More nonsense. No, you claimed only non-mainstream sources...
Link to the post where I claimed only "non-mainstream sources" were reporting the unanimous precincts.
My
actual words were, "Even more amazing: despite the
prevalance of these stories in the media over the past 48 hours, not one person from any of these precincts has come forward to say, 'Yeah, I voted for Romney and my vote didn't get counted.'" (emphasis added)
No, you conflated two separate topics. R.A.F. questioned whether the unanimous precincts were being reported in U.S. mainstream media. I had previously posted that they were, and corrected him on that point, before you corrected him.
Now you're trying to conflate that with my analysis of the alleged Pennsylvania voting machine sabotage, which you
did obtain from a tabloid -- the same tabloid all the others are citing as the primary source. You have yet to show that the "auditor" has been reported in the mainstream media, or in fact as a primary witness in any medium other than your rabidly anti-Obama tabloid.
I'm endeavoring to separate your various dissociated rants for the purposes of response. Kindly do the same.
And since 93 percent of African-Americans have been polled as voting for Obama [...] that leaves 7 percent who did not.
Asked and answered. Law of Averages and the Fallacy of Decomposition. Address my post on the subject before simply repeating your claims.
Most people, even educated people, have no clue about whether their vote was counted or not.
When the balloting is secret, that's an unavoidable outcome. The rare exception to that would be in the case of a unanimous precinct. We have on hand a number of unanimous precincts. Therefore any who voted in the category counted as zero would undoubtedly be able to determine that his vote had not counted.
But the published results --- 90,000 or so to zero -- betray the fraud...
Asked and answered. You have attempted to explain the outcome in a unanimous precinct by means of a testable hypothesis, but you refuse to test it and you refuse to accept the results of those others who have tested it and failed to confirm it. You attribute to "fraud" what you simply refuse to fathom from a political extremist standpoint. You even managed to leap over "legitimate error or malfunction" in your zeal to attribute to extreme malice what arises solely out of your unmet intuition.
You assert that there exist
actual human beings in those precincts who voted for Romney but whose votes did not count. Produce one or more of them. I don't accept handwaving nonsense about "virtual witnesses." I don't accept handwaving inferences from national voter profiles. Produce an
actual disenfranchised voter, or admit that all you have is handwaving speculation.
...and would even make a dictator blush.
Irrelevant hyperbole.
African-Americans are simply not that uniformly racist.
I'm talking about documented demographics, not racism. And you were quite adamant that we not "play the race card" when talking about other anti-Obama conspiracy theories (even those that were quite evidently racist). Hence you owe us an apology now for introducing that "forbidden" argument now that you think it's in your favor.
