• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

The Heiwa Challenge

Status
Not open for further replies.
So far 20 replies and none close to manage the challenge. So it seems crushing a structure with a piece of it, is not possible. NIST is therefore wrong!
 
Heiwa said:
So far 20 replies and none close to manage the challenge. So it seems crushing a structure with a piece of it, is not possible. NIST is therefore wrong!
Click to expand...

Everyone is fed up with your pathetic trolling, silly games and lies. You're a no planer, and as such are not worth the time.
 
Heiwa said:
So far 20 replies and none close to manage the challenge. So it seems crushing a structure with a piece of it, is not possible. NIST is therefore wrong!
Click to expand...

I wasn't aware that the JREF Forum carried such scientific weight. :rolleyes:
 
Heiwa said:
Silly excuses! Come on, you are challenged :)
Click to expand...

I have a rule for myself: I don't debate with people who deny it is bright day at noon. What you think about 9/11 is as outrageous as Holocaust denying (1).

It's odd that if we refuse to do your nonsense, you consider that we failed. It reminds me a conspiracist's dogma you seem to agree with: "If A can't prove B is wrong, this proves implicitely that A is wrong". Which is an incorrect claim.

As Shadowdweller pointed, you haven't any clue about scale effect. As you don't understand the most basic things of Physics, why should we answer your challenge?




(1) Godwin!
 
Last edited:
I think it's fair to say that if nobody of all the thousands of jref members, vested interests and concerned citizens yhat are no doubt reading this page accept Heiwa's challenge within, say 20 days that Heiwa can be said to have successfully debunked he government story and that another and independent 9/11 enquiry is urgently and immediately called for.
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
I think it's fair to say that if nobody of all the thousands of jref members, vested interests and concerned citizens yhat are no doubt reading this page accept Heiwa's challenge within, say 20 days that Heiwa can be said to have successfully debunked he government story and that another and independent 9/11 enquiry is urgently and immediately called for.
Click to expand...

Why yes. Of course it does, bill. Of course it does. Frankly, the only thing the thousands of JREF members, vested interests and concerned citizens reading this page are thinking is that there's special place reserved in the Pantheon of Stupid for no planers.
 
RedIbis said:
I've been through quite a lot of it. Please point me to specifically where the complete separation is explained.
Click to expand...

Not until you have read it all.

Its quite a simple concept really. Watch the videos, you see it happening.
 
twinstead said:
Why yes. Of course it does, bill. Of course it does. Frankly, the only thing the thousands of JREF members, vested interests and concerned citizens reading this page are thinking is that there's special place reserved in the Pantheon of Stupid for no planers.
Click to expand...

Well they have 20 days to prove it. Can't say fairer than that.
 
bill smith said:
I think it's fair to say that if nobody of all the thousands of jref members, vested interests and concerned citizens yhat are no doubt reading this page accept Heiwa's challenge within, say 20 days that Heiwa can be said to have successfuly debunked he government story and that another and independent 9/11 enquiry is urgently and immediately called for.
Click to expand...

Or that nobody feels that they need to go out of their way to do a Heiwa challenge. He is a known liar and is responsible for some of the stupidest crap I have ever heard. Literally, ever. Even if the challenge was satisfied he would pretend like it didn't happen.

The Heiwa Challenge is completely stupid and meaningless anyway. One would need to make sure the structure is properly scaled in regards to strength for the results to mean anything. Heiwa, who is supposedly an engineer does not understand this. Building a model of a structure as large as the towers that are scaled properly to strength would be extremely difficult if not impossible. Nobody is going to attempt to do it to satisfy some loon.
 
Heiwa said:
See post #1 above.

BTW I'll pay you $1M if you can produce a structure that can be crushed like that. Suteki desu ne!? Get working!
Click to expand...

Prove you have a million dollars. I think you are a liar and don't have the money at all.
 
bill smith said:
Well they have 20 days to prove it. Can't say fairer than that.
Click to expand...

How about this timeline Bill. Prove that there is a million dollars within 24 hours or the mods will be notified that you and Heiwa are running a scam on the members and should be banned.
 
dtugg said:
Or that nobody feels that they need to go out of their way to do a Heiwa challenge. He is a known liar and is responsible for some of the stupidest crap I have ever heard. Literally, ever. Even if the challenge was satisfied he would pretend like it didn't happen.

The Heiwa Challenge is completely stupid and meaningless anyway. One would need to make sure the structure is properly scaled in regards to strength for the results to mean anything. Heiwa, who is supposedly an engineer does not understand this. Building a model of a structure as large as the towers that are scaled properly to strength would be extremely difficult if not impossible. Nobody is going to attempt to do it to satisfy some loon.
Click to expand...

Heiwa has an international reputation in the field of structural damage analysis. He is therefore very well placed to make this Challenge. Furthermore he is offering an extremely attractive incentive for somebody to help the government out by proving him wrong. We are talking a not-so-small fortune here Dtugg. If nobody will accept the Challenge under conditions like these we abslutely know with 100% certainty that nobody can do it.Therefore the official account is not true and a new and independent 9/11 enquiry is an urgent neccessity. An immediate neccessity.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom