• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

The Genesis Seal

Donn said:
Not the input text, but you are picking from what you discover via your 'seal'.

Speaking of picking, this reminds me of your entire approach:
Have you heard that elephants paint their toenails red so they can hide in cherry trees?
Have you ever seen an elephant in a cherry tree? No? Well, see how well it works!



General call:
Is there some way we can show Kingfisher that his Hebrew (i.e. not using English as we have) seal can yield less suggestive finds? Perhaps modern names, mundane nouns and other contemporary trivia would cause him to think twice.
Click to expand...

OK, let's give it a shot.

The G2 Square:

1. The grid arrangement yields shikkor, meaning "drunken," intersecting with the resh of B'reishit in the right hand corner. If called to interpret this phenomenon, I would venture that it is an admonishment not to engage in divining patterns in random arrangements of the text, lest one be gazed upon as if besotted.
2. Reading inward from the third square up on the left, we get yatom, meaning orphan; it crosses the words elohim, hayta and t'hom. That must mean God felt like an orphan in an abyss when He created existence. Also, yatom has a g'matriya of 456, which corresponds to v'timmeta (vav,tet,mem,aleph,tav), meaning, "you shall render impure."

Bottom line: cut it out.
 
Kingfisher2926 said:
The best I can do is to go over a few of my earlier points..
Click to expand...

no the best you could do is listen to what people in a discussion forum you are posting in are telling you and stop being a fundamentalist and stop lieing about history which doesn't support you
:rolleyes:
your earlier points have already been answered, they failed to impress, what is stopping you from listening to people ?
 
Last edited:
Kingfisher2926 said:
Some correspondents on this thread have asked my to present the whole picture. Now you and they will understand why is not possible.
Click to expand...
No, what I understand is that you're a very verbose writer. A good scientist can condence ten years of research into four pages (the page limit for any Science article). Here's a tip: cite references, rather than listing research that has already been done. Also, use figures rather than words. A picture's worth 1,000 words, minimum. And I don't just mean pictures of your code--I mean pictures of artifacts (books, carvings, paintings, etc) that somehow show that you're not the first to understand this.

Of all the stuff you've presented in this post, only one bit--the two Jewish myths--is even an attempt at what I suggested you focus on. And that's a very, very tenuous connection.

I've tried to help you, but you don't seem to be able to see this from any perspective other than your own. That's a serious problem in communicating anything to anyone. It will not work in this context. You must recognize that your audience has seen stuff that looks exactly like this, many times, and it's always turned out to be nothing more than the Law of Large Numbers and seeking meaning in the meaningless. Until you recognize that, and take steps to show that there's some reason to believe what you say beyond "But I found a word in this jumble!", you're going to be dismissed out of hand as just another example of someone who doesn't understand statistics.
 
Since Kingfisher is picking cherries, do you think I could feed them to the Genesis Sealion?
 
Kingfisher2926 said:
dafydd wrote:


Given that the Enuma Elish consists of around a thousand lines of text, your efforts can hardly be compared with the 64 letters of the Genesis Seal. Consider the ill-fated bible code based on about 20,000 words. In this matter, the extreme compactness of the Seal is everything.
Click to expand...

Wave arms much, does it help?
 
Donn said:
No. Get your own cherries. Anyway, the Genesis Sealion only eats shellfish. :D
Click to expand...
Just because that's all you feed them doesn't mean that's all they eat. They might like them. We might need to consult the Corn Doggies on this matter.
 
I consulted them, and they said "rut rut rut".
 
Marduk said:
you're already there, so another attempt on your part to lie your way out of an earlier unsupported claim
:rolleyes:



its the very definition of cherry picking, we already are aware kingfisher that the reason you haven't done it with the rest of Genesis is because it doesn't work as well. So your confirmation bias is now denying that you are cherry picking, doesn't matter, its not necessary for you to admit something for the rest of us to know its true, by comparison the bible code which works throughout the whole book is far superior. Maybe you need to read this,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cherry_picking_(fallacy)
because its clearly another logical fallacy that you don't understand
;)
Click to expand...

I think some frequency statistics from articles randomly chosen from hebrew news papers would be enough.

that way it the number of these magic words rise a standard deviation above that os teh control texts, we at least can say. yes there are words, at more than random.
 
As far as perfect numbers, I don't remember 24 being one one, seven is the number of spheres below the abyss so certainly not perfect. You have the three supernals and the seven lower spheres. But they are all perfect they are all aspects of god.

3, 6, 9 and ten maybe
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom