The Genesis Seal

[Marduk]

oops you appear to have missed the question I asked you
here it is again

so a question
Q. Show any character in history was aware of this with direct evidence (i.e. not your suspicions)

I will keep asking this question, if you refuse to answer, we will all know youre making it up

thats twice now, I hope you answer before we get into embaressing double figures, but I'm not holding my breath

 

[dafydd]

Dinwar,
I just crave a little patience. I will present the information as quickly as possible so that it can be discussed as a coherent whole.
Daffidd pointed out that what I am doing is not scholarship. Just bear in mind the the Klondike (sp?) goldrush was not started by a professional mining engineer, but by a guy out looking for his sister and her family.

Quite right, making things up is the phrase that comes to mind. There will be no Genesis Seal gold rush. You will entertain us for a while, then fade out of the picture. You are not the first visitor here with a silly idea based on confirmation bias. You said that you have been working on this for years, but you have no information?

 

[Kingfisher2926]

dafydd said:

No, you said undiscovered. Give us an example of it being discovered. Bet you can't.

I have promised to do so, but only when I have had (been given) a chance to present enough information.

 

[dafydd]

Kingfisher, what about this.?

Q. Show any character in history was aware of this with direct evidence (i.e. not your suspicions)

I will keep asking this question, if you refuse to answer, we will all know you're making it up

 

[dafydd]

dafydd said:


I have promised to do so, but only when I have had (been given) a chance to present enough information.

Nobody is stopping you. The floor is yours.

 

[Marduk]

dafydd said:


I have promised to do so, but only when I have had (been given) a chance to present enough information.

now, not later, if it's later you won't have any credibility left with which to say anything
youve had five pages to present enough information already
thats also 3 times you've now failed to answer a direct question

 

[dafydd]

now, not later, if it's later you won't have any credibility left with which to say anything
thats 3 times you've now refused to answer a direct question

I suggest that we all wait for the information to be presented. You can tell us who discovered it and where in one line. Take it away Kingfisher.

 

[Kingfisher2926]

Donn wrote:

Why is he calling it a seal? I get the potential movie-rights of 'The Genesis Seal', it sounds aventurous, but why a seal? Don't they close things off?
Is he saying it's a kind of lock with a security code? But the code must be known to open a lock. His 'seal' is supplyng stuff.

Think of a wax seal that is placed on the opening to an important document. While it is intact, the seal may present an image that identifies the author and his authority. However, the seal has to be broken to get at the contents within. In the case of the Genesis Seal, the plain text of Genesis is like a parchment with extra cryptic information within. Re-formatting the first eighteen words is equivalent to breaking the seal.

 

[Marduk]

Donn wrote:


Think of a wax seal that is placed on the opening to an important documant. While it is intact, the seal may present an image that identifies the author and his authority. However, the seal has to be broken to get at the contents within. In the case of the Genesis Seal, the plain text of Genesis is like a parchment with extra cryptic information within. Re-formatting the first eighteen words is equivalent to breaking the seal.

This is your fourth oppotunity to show youre not self deluded
I'd take it soon if I were you

so a question
Q. Show any character in history was aware of this with direct evidence (i.e. not your suspicions)

I will keep asking this question, if you refuse to answer, we will all know youre making it up

 

[dafydd]

Are you intent on ignoring all our questions? You can tell us who discovered it and where in one line. Take it away Kingfisher.

 

[Kingfisher2926]

You can find all sorts of way out crap on Google, but 'Genesis Seal' has one hit, this thread, It must be the best kept secret in history. It makes the Illuminati look like bungling amateurs.

Already answered this one.

 

[Marduk]

Already answered this one.

a lie is not an answer

so a question
Q. Show any character in history was aware of this with direct evidence (i.e. not your suspicions)

I will keep asking this question, if you refuse to answer, we will all know youre making it up

fifth chance

 

[dafydd]

Donn wrote:


Think of a wax seal that is placed on the opening to an important document. While it is intact, the seal may present an image that identifies the author and his authority. However, the seal has to be broken to get at the contents within. In the case of the Genesis Seal, the plain text of Genesis is like a parchment with extra cryptic information within. Re-formatting the first eighteen words is equivalent to breaking the seal.

We know what a seal is, see my earlier post. You are not reading our posts. Stop dodging. You can tell us who discovered it and where in one line. Do it, or our patience will run out and ignore buttons will be used.

 

[dafydd]

Already answered this one.

That is a lie. Give me an example of somebody using or discovering the seal in the past. Seventh chance.

 

[Kingfisher2926]

Marduk wrote:

so a question
Q. Show any character in history was aware of this with direct evidence (i.e. not your suspicions)

I will keep asking this question, if you refuse to answer, we will all know youre making it up

I'm not refusing, I just need time and space to work through the masses of background information that comes from the Genesis Seal. From my perspective, this is Catch 22. Again, I am not avoiding the question, and may have to ignore some future posts in order to supply data.

 

[dafydd]

Already answered this one.

That is a lie. You can tell us who discovered it and where in one line.

 

[Agatha]

Think of a wax seal that is placed on the opening to an important document. While it is intact, the seal may present an image that identifies the author and his authority. However, the seal has to be broken to get at the contents within. In the case of the Genesis Seal, the plain text of Genesis is like a parchment with extra cryptic information within. Re-formatting the first eighteen words is equivalent to breaking the seal.

And reformatting the first sentence of Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone will even give you the words "Lord Voldemort". Seriously, this is not anything paranormal or sent by any god, it's just brains finding patterns. All words are just patterns which are familiar to us.

Is there a reason why you aren't responding to people's questions? Do you have posts ready prepared or something?

 

[Marduk]

Marduk wrote:


I'm not refusing, I just need time and space to work through the masses of background information that comes from the Genesis Seal. From my perspective, this is Catch 22. Again, I am not avoiding the question, and may have to ignore some future posts in order to supply data.

this isn't a lecture, you are supposed to answer our questions, you are just being rude and arrogant.

just answer the question first, then present the rest of your evidence
that was your 8th oppotunity

 

[dafydd]

Marduk wrote:


I'm not refusing, I just need time and space to work through the masses of background information that comes from the Genesis Seal. From my perspective, this is Catch 22. Again, I am not avoiding the question, and may have to ignore some future posts in order to supply data.

You said that you did not work with information. I've had enough of your nonsense,. I see you're from Blackburn , which explains a lot. On ignore you go.

 

[Dinwar]

Dinwar,
I just crave a little patience. I will present the information as quickly as possible so that it can be discussed as a coherent whole.
Daffidd pointed out that what I am doing is not scholarship. Just bear in mind the the Klondike (sp?) goldrush was not started by a professional mining engineer, but by a guy out looking for his sister and her family.

The problem is, you've yet to show that your method is anything other than what's typically seen here. You're not the first to present such a find, and without something to distinguish yourself from the Bible Code other than you saying it's different your idea will gain no traction. You're not posting in a vacuum here--this group has a history, one that you may not be aware of but which you certainly can inspect.

And as for the gold rush, don't compare what you're doing to that. First off, it makes you look like a crackpot (I'm not saying you are one, but comparing yourself to historic figures is something crackpots usually do and something serious researchers do not do). Second, gold rushes are notoriously wasteful, in that while the first few get rich by being lucky most people lose everything they invest. Third, while one or two gold rushes were started by ametures, most mining operations are conducted by profesionals in a systematic fashion. I know--I've got good friends working for companies that mine gold.

As for having time, it's better to not dribble information out like this. Take the time to write a coherent summary of what you've done, so that in one post you can present everything. I know you're going to have to leave stuff out, but that's what the subsequent discussion is for. Dribbling information out like this puts you in a constant defensive position. You've got to remember that we don't know what information you have or do not have--all we've got is what you tell us. And on online forums it's assumed that what you present in an opening post like yours is a summary of the whole of your argument. Right, wrong, or indifferent, that's the assumption everyone makes.

My suggestion is, take some time off to put together one well-worded post outlining your ideas, and the evidence that your ideas are true. Then come back. We'll wait for a long time for you to do that--but this crew has little patience for people that expect us to not respond to half-formed arguments. We're argumentative.