The Freeman Movement and England

Status
Not open for further replies.
cocana said:
Welcome to the forum

Once upon a time when I was at school I wanted to be a professional footballer. It didn't happen. When I was a bit older I thought there would be a massive revolution. That didn't happen either.

Presumably you get to see and hear about Rob Menard quite a bit in your area? How nice for you.

When you further your research beyond freeman propaganda your views will probably change, but keep us posted and do let us know when you have contracted yourself out of all lawful authority.

GTM made a good point though. Surely wine, women and song are higher on your priority list? Make hay while the sun shines; your pitch fork soon goes rusty!
Click to expand...

Those look better than police, judges and jails that the freemen have to offer.
 
tsig said:
Those look better than police, judges and jails that the freemen have to offer.
Click to expand...

O heavens yes. Last thing I was thinking about at school was the intricacies of the legal system. Then again I think that was the last thing that freemen were thinking about judging by what we've seen. :D

I did enjoy chaing girls though!
 
Last edited:
gtm said:
The freemen have been rendered speechless (aside from the usual petty insults & windbaggery) by a microsopic British colony of child molesters:-

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=150329&page=14

A horrible decision for freemen for a whole load of reasons (from post 132 onwards). Enjoy :)
Click to expand...


Looks as if yozhik has finally managed to get his head around a basic principle of common law:
yozhik said:
Oh well ... **** ... if the judges and lords say it ... and case law records it ... it MUST be true. Who are we to question self referencing bollox?
Click to expand...
 
catsmate1 said:
Chasing? Chaining? We must know.................:D
Click to expand...


Perhaps not my finest post although in my defence I did compose it on the train home after a few after work 'refreshments' using my 'smart' phone.

For the record I meant 'chasing' :blush:

Perhaps HandyRandy has recently enrolled at 'Freeskewl University'? This might explain the otherwise highly improbable interest in FMOTL at the 'school' he attends.
 
Mojo said:
Looks as if yozhik has finally managed to get his head around a basic principle of common law:
Click to expand...

He's in so many knots at the moment that I'm unsure if he'll ever straighten himself out. Here's hoping that the new year brings him new beginnings though.
 
gtm said:
The freemen have been rendered speechless (aside from the usual petty insults & windbaggery) by a microsopic British colony of child molesters:-

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=150329&page=14

A horrible decision for freemen for a whole load of reasons (from post 132 onwards). Enjoy :)
Click to expand...

I did enjoy this, i particularly like the way rob the hat has to say all the time how "they" need his consent to do anything .................. that's it, in a nut shell, the whole freeman con sold by rob the hat. He appeals to the 14 year old truant hiding behind the bike sheds pretending they are rebels.Thing is when the headmaster comes to catch them what happens? I reckon someone like bones would tell him to ◊◊◊◊ off and get himself expelled, yozhik and rob the hat on the other hand would be sacred that their mum is gonna find out they smoke and meekly they trot off to the headmasters office to be punished. This scenario is the building blocks of their pathetic rebellion. Real revolutionaries they are not.
I've said it before but this time i'm finished with the freemen for good. I don't have any thing more to say about these people except maybe this, wake up you sheep, rob the hat is playing you and you mongs who buy his stuff are feeding not only his pocket but his ego and as such are his ladies
all together now
And the colored girls go
Doo, doo doo, doo doo, doo doo doo...
 
BobHaulk said:
I've said it before but this time i'm finished with the freemen for good. I don't have any thing more to say about these people except maybe this, wake up you sheep, rob the hat is playing you and you mongs who buy his stuff are feeding not only his pocket but his ego and as such are his ladies
Click to expand...


I could not agree with you more, which is why I have made it my new years resolution to step back from this stuff. It seems to me that freemen just enjoy being ignorant. Freeman mentality = stick your fingers in your ears and shout "la la la" to any voice of reason and then slag 'em off of course. Nothing will get through to them, ever. Failure is merely a case of the system being corrupt in their eyes. The absence of evidence to justify their beliefs is merely the system trampling on them to maintain control.

They have brainwashed themselves into believing that they are the bringers of a new dawn for humanity and, let's face it, if someone has a god complex, the voice of man is not going to make a difference.

They are total barnpots, but thankfully most people can see that anyway, so I'm with you - they've wasted enough of my time as well.

Hopefully I can stick to my resolution but the addiction to observing their sheer wallyness is strong! :D
 
Last edited:
Uh-oh. It seems as though the quote from the judge showing how its terrible, horrible statute law that allows one to remove consent from being a citizen (by leaving the country - not by simply declaring they do not consent and enjoying the benefits of citizenship) has got the kooks trying to quickly cover that up and ignore it.

They are also acting hysterical over the Pitcairn FOTLers. See this shining example of a logical fallacy from Menard:

Good thing too cause those who are not Freemen are far more likely to molest children, evidenced by the actions of the subjects of the Crown. You know, those who while being subjects of the crown, did molest children. Now however those who are subject to the Crown, try to claim that the people molesting the children were Freemen, and not subjects of the Crown. But did the Crown not act against them? Is that not evidence they were not Freemen, but were in fact subjects? And were they not subjects willing to molest children?
Click to expand...

So apparently, according to Menard, anytime the government acts against self-proclaimed Freemen that means they cannot be real freeman. So I guess Menard has just admitted that he and his entire troop of cult followers - each of whom the government has acted against in some way and for whom no government agency has ever acknowledged as a freeman - are not real freemen.

He just stepped in it...again. The hysterics to get out of this one should be lovely.
 
Its great how he stumbles from one disaster into another oblivious to his own stupidity.
He consistently contradicts himself and trips over his own words.

Hes also run away from a thread about ownership of a legal fiction created at birth.
he says in his video that when you register a child you hand over ownership of its "person" he cant however pinpoint when you actually acquired ownership of it in the first place in order for you to be able to give it away :D
Surely before registration the "person" doesn't exist, so you cant "own" it prior to registration.

Hopefully he will return with the answer.
 
Why wouldn't a Freeloader molest children? I thought the whole point was to not be bound by those pesky laws.
 
Good thing too cause those who are not Freemen are far more likely to molest children, evidenced by the actions of the subjects of the Crown. You know, those who while being subjects of the crown, did molest children. Now however those who are subject to the Crown, try to claim that the people molesting the children were Freemen, and not subjects of the Crown. But did the Crown not act against them? Is that not evidence they were not Freemen, but were in fact subjects? And were they not subjects willing to molest children?
Click to expand...

So you can tell that these people weren't Freemen, because if they were Freemen they'd have got away with molesting children?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom