• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

The Heiwa Challenge

Status
Not open for further replies.
I see the cables too. But then again, I'm a disinfo agent sent here just to mess with bill.
 
bill smith said:
If it was only bolted to the top of the blue construction the forces at the point of contact must ave been enormoous when the wind blew what with a 30-story lever acting directly on the connection.The cabling was visibly not viable. Any force would hve been downwards at an angle. The blue thing ddidn't look like it was designed to deal with that direction of force and it wasn't that strong as you say yourself..
Click to expand...

Yes, the mast was like a flag pole. Not very heavy. The vertical load could easily be transmitted downwards by structure below. Transverse wind loads?
They produce a bending moment at the bottom, blue platform. Which is transmitted via the hat truss frames to the core and perimeter columns as shear forces/moments.
But on 911 there was no wind load. But suddenly, the mast dropped ... before ... anything else happened to the tower! Very strange!

With all these supports below and around - why would the mast drop BEFORE the roof line started to drop and BEFORE any visible structure below was destroyed? ????

Answer, CD! To destroy WTC 1 you had to soften the structure everywhere before blowing it down from top to bottom and the criminals blow off the mast supports a little too early. Of course, they had planned the crime for years before and in every detail ... but they messed up. The mast went down too early! Another smoking gun ... among many others.

One problem! These criminals are armed to the teeth with guns not yet smoking. Beware.
 
I see the cables too and cannot for the life of me figure out where Bill is going with this.

Bill, where are you going with this ?
 
So then I suppose I have to accept that the antenna was bolted to the top of the Three-floor hat truss which was built around and welded to the core columns. The antenna had cables supporting it . Have I got that right now ?
 
Last edited:
Edited by Tricky: 
Rule 12 violation removed.

Please refrain from posts that are nothing but personal attacks.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Tricky
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Heiwa said:
Yes, the mast was like a flag pole. Not very heavy. The vertical load could easily be transmitted downwards by structure below. Transverse wind loads?
They produce a bending moment at the bottom, blue platform. Which is transmitted via the hat truss frames to the core and perimeter columns as shear forces/moments.
But on 911 there was no wind load. But suddenly, the mast dropped ... before ... anything else happened to the tower! Very strange!

With all these supports below and around - why would the mast drop BEFORE the roof line started to drop and BEFORE any visible structure below was destroyed? ????

Answer, CD! To destroy WTC 1 you had to soften the structure everywhere before blowing it down from top to bottom and the criminals blow off the mast supports a little too early. Of course, they had planned the crime for years before and in every detail ... but they messed up. The mast went down too early! Another smoking gun ... among many others.

One problem! These criminals are armed to the teeth with guns not yet smoking. Beware.
Click to expand...
It is very strange because for the antenna to move downwards the hat truss had to be gone, or at least the part of it that the antenna sat on. It can't have been the whole hat truss that moved down because then the roofline and walls would have gone out of shape.
 
Last edited:
bill, if you had an sense of shame you would stop acting as if you know what you're talking about because it is glaringly obvious that you don't. But, by all means continue, I find it funny.
 
dtugg said:
bill, if you had an sense of shame you would stop acting as if you know what you're talking about because it is glaringly obvious that you don't. But, by all means continue, I find it funny.
Click to expand...

Just put some money in the hat on your way out. lol
 
stateofgrace said:
I see the cables too and cannot for the life of me figure out where Bill is going with this.

Bill, where are you going with this ?
Click to expand...

Bill is predictable. It has been obvious where he has been going with this. He just cant spit it out just yet because he thinks he has us all on a hook and feeding hiw dillusion. He anticipates that he is soon to hit us with his 'smoking gun' or some other conclusion that shows an inside job.:rolleyes:

Bill is itching to point out to us all that because we have all agreed that the antena was securely fitted to the top then as it fell we should see the antena popping or pushing off - you know, pushed away by the core collums as it dropped.

I assume that is what you have been attempting to get at Bill. Predictable Bill the smiling assassin who misses his target.
 
Heiwa said:
With all these supports below and around - why would the mast drop BEFORE the roof line started to drop and BEFORE any visible structure below was destroyed? ????

Answer, CD! To destroy WTC 1 you had to soften the structure everywhere before blowing it down from top to bottom and the criminals blow off the mast supports a little too early. Of course, they had planned the crime for years before and in every detail ... but they messed up. The mast went down too early! Another smoking gun ... among many others.
Click to expand...
Yeah, and you’re a NWO disinfo agent because you used five question marks instead of three.
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
It is very strange because for the antenna to move downwards the hat truss had to be gone, or at least the part of it that the antenna sat on. It can't have been the whole hat truss that moved down because then the roofline and walls would have gone out of shape.
Click to expand...

Something like that! But a moment later the whole upper part C is blown apart ... and still lower part A is intact. Gravity at work?

Sorry, this is Off Topic! The Heiwa Challenge is a friendly and lively way to discuss something else. See post #1.
 
Heiwa said:
Something like that! But a moment later the whole upper part C is blown apart ... and still lower part A is intact. Gravity at work?

Sorry, this is Off Topic! The Heiwa Challenge is a friendly and lively way to discuss something else. See post #1.
Click to expand...

*snort*

The whole section is blown apart in the centre of New York, on live TV and nobody notices, apart from you after watching a youtube video.

Yep I can see why everybody takes you seriously.:rolleyes:
 
Heiwa said:
With all these supports below and around - why would the mast drop BEFORE the roof line started to drop and BEFORE any visible structure below was destroyed? ????

.
Click to expand...

BEFORE??????

So the mast began to drop BEFORE the aircraft hit. Before any damage???? Some engineer and engineers mate you are:rolleyes:

Just a theory Heiwa/Bill - Perhaps the integrity of the structure below was visibly destroyed by a commercial aircraft.

Perhaps the resulting fires weakened the structure further, including the majic hat that did/did not support the antenna.

Perhaps the weight of the now weakened majic hat aided in destroying/displacing the core colums as it dropped.

Perhaps the shape and weight of the upper structure wedged perfectly in the centre of the weakened core columns and fell that way all the way, displacing the columns outwards all the way down.

Perhaps the lateral movement shreaded the thin concrete floors one by one, resulting in the latteral displacement of all that cracked/mushed concrete and side walls.

Just a theory Heiwa/Bill:rolleyes:
 
The Heiwa theory

1.Preplant explosives in landmark building without being noticed.
2.Fly planes into landmark building, ensuring they completely miss the explosives.
3.Let buildings burn for some time.
4.Start collapse by igniting preplanted explosives.
5.Blow up the entire upper section of building and hope nobody notices.
6.Blow up rest of building from the top down and hope nobody notices.
7.Make sure it is all broadcast live.

“Brilliant, approved, when does the next black op begin?”
 
stateofgrace said:
The Heiwa theory

1.Preplant explosives in landmark building without being noticed.
2.Fly planes into landmark building, ensuring they completely miss the explosives.
3.Let buildings burn for some time.
4.Start collapse by igniting preplanted explosives.
5.Blow up the entire upper section of building and hope nobody notices.
6.Blow up rest of building from the top down and hope nobody notices.
7.Make sure it is all broadcast live.

[FONT=Verdana[B]]“Brilliant, approved, when does the next black op begin?”[/B][/FONT]
Click to expand...

Next door needs the same -get right to it
 
IMPORTANT: Make sure some of the building falls on WTC 7 so we have plausible deniability when we demolish that building too. Lets not forget why we're here folks, this is all so we can make those pesky corporate lawsuits go away. WTC 7 is the real target.
 
Heiwa said:
Yes, the mast was like a flag pole. Not very heavy. The vertical load could easily be transmitted downwards by structure below. Transverse wind loads?
They produce a bending moment at the bottom, blue platform. Which is transmitted via the hat truss frames to the core and perimeter columns as shear forces/moments.
But on 911 there was no wind load. But suddenly, the mast dropped ... before ... anything else happened to the tower! Very strange!

With all these supports below and around - why would the mast drop BEFORE the roof line started to drop and BEFORE any visible structure below was destroyed? ????

Answer, CD! To destroy WTC 1 you had to soften the structure everywhere before blowing it down from top to bottom and the criminals blow off the mast supports a little too early. Of course, they had planned the crime for years before and in every detail ... but they messed up. The mast went down too early! Another smoking gun ... among many others.

One problem! These criminals are armed to the teeth with guns not yet smoking. Beware.
Click to expand...


Yes, Heiwa, "they" planned for years the idiotic nonsense you babble mindlessly about, "they" being members of the Clinton administration. Maybe they were religious fundamentalists, or neocons? Few self-absorbed, wrong-headed fools have ever been as thoroughly discredited as you have been.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom