The Freeman Movement and England

Status
Not open for further replies.
I would remove that if I were you gtm ,they tend to read this site and you may get a ban.

asky/JB


Done (I wouldn't want to miss out on the fun would I)

Girlgye on Bankrupcy & 'Allodial Title':-

Hmm. Alloidial Title is an issue in bankruptcy if you use debt notes yes. If you reclaim your land due to the fact that the contract was specious then it is not an issue at all is it?

You are removing Crown Rights.


Can anyone explain what in the whole wild world of sport she's on about?
 
Last edited:
The vast majority of people don't know one end of the law from another. And that includes solicitors, barristers, policemen, politicians and the general public. It's pathetic. England may be one of the most ignorant nations on this Earth.

The law of this land is and has always been superior to ALL Acts of Parliament. It is the supreme authority of this land and all governments, all rulers and the general public are subject to it. That's fact. The Acts of Parliament are NOT the law of this land. They are something different. They are acts of 'statute'. What's a Statute ? Why not find out and get a real education ?

Read a legal dictionary. A Statute is a regulative rule of a Society. That's what Acts of Parliament are. They (Statutes - Acts of Parliament) are binding on all members of the Society that is Parliament. But they are NOT binding on the men and women of this land without their consent. Think about it.

The men and women of this land all have the power of consent. Under the law. Because we do not live in a dictatorship. Do you you know this ? Their consent exists on ALL Acts of Parliament under the Rule of Law.

Thus, if you are member of a Society you are bound by their legislative rules. But not otherwise. If you are a member of a Tennis Society you are bound by the rules of that Tennis Society. If you are an oath swearing member of Parliament you are bound by the rules of Parliament. But nobody else - unless they have sworn an oath to be. I have not. Nor has the general public.

But all of this land are subject to the Law of this land.

How great is that ? Get it yet ? The Rule of Law. The Common Law.
 
Last edited:
Since the legal industry of this land is NOT the law of this land. It's an industry run by buffoons, sharks and oath swearing stooges. With few exceptions. Whose heads are full of textbook nonsense.

I understand.
You disagree with learning from textbooks.
Tell me, where did you obtain your education in law?
 
Last edited:
I have advised in dozens of cases. And I hope to advise in many more. Since the legal industry of this land is NOT the law of this land. It's an industry run by buffoons, sharks and oath swearing stooges. With few exceptions. Whose heads are full of textbook nonsense.

Have you taken 'silk' yet?
 
Stacey Grove,

There are books which are useful. But I can assure you the books being learned by law students are nonsense. In many, many ways. Not least because the legal system in operation in our courts is NOT the Common Law. And because, since 1066, the English legal system has been changed almost beyond recognition. Thirdly, because the Common Law is simply ignored by politicians (whose knowledge of the law is almost laughable). And fourthly, because politicians do not make laws. They make Acts of Parliament which are all (without exception) subject to the Law. To the Rule of Law. This basic fact is ignored widely in England. So that people hardly know what the law is. And the legal industry conspire to keep it that way. With their oath-swearing, profit-making, corporate Law Society.

I have learned what I know of the Law by reading the history of the law, the history of this land, by consulting others who know the law (and what it is not) and by witnessing in my own life the cost of being ignorant of the deceivers who work in its name.

The Common Law is that law which was brutally ignored by Parliament and its unelected head when they (the Parliament) signed up to union with a foreign power, contrary to the Common Law, contrary to democracy, and contrary to the Rights of the people of this land. Since which time our courts have become corporate, revenue collecting, private, profit-making businesses, falsely claiming to be hearing cases under the Law of this land, but, in fact, as corrupt and evil as governments, political parties and feudalism itself.

The legal industry is a bunch of corruption.


I understand.
You disagree with learning from textbooks.
Tell me, where did you obtain your education in law?
 
The law of this land is and has always been superior to ALL Acts of Parliament. It is the supreme authority of this land and all governments, all rulers and the general public are subject to it. That's fact. The Acts of Parliament are NOT the law of this land. They are something different. They are acts of 'statute'. What's a Statute ? Why not find out and get a real education ?

Read a legal dictionary. A Statute is a regulative rule of a Society. That's what Acts of Parliament are. They (Statutes - Acts of Parliament) are binding on all members of the Society that is Parliament. But they are NOT binding on the men and women of this land without their consent.

It's worth pointing out that this poster also believes that airliners fly backwards, although his inability to recognise that 500 is a smaller number than 1000 results in his not being able to understand that that's what he believes.

Dave
 
You must first subscribe to the belief that governments exist to serve the people, and not vice versa. You must subscribe to the belief that doing unto others as you would have done unto yourself (the foundations of the Common Law) is the supreme basis of the Common Law. And you must then judge for yourself, from the pages of history, from the experiences of others, and from the documentary record what system of law is corrupting our land. Since the antidote is right before us. The Common Law.

Those who serve others in this area are serving their fellow men and women at a time when the Common Law is being assaulted, impersonated and fraudulently dumped by ruling elites.

I will always be happy to assist in any specific area in which you may be interested. And, if I do not know, I will always, I promise, try to point you to sources who can assist. Freely. Since one is a legal industry and the other is the Law of this land.


Where may I read this "history of the law"?
 
Why not start with works by men such as Sir Edward Coke (1552-1634) whose writings on the common law were the definitive legal texts for nearly 150 years. Adding to this books on the papal/monarchy deal made after the Norman Invasion of 1066. Just for a start. And books on the Bill of Rights (1689). These are essential reading. Plus, of course, you must know what the Golden Rule is and how vital it is in the law of this land.

That's a start. After you have read this ask me for more. I will gladly oblige. Above all, you must know what laws are and what statutes are.

That's a start.

especially wrote


Could you recommend any I could aquire and read up on?

JB.asky
 
If you are prepared to read books I can recommend many. But I can also recommend that first of all you learn what the Golden Rule is. Do you know that ? And what laws are. And what Statutes are.

The list I have just suggested for Jargon Buster is a good start. Read them as a historical record. And consult men who know what they are talking about. Free from the legal industry.

And then ask me specific questions. Since I will not have you ignorant if you really wish to know what the Law of this land is, and what it is not. Above all, use the space between your ears. Use your common sense.

You haven't answered my question, Especially.

Pages of history?
Er, textbooks?
 
Last edited:
Statutes are all subject to the Law. As already indicated. And if they are not consistent with the law of this land they can and must be torn down and repealed. This is a simple lesson. Consider it your first.


As in statutory interpretation?
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom