The Gospel

Genesius said:
Sorry to interrupt the flow of puppies. Just call me a traditionalist.
Click to expand...

All hail kittening!!!

427e712f682a3.jpg

42af480d51987.jpg

42b9ebc727227.jpg

4337f42225732.jpg

43cbb59ad62b3.jpg

42e8b33581cf3.jpg

428c8463e930e.jpg

43cbcd0005016.jpg

431094f11b552.jpg

43ce0e6af1427.jpg


All hail kittening!!!
 
Enough insufferable cuteness...I bring you Cthulhu

cthulhu.jpg


Oh, and a note to Ote. If you use an intermediary, like photobucket, then it gives you a chance to see if you get those kinds of errors before you look like a jerk.
 
Last edited:
ceo_esq
"Jesus' last words" isn't a proposition. Please be more explicit than that.
Click to expand...
Why bother, one has already been pointed out and you’ve so far managed to avoid it.
Are you claiming to have forgotten that you were going to look up what the sign above Jesus said?

Supporting evidence for what? I wasn't making an empirical claim, as in one requiring evidence. I didn't say "this is what the Gospel authors were describing" or "the events likely occurred in this particular order".
Click to expand...
Actually your entire premise is that the events likely occurred in this particular order, you added a bit more but that is the entire basis of your premise.

Ossai
 
kmortis said:
Enough insufferable cuteness...I bring you Cthulhu

cthulhu.jpg


Oh, and a note to Ote. If you use an intermediary, like photobucket, then it gives you a chance to see if you get those kinds of errors before you look like a jerk.
Click to expand...

Thanks. I was overzealous in my attempt to defend kittening.
 
Ossai said:
Why bother, one has already been pointed out and you’ve so far managed to avoid it.
Are you claiming to have forgotten that you were going to look up what the sign above Jesus said?
Click to expand...

I meant a proposition from the other set of passages, obviously. What does the one have to do with the other? And remember, the reason for which I was looking the other Gospel passages up was not to see whether they contained an inconsistency as such, but to see if delphi_ote's proposed resolution of the inconsistency (each author seeing part of the sign) was essentially the same kind of solution I identified for the "last words". I'm not sure that it is. I think the "Crucifixion sign" contradiction may be real rather than illusory.

Now, since you failed to identify any specific logical problem with the "last words" solution, can we drop this as bluess has sagely suggested? After all, I want to make sure all your legitimate questions are answered, but we have probably passed the "point of diminishing returns".


Ossai said:
[Actually your entire premise is that the events likely occurred in this particular order, you added a bit more but that is the entire basis of your premise.
Click to expand...

No. The idea was simply that if, hypothetically, events occurred in that order, then none of the source texts is explicitly contradicted. You will note that I expressly stated that I did not personally feel it was the most natural or most likely interpretation, and I do not particularly care whether Gospel events occurred in any order or no order at all. It was merely a solution to a little logical puzzle posed by another poster, if you will - not a solution to the question of what actually happened or how anyone ought to read the Gospels.
 
Last edited:
kmortis said:
Well, that's because kittening is indefensible. It's 2006, man, we've moved on from kittens, it's now puppies or Mythos.
Click to expand...

You damn kids with your long hair and baggy pants! What's next, home improvement tips instead of recipes?
 
Belz... said:
Damn! We've gotta form a kittening coalition, here!
Click to expand...
Everyone, IGNORE THE DEMON! He knows not what he says. No kittening colition is necessary, kittening is The Computer's Favorite; The Computer is your friend; if you like The Computer you will not kitten; if you kitten, The Computer will delete you.....
 
kmortis said:
Everyone, IGNORE THE DEMON! He knows not what he says. No kittening colition is necessary, kittening is The Computer's Favorite; The Computer is your friend; if you like The Computer you will not kitten; if you kitten, The Computer will delete you.....
Click to expand...


t_cute_004_116.jpg
 
Sorry, I'll have to taste his wrath when I get home - for some reason my PC at work won't show me a picture.

So tell me - does his wrath taste like chicken?
 
For the record, this is officially the most derailed thread ever. Can we keep derailing it by talking about how totally derailed it is?

ETA, something like this:
0616_348s.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom