The "Carlos Swett affair"

Status
Not open for further replies.
I must confess that I overlooked that thread for the longest time, after it got to ten or eleven pages, I decided to peek in. I thought it was fascinating that this guy seemed to be so into his delusion, so I asked a question or two.

I'm sorry and I pledge not to post any more to it.
 
YOUR MEA CULPA.( "ANOTHER LOSER")

CurtC said:
I must confess that I overlooked that thread for the longest time, after it got to ten or eleven pages, I decided to peek in. I thought it was fascinating that this guy seemed to be so into his delusion, so I asked a question or two.

I'm sorry and I pledge not to post any more to it.
I

Also posted by CURTC
"just meant to post a pledge, in this thread, not to post to that thread any more. But I inadvertently posted it into that thread. Mea culpa."

Hi Curt C:

There were more than two questions you asked me, ALL of them answered. I also made some questions to you, but you never answered.

If you have any more doubts , question to James Randi, and force him to put my application and the poor answer(and full of lies) they gave me as JREF speakers.But don't forget to tell him to put his sign on it.

Continue visiting the thread (but in silence) and if you have problems with your mind visit a professional.

Thanks,
S&S
 
HONOR OR HONOUR

Doubt said:



Of course, it there was a second camera at a different location that saw this object, then my explanation would be invalid. Do you have a second perspective on the object?


Hi Doubt:

Yes , si, of course, we, yap, afirmativo.

I have the second one.
Was taped from the perspective of the street , (not from a building as the other one).

Is curious that tape is also censored.
Was not showed at the anniversary of the tragedy (kike the other one ), but was broadcasted by CNN at the six months of the tragedy(edited in the moment of the cross of the "thing").

But at the first week of the tragedy was transmitted ,considering
people was focused in the plane crashes.I have it. Is my surprise to Randi when he decides to write about it.

Yes they are more , another one from a long view of CNN 5 seconds (and 300 feets )before the plane crashes the second tower. In that "long"trayectory of the plane are many white points in "triangle formations" that appears and dissapears. That same shot was analize by ufo followers but only refering to a big white "object " that appears when the second plane finally crashed the second tower. I don't aggree with that theory, but the 3 or 4 triangle formations are very rare.
I have also one singular shot unedited by tv france with some "rare" views ,but controversial.

Doubt, I have a hobby to tape different things from my satelite reception.
I like specially subjects in reference to art, history, nature, inventions and stuff that help my kids and my family improve in education.
That tragic day , I also taped the sequences trannsmitted live from different networks of the world. I was worried of the consequences (and still I am) of that stupid action and the future of mankind. I am a peaceful man , have a lovely family, all based in LOVE and respect. I don't care if James Randi is a GOD for you all, he lost, lied and still is on silence. I am not afraid, I JUST WANTED TO SHARE A TRUTH. It would be more easy and remunerative to me if I went to see the charlatans, ufo beleivers,
ufo web pages, etc, but I did not. I am rational as you think you are, I went and send and ask Randi for an answer, He gave me a stupid answer based in a stupid method. He failed with me. That's all the key of the mistery.
That's the main reason I am fighting here, I did to myself ALL and more questions that you did to me at this thread, I did not received a single penny, I did not create a page web, I told JREF and Randi the million dollars per se , was not my main reason to challenge him. I did with professional equipments the analisis of the tape, not with my tape, with the own 3/4 tapes of the tv channels. They were scared at that time, and censored in my country by "higher" commands. But there are tape that register those interviews to me and the analisis with the necesary equipments. I also digitized the tape and with proffesional softwares of friends that works with graphic design made the analisis. I s not a bird , is a HAT FORM similar to the ones posted by latinIJRAL and produced by edenex.

Maybe some "honest" member of this forum and specially one that is not a "Randi's beleiver" can do the same thing, only for curiosity, but here I will not allow that members say "I don't need to see the video, is a bird , idiot" .That is the way trolls react. Or :"you failed at the rules" another loser reaction.
This is between JAMES RANDI and me.Is my honor.
Or kike a friend of England told me " Now is James Randi honor (or honour)".

Thanks,
S&S
 
THE T-SHIRT

bidlack said:
OK, Carlos, let me try and speak to you in your own way that I might therefore avoid "stupid" questions again. Please address my final concerns below. If you can explain these, I will be convinced.


-given the veracity of your claim, can you swear or affirmm, or attest that that ingestion of biochemical Galenicals from a sybaritism concern have not mitigated the intersection of the claim and the non-claim, vis-a-vis the outcome of the resolution in current dollars?



Hi BId lack :

I swear that if you continue posting stupids things (only the number of posts counts) YOU will be soon become a "rational thinker", and Randi will make a you a discount in a T-shirt with his picture on it.

YES, keep on going, you are proud of being the idiot.
Soon, someone like you will reward you. Or the computer.

Thanks,
S&S
 
CWL said:
I simply cannot resist.

I can't help myself wondering what the regulars of this thread think of this.

Devil my ass. That's the spittin' image of my third wife Ethel.

And she was the 'cute' one.
 
JUST ANOTHER ANALYSIS

!!
 

Attachments

  • fotonormal2chica 0.jpg
    fotonormal2chica 0.jpg
    6.6 KB · Views: 159
  • fotonormal2chica 0.jpg
    fotonormal2chica 0.jpg
    6.6 KB · Views: 159

Attachments

  • wtcaisladobw 3.jpg
    wtcaisladobw 3.jpg
    17.2 KB · Views: 154
  • wtcaisladobw 3.jpg
    wtcaisladobw 3.jpg
    17.2 KB · Views: 154

Attachments

  • wtcaisladogausiano 4.jpg
    wtcaisladogausiano 4.jpg
    7.5 KB · Views: 152
  • wtcaisladogausiano 4.jpg
    wtcaisladogausiano 4.jpg
    7.5 KB · Views: 152

Attachments

  • wtcdetalles 5.jpg
    wtcdetalles 5.jpg
    19.5 KB · Views: 147
  • wtcdetalles 5.jpg
    wtcdetalles 5.jpg
    19.5 KB · Views: 147
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: JUST ANOTHER ANALYSIS

latinijral said:

?
 

Attachments

  • titularwtc2 6.jpg
    titularwtc2 6.jpg
    23.6 KB · Views: 145
  • titularwtc2 6.jpg
    titularwtc2 6.jpg
    23.6 KB · Views: 145
Latin, when will you realize that repeating an argument doesn't make it any more valid? Posting the pictures again will have no effect on anyone's opinions, other than to make you look like a fool. I advise that in the future, you don't bother reposting material already posted to this thread.
 
IT IS JUST ANOTHER ANALYSIS

rwald said:
Latin, when will you realize that repeating an argument doesn't make it any more valid? Posting the pictures again will have no effect on anyone's opinions, other than to make you look like a fool. I advise that in the future, you don't bother reposting material already posted to this thread.

I am not repeating arguments. I am only repeating the pictures to this new page, so everybody can see them again.
Fool???? you looks like a fool with your threads.

Example 1:
Rwald: 10-16-2002
I'd love to stop replying to him, but it's just y really hard! I'm sorry for what I've done. But I can't stop now.
 
Why post the pictures again, if people could just scroll up to see them? And you've often in the past reposted comments made by others, without responding to them at all. This is why you look like a fool.
 
AFRAID OF THE PICTURES?

rwald said:
Latin, when will you realize that repeating an argument doesn't make it any more valid? Posting the pictures again will have no effect on anyone's opinions, other than to make you look like a fool. I advise that in the future, you don't bother reposting material already posted to this thread.

Rwald:

At least some effect effect had on you those pictures, you replied it faster.Are you afraid to see the pictures?

How many times you repeated and reproduce your claiming about that my application is not valid?Were more than 50?

Don't forget to read always my signature, are also your words.

Thanks,
S&S
 
At least I'm repeating my own words. Latin just repeats the words of others (or in this case, the pictures of others). And as I've told you before, just because I figured out why you were originally confused doesn't mean I don't think you were confused. And the fact that you have yet to see the truth, no matter how many times we tell it to you, clearly shows that anything positive I said about you was wrong.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom