to you too. If you are not Japanese, pls tell me what you are, and I may include you too, but only you, in the $1M selected ones. Get working on the structure you intend to enter in The Heiwa Challenge!
Click to expand...

A video of a demoliton of a KNOWN building with a KNOWN location is perfectly acceptable.

There is NOTHING in your (stupid) rules which state it is NOT acceptable.

So shift shift shift yet again twoof.

so it doesn't violate any of the 10 rules posted. Thank you for playing twoofie.
 
Heiwa,

I'm mostly a lurker and a humble mental health clinician and even I can see that your hypothesis has been completely disproven here.

I'd also like to point out that your "challenge" is seriously flawed. You are the only judge of whether the criteria of the challenge have been met, but you also have a vested financial and political interest in seeing that nobody wins. This is a conflict of interests. You and the JREF forum posters need to collaborate in choosing judges that are unbiased and acceptable to all participants.

Furthermore the prize money should be placed in that hands of a legal firm who can insure that it is payed out to whoever wins the challenge (per the judge's verdict).

The fact that you have not established these mechanisms brings the legitimacy of your challenge into serious question.
 
Last edited:
The Lone Bolt said:
Heiwa,

I'm mostly a lurker and a humble mental health clinician and even I can see that your hypothesis has been completely disproven here.

I'd also like to point out that your "challenge" is seriously flawed. You are the only judge of whether the criteria of the challenge have been met, but you also have a vested financial and political interest in seeing that nobody wins. This is a conflict of interests. You and the JREF forum posters need to collaborate in choosing judges that are unbiased and acceptable to all participants.

Furthermore the prize money should be placed in that hands of a legal firm who can insure that it is payed out to whoever wins the challenge (per the judge's verdict).

The fact that you have not established these mechanisms brings the legitimacy of your challenge into serious question.
Click to expand...

Thanks for comments. There's no prize money in The Heiwa Challenge - see post #1. One selected, potential challenger has been offered monetary encouragement, though, but failed to provide a structure ++.

Of course I have initiated The Heiwa Challenge but the judges are the JREF members incl. you! So far nobody has been able to present a structure where top C one-way crushes bottom A.

Reason is, of course, that it is impossible, but, and that's the problem, it was possible according to GWB, Condi, FBI, FEMA, NIST ... and Mackey ... on 911.

So how did they do it on 911 and why can't anybody reproduce the phenomenon afterwards? I have asked all concerned and they are not able to produce any structure that meets rules in post #1 of The Heiwa Challenge!

It says all, don't you agree?
 
Heiwa said:
Thanks for comments. There's no prize money in The Heiwa Challenge - see post #1. One selected, potential challenger has been offered monetary encouragement, though, but failed to provide a structure ++.

Of course I have initiated The Heiwa Challenge but the judges are the JREF members incl. you!
Click to expand...

This is clearly untrue, as many on this very thread have judged the criteria of your challenge to have been met and you have rejected their opinions, therefore you are the sole judge in this matter.

If the posters here are the judges, then you must abide by their opinions regardless of your own.

But I can see that the $1,000,000 prize money was not an official condition of the "challenge" so I retract that claim.
 
The Lone Bolt said:
This is clearly untrue, as many on this very thread have judged the criteria of your challenge to have been met and you have rejected their opinions, therefore you are the sole judge in this matter.

If the posters here are the judges, then you must abide by their opinions regardless of your own.
Click to expand...

So far as I am concerned no structure has been presented that is destroyed as per rules of post #1. Or did I miss it? Plenty of pictures of cats presented by the judges ... but no structures.
 
Flawed challenge Heiwa. That's all you've ever had with this thread.
 
Last edited:
Heiwa said:
A video of building being destroyed by controlled demolition doesn't comply with the rules in post #1. I need more details of structure + drop of top C on bottom A by gravity + analysis of broken parts, to verify that only gravity forces initiated by the drop broke 70% of the elements/connections.

It is correct that I offered $1M (not bucks) to one, not anyone, prospective challenger but she/he (Japanese) didn't accept the offer. If you are Japanese, I'll extend the offer to you too. If you are not Japanese, pls tell me what you are, and I may include you too, but only you, in the $1M selected ones. Get working on the structure you intend to enter in The Heiwa Challenge!
Click to expand...

OK, what will your excuse be this time?


Here's another fine example:



Where's my one million twoofer bucks?
 
You know what, I think that I have figured out what Heiwa's weasel wording of "$1M (not bucks)" means. M is one thousand in roman numerals so he means one thousand dollars. Several countries use the $ sign so he might mean Hong Kong Dollars (he is in Asia right?) which is (at current exchange rates) $129.03 USD. Other countries also use the $ sign whose exchange rates are much worse than the HKD.

Heiwa, am I correct in my assumptions or did you mean that you would pay out one million dollars USD? No answer to this question by you means that you never intended to pay out $1 million in USD and that you are a fraud.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom