The Gospel

[Ducky]

That's pretty cute, eh? How about this one:

Yeah, that's even cuter. Then there's this one:

Yep. Or this one:

But this is my favorite:

Your move, chump.

 

[kmortis]

Fowl,
You really are losing your touch.

 

[Ducky]

Bah! Eat this, ace:

You just got served, bitch.

 

[kmortis]

Served? HAHAHAHA, you couldn't serve if Anna Kornakova showed you how

 

[Ducky]

Oh, points taken away for puppy dress up. That's just not right. And at least one of those isn't a puppy.

Try some of this:

Not a fan of greyhounds? ok try these:

If Irish Setter isn't your favorite, then there's these:

How's that spanking feel, biyatch?

 

[kmortis]

Puppy dress up is perfectly legal....in 29 states.

See?

 

[Ducky]

Excuse me, but trying to pass off a picture of your girlfriend as a dog dressed up is just mean toward your girlfriend.

Try these, you chump-ass:

 

[Ducky]

Some more for Kmortis:

I win, bitches.

 

[kmortis]

Well, beee-otch, here we are again.

And, don't ask me how I found it, but I found one of the pup leaving little bits of you all across the floor....

 

[Ducky]

OH! Penalty box! You repeated the red ball one. Sad.

You can't beat the Beagle in the bathtub, you loser.

Here's some more:

That last one is saying "Yo quero Kmortis' shoes to chew cause he sucks BIYATCH!"

One last one:

 

[kmortis]

Before I leave you in your own filth, I have one more for you.

 

[Ducky]

OOOH! 3 penalties for dress up and a penalty for repeating. You're racking it up.

Another few:

Suck an egg, you loathsome dork. I win.

 

[ceo_esq]

I'm not sure what you're going on about CEO_esq. Fine, the example of the last words of a mythical (in my mind) individual are perhaps not the best means of pointing out contradictions. So noted.

Not to carry on about it; I believe I've only ever referred to it in direct response to someone else's comments on the topic. I probably wouldn't bother bringing up the "last words" issue up on my own initiative, for reasons including the very good ones you mention in your post.

There are more substantive contradictions in the bible than those of some paltry last words.

I'd be the last one here to deny that.

These have been detailed by other posters in this thread. I don't see where Kathy has responded to these posted examples with anything other than repeated Alleluias.

I don't think she has substantively responded to any of those sorts of questions.

 

[Ducky]

Here, ceo_esq, a puppy for you:

 

[Genesius]

Sorry to interrupt the flow of puppies. Just call me a traditionalist.

 

[Ducky]

Heretic.

You will burn for this. Along with your damn kitties.

 

[Genesius]

Heretic.

You will burn for this. Along with your damn kitties.

Say that to my pet kitty, Mr. Cuddles.

Say hello to the nice man, Mr. Cuddles.

Awwwwww. Mr. Cuddles wants to play! Isn't that CUTE!

 

[Ducky]

Bring it on kitty, the world's ugliest dog cannot be killed. I shall sick him on you.

Right after he's done humping ceo_esq's leg.

 

[Genesius]

Bring it on kitty, the world's ugliest dog cannot be killed. I shall sick him on you.

Right after he's done humping ceo_esq's leg.

Eeewwww. I don't want dog sick on me.

Hmmm. . . I was going to go pedantic on you about "sick him on you" rather than "sic him on you", but dictionary.com tells me they're both acceptable. You learn something new every day.

 

[uruk]

PLEASE STOP!!!!! The cuteness is KILLING ME!!!!
AAAAAAHHHHHGGGGUUUUULLLLLLLL *erk* slobber

***SATAN WILL LEAVE THIS BODY FOR NOW, BUT KNOW THIS YOU WHO ARE ALL DAMNED!!! THE SOUL THAT POSSESSED THIS BODY WAS A SHRINER! YOU WERE ALL BETTER OFF WITH ME!!!!!!!****

*cough, cough* WOW! where was I? Glad that was over. Mable! get me my accordian I feel like Playing "Lady of Spain" all night tonight!