• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Merged The Cain exposé / 4th woman jumps on the Cain train

To those of you who think that it is all about race and that it is an attack on a black man who dares to stick his head up over the wall, remember that we now have a black, Democratic president and that we threw a white, liberal front-runner for the presidency under the bus when his sexual misconduct became known.

[Snipped the usual insults.]

The accusation is that liberals are quick to condemn black conservatives. I don't buy it, but let's be accurate.
 
Perry is a dimbulb, but the, so was Bush the Lesser. Staffers had to do a lot of the real crerative work.

One of Perry's staffers was highly-placed within the restruant association when the harrassment issue was being handled.

Not a great leap of logic here.

I really wish this staffer would come out of the closet. I would be surprised if anyone can out-rove the Rovester.
 
The accusation is that liberals are quick to condemn black conservatives. I don't buy it, but let's be accurate.

Two things come to mind here.

First, liberals are hardly reluctant to attack white conservatives when they set themselves up for it the way Cain is doing.

Second, perhaps conservatives, who are demonstrably quick to condemn black liberals for any real or imagined reason, are simply projecting?
 
Perry isn't clever enough to cover all the bases of deniability. I see the Cain attack as a Karl Rove operation.

Ah, The Great Satan Theory.

There's no motive.
The Bushies dislike Perry, ... intensely.
The Bushies are maneuvering for "Jeb in 2016". Cain is so beatable that they'd be giggling with glee if he got nominated.
Cain's demise will not boost Romney so much as Perry.
Even if Perry loses, it won't satisfy the Bushies. They want him embarassed, rather than a noble warrior who came in second (a la McCain, a la Romney) and who's in a position to vie for the nomination in '16. Cain staying in there and even losing to Romney would make Rick a distant third - an afterthought.

Thus, I see no logic behind Karl having done this. (Unless he just needs to keep his hand in because he's The Great Satan and it's his nature.)
 
The accusation is that liberals are quick to condemn black conservatives. I don't buy it, but let's be accurate.
Exactly my point. It aint about race. It is about sexual thuggery.

We just threw one really fine Democratic conressman under the bus for less abusive things than what the pizza pusher appears to have done.
 
The Jews need a Republican nominee that is loyal to Israel. They need a candidate with a proven track record of loyalty and support. They would prefer someone from Congress. Romney and Cain would not be considered reliable. Ron Paul would be considered hostile since he would end foreign aid. Perry has visited Israel ten times and was their favorite for awhile until his debate performances and drunken sideshow.

That leaves Bachmann, Gingrich, and Santorum. All are fanatical supporters of Israel. Of these I think Gingrich and Santorum are acceptable to the Israelis.

Gingrich is moving up in the polls.
 
When did that become creepy? I thought that in other cases it is said to add to his roguish charm.
The jackass is also supposed to be the darling of the religious right. Great freaking role model for the kiddies, isn't he?
 
If Perry is behind it, that answers my "why now" question.

If Democrats had this, the time for it would be right after the GOP convention when Cain was the nominee. I know somebody who is sitting on something (not nearly so bad - I doubt much impact) on Perry to be played out in chapter, verse and four part harmony as soon as he is nominated.
 
Exactly my point. It aint about race. It is about sexual thuggery.

We just threw one really fine Democratic conressman under the bus for less abusive things than what the pizza pusher appears to have done.

Oh come on. We dont even know what he has allegedly done.
 
The Jews need a Republican nominee that is loyal to Israel. They need a candidate with a proven track record of loyalty and support. They would prefer someone from Congress. Romney and Cain would not be considered reliable. Ron Paul would be considered hostile since he would end foreign aid. Perry has visited Israel ten times and was their favorite for awhile until his debate performances and drunken sideshow.

That leaves Bachmann, Gingrich, and Santorum. All are fanatical supporters of Israel. Of these I think Gingrich and Santorum are acceptable to the Israelis.

Gingrich is moving up in the polls.

Bingo! We have a winner!

:rolleyes:
 
Oh come on. We dont even know what he has allegedly done.
We do know that, whatever he did, they nutter lied about it and told a different fib each time he did so. This is part of a behavioral pattern called "confabulation" and it is a sign of utter unfitness for any office of great trust and responsibility.

Dude is sleazy and unstable.
 
Not sure why we care "who leaked the information." It's not like it wouldn't have come out when/if he was vetted as the candidate.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom