The Doc vs Pdoherty - Debate Underway

[jaydeehess]

He also is acusing the FDNY of the very least being an accomplice to insurance fraud!

Well now that does not make sense. Insurance would be paid out whether or not it was demolished by the terrorists' actions or by the NYFD.

In fact, if you check your homeowner's policy you will notice that there is a clause that states that you are not covered for damage caused by war or terrorism. The WTC was covered for acts of terrorism, P.D. asserts that the building was so unstable that it was brought down rather than have it fall on its own which certainly implies that even before it came down that it was a write off due to the terrorists' actions next door. So there was no reason to hide the demolition for insurance purposes.

 

[DGM]

Well now that does not make sense. Insurance would be paid out whether or not it was demolished by the terrorists' actions or by the NYFD.

In fact, if you check your homeowner's policy you will notice that there is a clause that states that you are not covered for damage caused by war or terrorism. The WTC was covered for acts of terrorism, P.D. asserts that the building was so unstable that it was brought down rather than have it fall on its own which certainly implies that even before it came down that it was a write off due to the terrorists' actions next door. So there was no reason to hide the demolition for insurance purposes.

I stand corrected. Thank you

 

[jaydeehess]

Newfoundlanders would be dismayed to hear that others think they use "eh?" in their sentences. In general, by west, i meant west of my location in Atlantic Canada, so that means our nation's Capital qualifies...lol

The community in NL that you refer to, is called "Vibrator".

no...j/k...there is a town in NL called "Dildo".

TAM

BINGO, and he does say 'eh'.

BTW, I am east of Winnipeg but west of (way west of) Toronto

 

[Stellafane]

P'Doh's theory that WTC7 was brought down to aid rescue efforts may be the most insane thing I've ever heard a CT'er utter, and that's really saying something. It ranks right up there (or down there, depending on your viewpoint) with the idea that terrorists were driving around that day in a van with a picture of a plane crashing into WTC painted on the side. (WTF??)

 

[Horatius]

... but now begs other questions such as how it could have been proposed that explosives be loaded into a 47 storey office building that is structurally unsound and on fire and still have some assurance that it would fall where you wanted it to.

Not too mention, where, in the middle of such a complete disaster, did they find enough explosives to do the job, all in just a few hours? Are there large stockpiles of high explosive just lying around NYC, which they just hand out to whoever needs it?

 

[pomeroo]

Huh? What's his point? If indeed the fire department had decided to demolish the building as a safety measure, or to aid the rescue effort, what would be the point of denying it?

Or will he get to that?

Rolfe.

Yes, what would be the point of denying it? Where exactly does the Impossibly Vast Conspiracy fit into p-dope's humanitarian hypothesis?

 

[jaydeehess]

P.D. says "who knows" why they covered it up, that perhaps authority to do so had not been garnered.

His style of "debate" more resembles an arguement than actual debate.

 

[~enigma~]

P.D. says "who knows" why they covered it up, that perhaps authority to do so had not been garnered.

His style of "debate" more resembles an arguement than actual debate.

Style? Doc is debating himself. Pdopey is just commenting on whatever Doc says. I think Doc should make up a plausably sounding bit of evidence and see if that psycho from the UK bites.

 

[defaultdotxbe]

P.D. says "who knows" why they covered it up, that perhaps authority to do so had not been garnered.

His style of "debate" more resembles an arguement than actual debate.

according to pdoh, the doc is getting owned

http://screwloosechange.xbehome.com/index.php?s=&showtopic=1841&view=findpost&p=22347

the irony in his "see what you want to see" is almost too perfect to be unintentional

when truthers talk about debate results it always makes me think of this

 

[The Doc]

I have responded to pdoherty's second post.

 

[Travis]

They're talking about this over at Loose Change.

 

[DGM]

They're talking about this over at Loose Change.

They don't (can't) debate. only argue. Debate takes facts and evidence.

 

[Belz...]

Its already summer.

Yes. Why wait to the 21st when you can declare spring is over, yourself, three weeks early ?

 

[DGM]

Yes. Why wait to the 21st when you can declare spring is over, yourself, three weeks early ?

He can't even get that right!

 

[The Doc]

I noticed p'doh has replied to my last post. Is anyone else finding these one-liner responses dull?

 

[MG1962]

Newfoundlanders would be dismayed to hear that others think they use "eh?" in their sentences. In general, by west, i meant west of my location in Atlantic Canada, so that means our nation's Capital qualifies...lol

The community in NL that you refer to, is called "Vibrator".

no...j/k...there is a town in NL called "Dildo".

TAM

Whatever

http://www.tep.com.au/region/iron_knob.htm

 

[twinstead]

I noticed p'doh has replied to my last post. Is anyone else finding these one-liner responses dull?

He still didn't explain how the presence of 'evaporated' steel, which he claims was found and requires "huge temperatures not attainable in an office fire, even one fed by diesel fuel" is evidence of controlled demolition.

 

[negativ]

No way. Dohboy could NEVER grow such a singularly awesome mustache.

 

[D'rok]

Whatever

http://www.tep.com.au/region/iron_knob.htm

Try saying this one out loud with an Aussie accent:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lake_Minnewanka

It might even be an apt description of Mr. P'doh.

 

[The Doc]

Myself and Pdoherty have posted:

1x Opening Statement
3x Replies

We are down to closing statements ladies and gentlemen.