The Great Coverup.

[Crazy Chainsaw]

Never say die, my brother. You might win, you might lose, but as my spirit animal Winnie Churchill said, Never Never Never Give Up.

They have wanted me dead since 2008, now I am waiting for that last shoe to fall, my name Litterally means fierce Warrior, I never intend on surrendering peaceful to anything when my day does come, I intend to spit in deaths face.
I just hope before that day many years from now is upon me, I will see Accountability restored to our nation and stupidity cast out from the minds of Humanity.
I just hope the normal life span of my Family, late 90s to early hundreds will give me enough time.

 

[Thermal]

They have wanted me dead since 2008, now I am waiting for that last shoe to fall, my name Litterally means fierce Warrior, I never intend on surrendering peaceful to anything when my day does come, I intend to spit in deaths face.
I just hope before that day many years from now is upon me, I will see Accountability restored to our nation and stupidity cast out from the minds of Humanity.
I just hope the normal life span of my Family, late 90s to early hundreds will give me enough time.

And on that note, imma back slowly away from the thread. Vaya con Dios.

 

[Crazy Chainsaw]

And on that note, imma back slowly away from the thread. Vaya con Dios.

Have a Beautiful weekend.

 

[Thermal]

Have a Beautiful weekend.

Back atcha babe

 

[Mike!]

You should just make it open public knowledge that you're Crazy, you have several Chainsaws, and you know how to use them in a very creative fashion.
Anyone gives you any grief, just smile and ask, "Do you know who 'Leatherface' is?"

 

[Thermal]

How do they hurt my Arguments because I told Corsi he was F***Ed if he went ahead with the story of the United States Navy Firing a Cruise Missle into the Pentagon based on what Lytlte Tripp told him?

Here is the article he wrote instead,, sorry I was wrong it happened right after mine and Corsi's Email conversation.

The Email Screen shot,
https://photos.app.goo.gl/DFmArKmi49jncbod8

https://www.wnd.com/2008/02/57680/

I know I'm going to regret asking this, but...

The "email screenshot" you posted here was not an email screenshot. You just typed it up. The leading line says "Here is My 2008 Email to Corsi." The rest of the text follows in the same font, with the totally random capitalizations in Corsis reply that you use when posting. Also, you forgot to leave a space between 'Sanders' and 'saw' in the second email heading, that was there in the first.

So it's not a screenshot of an email exchange. It's just something you typed up.

 

[junkshop]

In summary, then, the evidence presented so far is:

• A whole bunch of irrelevant links

• A meandering string of onion-stories that would make a Breton blush, and

• Some faked email screenshots

Colour me convinced.

 

[theprestige]

I considered pointing out earlier that screenshots of emails don't count as evidence for me, because they have no verifiable chain of custody and are too easy to mock up. Photos can be manipulated (or just outright stolen from the Internet). There's even apps for creating fake text conversations.

I decided not to bother, since there seems to be little point in debating with someone who lacks the presence of mind to realize how non-compelling screenshots of emails are.

I am a little surprised that CC managed to mess up even that trivial task.

 

[Thermal]

I considered pointing out earlier that screenshots of emails don't count as evidence for me, because they have no verifiable chain of custody and are too easy to mock up. Photos can be manipulated (or just outright stolen from the Internet). There's even apps for creating fake text conversations.

I decided not to bother, since there seems to be little point in debating with someone who lacks the presence of mind to realize how non-compelling screenshots of emails are.

I am a little surprised that CC managed to mess up even that trivial task.

Considering the relatively low stakes here, and giving a fellow non-hostile member the benefit of the doubt, a screenshot would provisionally be ok? Maybe not in a trial, sure. But I think our intrepid forumite is not trying to fool... you know... us. I think he's kidding himself, and is desperate to show something, anything, to bolster his credibility when his hands are empty.

 

[GlennB]

^ Sums it up nicely.

 

[Crazy Chainsaw]

I know I'm going to regret asking this, but...

The "email screenshot" you posted here was not an email screenshot. You just typed it up. The leading line says "Here is My 2008 Email to Corsi." The rest of the text follows in the same font, with the totally random capitalizations in Corsis reply that you use when posting. Also, you forgot to leave a space between 'Sanders' and 'saw' in the second email heading, that was there in the first.

So it's not a screenshot of an email exchange. It's just something you typed up.

Actually I pasted it from a backup CD that contained the actual email text without altering the text.placing that Line denoting the paste.
I did that because the CD was in a device that didn't allow screen capture.

 

[Crazy Chainsaw]

I considered pointing out earlier that screenshots of emails don't count as evidence for me, because they have no verifiable chain of custody and are too easy to mock up. Photos can be manipulated (or just outright stolen from the Internet). There's even apps for creating fake text conversations.

I decided not to bother, since there seems to be little point in debating with someone who lacks the presence of mind to realize how non-compelling screenshots of emails are.

I am a little surprised that CC managed to mess up even that trivial task.

Yet I have to original Emails still on the Original hard drive with full chain of Custody.

 

[GlennB]

Actually I pasted it from a backup CD that contained the actual email text without altering the text.placing that Line denoting the paste.
I did that because the CD was in a device that didn't allow screen capture.

Why does it contain random and inappropriate capitalisations exactly like your posts here? Everybody and their dog knows you faked that 'email', so you're fooling nobody but yourself.

 

[Crazy Chainsaw]

Why does it contain random and inappropriate capitalisations exactly like your posts here? Everybody and their dog knows you faked that 'email', so you're fooling nobody but yourself.

Let's look at the time line,

December 2007, The Email Debate between Dr. Steven Earl Jones and Dr. Frank R. greening takes place on Jref, Jones Microspheres are shown to be common Fly Ash.

January 29th Corsi goes on too Alex Jones's Infowars Radio Program and declared he worked a Year and has Earth shaking Evidence the Towers were Controlled Demolition.

RTV, calls me in the morning, of Feb. 27th 2008, and Induces Me to Speak to Corsi, and I debunk his year of Work, with one photo.

February 29th Corsi published the story, in World Net Daily debunking the 9/11 no planer Claims that he Made in the inforwars Program using the F4 Phantom Video I sent to him. No longer even Talking about the Microspheres he said were so Important.

As far as the Capitolization I don’t know, he did underline some words in the Emails and it doesn't show them underlined either, I was thinking that was the original Email perhaps it is a copy of a forum post where I recreated the email on physorg, or the 9/11Forum. I would have to get the old EMachine out of the attic to find out. Or perhaps Corsi just Typed it that way.

The fact is the Debunking of Jones's Microspheres was done on this very forum in December 2007. By showing Jones's data was nothing more than finding Fly ash particles, proved By Doctor Greening.

https://photos.app.goo.gl/vpRMowc15W3VXheF9

You can accuse me of Faking the old Jref thread if you want now, the search function on the forum doesn't work well for me, of I would pull up the thread on the Microspheres debate for you.

 

[Crazy Chainsaw]

Why does it contain random and inappropriate capitalisations exactly like your posts here? Everybody and their dog knows you faked that 'email', so you're fooling nobody but yourself.

Also this is the picture from Walter McCrone's Particle Atlas that Dr. Greening Emailed to me and Dr, Steven Earl Jones, I also think I sent Corsi on February
27th the Email from Steven where he Admitted his Microspheres were Fly Ash.

https://photos.app.goo.gl/evaMj7aeduqUt7TJA

 

[Thermal]

Also a this is the picture from Walter McCrone's Particle Atlas that Dr. Greening Emailed to me and Dr, Steven Earl Jones, I also think I sent Corsi on February
27th the Email from Steven where he Admitted his Microspheres were Fly Ash.

https://photos.app.goo.gl/evaMj7aeduqUt7TJA

Dude. My brother. No one is asking you about timelines or reposting the same borrowed graph over and over.

What we are trying to determine is how reliable your accounting is, before we get to all that. What you are demonstrating is that your accounting is not reliable. You say you post a screen shot of the email. You do not post a screen shot, but post a typed recollection. When questioned on y u do dis, you acknowledge that you in fact have no screen shot, nor even the ability to get one.

Also, Corsi's "reply", as short as it is, is borderline illiterate, containing broken grammar that would make a first semester ESL student blush. Butchered, broken grammar, psycho punctuation and lack thereof, and random capitalization. Corsi is a Harvard PhD, published author, and intellectual snob; I am confident that he would not compose even a brief email on the writing level of a beheaded chicken.

Nothing about your screenshot is remotely credible, and you changing the subject when questioned about it is not helping matters.

 

[Crazy Chainsaw]

Dude. My brother. No one is asking you about timelines or reposting the same borrowed graph over and over.

What we are trying to determine is how reliable your accounting is, before we get to all that. What you are demonstrating is that your accounting is not reliable. You say you post a screen shot of the email. You do not post a screen shot, but post a typed recollection. When questioned on y u do dis, you acknowledge that you in fact have no screen shot, nor even the ability to get one.

Also, Corsi's "reply", as short as it is, is borderline illiterate, containing broken grammar that would make a first semester ESL student blush. Butchered, broken grammar, psycho punctuation and lack thereof, and random capitalization. Corsi is a Harvard PhD, published author, and intellectual snob; I am confident that he would not compose even a brief email on the writing level of a beheaded chicken.

Nothing about your screenshot is remotely credible, and you changing the subject when questioned about it is not helping matters.

Corsi was terrified, he just spent a year working on a project, that he borrowed money on, and knew he wasn't going to make a dime, he wasn't Proof reading what he wrote at the time.

In the Video Alex asks Corsi, if he worked a Year on the Story, and book, Corsi
Says yes.

If you think his Grammar was bad there I wish I had the part of the Email and his Comments about Steven Jones being an MFing Liar who Conned him. Corsi's own words.
Corsi was coming unhinged and I felt sorry for him, that's why I sent him the F4 Phantom link, that's the only reason I did that.

And since I still have all the Picutres and Links clearly, why wouldn't I make a perfect fake if I were trying to fake it?

I could have made a perfect fake, easy, instead I made a mistake because I thought I found a snippet of the Original Email on an old CD.

Also as I said the Hard drive with the original Emails still exists.

 

[Crazy Chainsaw]

Dude. My brother. No one is asking you about timelines or reposting the same borrowed graph over and over.

What we are trying to determine is how reliable your accounting is, before we get to all that. What you are demonstrating is that your accounting is not reliable. You say you post a screen shot of the email. You do not post a screen shot, but post a typed recollection. When questioned on y u do dis, you acknowledge that you in fact have no screen shot, nor even the ability to get one.

Also, Corsi's "reply", as short as it is, is borderline illiterate, containing broken grammar that would make a first semester ESL student blush. Butchered, broken grammar, psycho punctuation and lack thereof, and random capitalization. Corsi is a Harvard PhD, published author, and intellectual snob; I am confident that he would not compose even a brief email on the writing level of a beheaded chicken.

Nothing about your screenshot is remotely credible, and you changing the subject when questioned about it is not helping matters.

Can we agree on these facts based on the Timelines

1 Dr. Steven Earl Jones's Microspheres were debunked in December 2007, by Dr. Frank R Greening, in an Email Debate between Frank and Steven that I was Involved in.

2 in January Jerome Corsi, went on Alex Jones's show, and Said he was Publishing a story in World Net Daily, about Dr. STEVEN EARL JONES microspheres.

3 Corsi Dropped the Story About the Microspheres, published instead a Story about an F4 Phantom on a Rocket Sled.

Can we atleast agree on those facts?
Now ask yourself how Corsi found out Frank had Debunked Steven, in time to drop the Microspheres story, and Publish the F4 Phantom story?

 

[Thermal]

Can we agree on these facts based on the Timelines

1 Dr. Steven Earl Jones's Microspheres were debunked in December 2007, by Dr. Frank R Greening, in an Email Debate between Frank and Steven that I was Involved in.

2 in January Jerome Corsi, went on Alex Jones's show, and Said he was Publishing a story in World Net Daily, about Dr. STEVEN EARL JONES microspheres.

3 Corsi Dropped the Story About the Microspheres, published instead a Story about an F4 Phantom on a Rocket Sled.

Can we atleast agree on those facts?
Now ask yourself how Corsi found out Frank had Debunked Steven, in time to drop the Microspheres story, and Publish the F4 Phantom story?

I do not care in the slightest about those things. They are correlations without causation. You have no idea why they happened in that order, but rely on your conspiracy theory and a smattering of mind reading to explain them. That does not interest me. And you're changing the subject again.

The subject is (and I'm not sure why we are stuck on this) I'd that you claimed to debunk Corsi in a private email exchange, which is not only not evidenced, but is evidenced to not have happened. If your retyping of the email is 100% accurate, and I'm willing to give you the benefit of the doubt on that point, then it sounds like Corsi was ridiculing you, and you are taking it literally.

Just for a laugh, assume your retype email is accurate, and read his brief reply as sarcasm. That kind of changes your whole interpretation, no?

Eta: regarding your "facts":

#1) I have no idea if this is factual or not.

#2) Dont know and don't care if this happened or not.

#3) No idea why he chose to publish what. Could easily have been for reasons you are utterly unaware of.

Again, you are changing the subject when challenged. That's not clean pool. We need to resolve the Corsi email thing first, to help restore your credibility. Then we can move on.

 

[Crazy Chainsaw]

I do not care in the slightest about those things. They are correlations without causation. You have no idea why they happened in that order, but rely on your conspiracy theory and a smattering of mind reading to explain them. That does not interest me. And you're changing the subject again.

The subject is (and I'm not sure why we are stuck on this) I'd that you claimed to debunk Corsi in a private email exchange, which is not only not evidenced, but is evidenced to not have happened. If your retyping of the email is 100% accurate, and I'm willing to give you the benefit of the doubt on that point, then it sounds like Corsi was ridiculing you, and you are taking it literally.

Just for a laugh, assume your retype email is accurate, and read his brief reply as sarcasm. That kind of changes your whole interpretation, no?

Eta: regarding your "facts":

#1) I have no idea if this is factual or not.

#2) Dont know and don't care if this happened or not.

#3) No idea why he chose to publish what. Could easily have been for reasons you are utterly unaware of.

Again, you are changing the subject when challenged. That's not clean pool. We need to resolve the Corsi email thing first, to help restore your credibility. Then we can move on.

One does not Beg Someone to help him and Riticule them at the same time and Alex Jones, ask Corsi about his Years worth of work on his Story and Book, and 9/11Twoofers even know Corsi was working a Year since corsi was at the 9/11 memorial in 2006, selling his Minuteman book.

Everything is well documented much of it on this very forum.

1 is well known knowledge Recorded on this very forum, that you can find by a simple search. It's part of the history of jref.

2 I posted the Video made by a Member of this forum, and discussed on this very forum.

3LOL obviously Corsi wasn't going to Publish Jones work once Jones admitted Dr. Greening's-Appollo20's worked proved his microspheres matched common Fly Ash!


If you can't admit to well known facts, then there is no reason to continue this conversation and your points are debunked, for lack of knowledge on the Subject.