Again, I'd like to see some
primary evidence that a person you're calling a leftist is a leftist.
I'm unfamiliar with Lizza myself, so it's possible Lizza is indeed a leftist. But since you didn't provide any evidence of that, and you've made at least oner previous unsupported claim which appears to be mistaken, I'd like to see some actual evidence to support the assertion that Lizza is a leftist.
A quick Google turns up a number of echo-chamber sites claiming that, but I don't see any reputable or reliable source for that claim. In particular, I don't see Lizza himself saying it and I don't see any leftists saying it. But in doing quick Google searches on
"Ryan Lizza" Democrat, and
"Ryan Lizza" liberal, and
"Ryan Lizza" progressive, while I didn't turn up any primary evidence supporting the claim that Lizza is a liberal, I did notice that shortly after the recent news about Lizza broke, someone edited the Wikipedia entry for Lizza to add the term
progressive to the opening-paragraph description of Lizza. That was then edited out a day later, on the ground that nothing in the article says that and no citation to support it had been provided. We'll see if any evidence is supplied; but it looks to me like this is an echo-chamber claim rather than something people spreading it actually have direct knowledge of.
Wikipedia indicates that Lizza is a journalist and political analyst who is best known for his work for CNN and the
New Yorker, but also known for work with and contributions to
The Atlantic, New York magazine, the
New York Times -- and for being a senior editor at
The New Republic from 1998 to 2007.
Working for CNN, the
New Yorker,
The Atlantic, New York magazine and the
New York Times doesn't really give us much of a clue to Lizza's politics. All of those are mainstream media and hire people from the left and the right. But working for
The New Republic during those years, especially in a senior editor position, does give us a strong clue. It indicates Lizza is probably
not a leftist.
For those not familiar with
The New Republic, here's some history. Founded by members of the Progressive movement back in 1914,
The New Republic was for many decades one of the leading liberal magazines, read by and respected by many on the left. But that changed in the late 1970s, when Michael Kinsley took over editorship and changed it into a "neoliberal" (equals rightist rather than leftist) magazine. During the 80s, they supported Reagan's policies; during the '90s, they supported efforts to move the Democratic Party rightward; during the early '00s they supported George W. Bush's policies. Prominent writers for the magazine included Charles Krautheimer and Fred Barnes -- who are definitely not "leftists".
In recent years the magazine tried to move back toward the left. A few years ago they offered me a low-cost subscription ($10 for a year) so I tried it again -- and found it still too center-right for my taste so did not re-subscribe when the year was up. I see they have now ceased publication, which doesn't surprise me.
It's helpful to keep in mind that while in the US the word
liberal is often seen as synonymous with
left-wing that's not always the case. It depends on whether one is referring to modern liberalism (which is left-wing) or classical liberalism (which is center-right). Neoliberals such as those running
The New Republic during its conservative period like to call themselves classical liberals, meaning they adhere to the ideals of Adam Smith and Thomas Hobbes. They strongly favor capitalism and small government -- which are on the right-leaning rather than left-leaning end of the political spectrum.
Lizza's involvement with
The New Republic during its neoliberal period strongly suggests he is not a leftist. But I'm not familiar with his writings or his television commentaries, so it's possible he actually is. What does the evidence say?
Could you provide a
primary source supporting your claim that Lizza is a leftist? Either
a direct statement from Lizza that he's a leftist, or
direct statements from prominent left-wing sites or from prominent left-wingers praising him as a leftist, would be good evidence in support of your claim.
If you can't provide either of those types of evidence, then you could instead try to show he's a leftist by providing examples of leftist opinions he's expressed and demonstrating that he is
consistently or at least
primarily leftist in the opinions he has expressed and positions he has supported. That calls for a lot more work on your part, though.